Cowboy
Wait for it.
DS, I am confused as to why you would choose to comment on something that hasn't even been mentioned in this thread as far as evidence much less proof.Lia,
Sites such as the one above can make skeptics out of believers! You MUST accept that "The Face on Mars" is artificial in order
to buy into anything else, as absolutely ALL of the following "data" (triangles, etc.) are based on the presumption
that, since "The Face" is artificial, so must these be. And that is faulty reasoning, as there is a great deal of doubt as to
whether or not "The Face" is anything more than a natural anomaly. Nature gives us startling things constantly!
For example, go to Google Maps, satellite view, and enter the following coordinates: 50° 0'38.20"N 110° 6'48.32"W
(you may need to move the map to the right a smidgeon)
Note the astounding detail: a chin, lips, a nose (with nostrils!), eyes, eyebrows ... even a fancy headdress! How could
all this have happened without intelligent beings doing it? Surely this must be Significant!! Does this not prove
that ancient natives carved this as a sign to space-farers, or that aliens left it as a sign they had been here? It MUST, as
they even put an IPod earphone in his/her ear!! Doesn't this prove that aliens were here? Doesn't this demolish all
the skeptics? Do pigs fly??
Please understand that I am firmly on the side of those who know that Project Blue Book was actually a cover-up
operation, and that, for whatever reason, this little planet has been frequently visited by folks from somewhere else.
But quoting sites such as 'metaresearch' is going to tarnish your own reputation, as it is clearly non-objective and
based on circular logic*. There are a lot of legitimate, thoughtful sites out there ... try to research a bit more
to be sure you're not encouraging people to go to a site that will damage our case.
*Essentially, a formal logical fallacy which assumes its own central point is already proven, and then uses this assumption to
support itself. A classic example:
"Only a thief would become an auto mechanic. The fact that there are dishonest mechanics proves this."

There are many sites that are questionable as far as doctered so called proof and ussually the comments made by some are what makes a site questionable IMHO . But I am glad they are out there to make people aware of things that may very well exsist , its just up to each individual to decide for theirselves AFTER taking the time to do some of your own research . Thats why I cant stand skeptics because they have it set in their minds such things dont or cant exsist but have absolutly have no proof or evidence that they dont.

That said , I use several different sites to do my research on things that interest me, and when I find something specific I do more research . When I think I have enough then I post it merely as an interesting topic , not saying anything is fact. Much like your opinion of "do pigs fly" , do you have any proof or evidence they dont?

My main point is that there are things known to Nasa and the government that they have gone to far out of their way to keep from the public for reasons unknown . Some of the experts in different software programs that can see through blurred images and give interesting opinions after doing their research, and I for one like to at least look at them and come to my own desicion while keeping an open mind .

Just because some so called experts are so quick to debunk something doesn't mean they are anymore credible then anyone else , they just have their own agenda and reasoning for doing so IMHO.
There are literally hundreds of what appear to be face like images, not only on Mars but the moon as well . I use the sites that do their studys mainly to get the coordinates so I can view for myself through google earth or other satelite imagery sites that are available on the net.

Also you mentioned the other face structure in Canada that you pointed out " they even put an IPOD in his/hers ear" either you were just being sarcastic which I would like to think , OR you are not really aware of the layout on the land around that area.

At any rate here is another interesting anomoly found on mars . I will post it because I find it anything but a natural formation but that dont make it a fact. Once again people have to decide for theirselves .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?src_vi...gY&annotation_id=annotation_472124&feature=iv
http://www.msss.com/msss_images/2008/02/14/
Link for attached photo. All original photo credits belongs to NASA . http://marsanomalies.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=anomalies&action=display&thread=163