Democrats to spend $20Million to figure out why Men don't like them anymore

[Melensdad]

Have they lost their flipping minds? How do they not understand?


Maybe they should try less soy?

Perhaps stop embracing effeminate role models like David Hogg with his skinny arms and lack of actual accomplishment? Perhaps they might want to actually protect women instead of claiming to become them, going into their dressing and locker rooms, and then destroying them during competitions? How about losing their double standards about female abuse like Doug Emhoff slapping a woman in public because he was jealous but then 'supporting' his wife Kamala Harris. Blaming 'toxic masculinity' for all things bad in society but then wondering why they can't recruit people into the armed forces. Of course trotting out crybabies like Tampon Tim Walz to show us how to change the air filter on vintage pick up or failing correctly load his own shotgun while pheasant hunting?

Seriously they are stomping their size 12 tassel loafers on the beauty pageant runways while competing for Miss Maine, but don't know why men won't take them seriously.

Seems like there are so many OBVIOUS reasons why Democrats have lost actual male role models and support.

Dems Mull $20 Million Plan To Figure Out Why Young Men Don't Like Them | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

​

​

Dems Mull $20 Million Plan To Figure Out Why Young Men Don't Like Them​

Six months after a stinging nationwide rejection that handed Donald Trump a commanding reelection and fractured their core coalition, the Democratic Party is turning to a new solution: spending $20 million to figure out why young men don’t like them.​

​

​

​

The project, codenamed SAM — short for “Speaking with American Men: A Strategic Plan” - is described in a prospectus obtained by the New York Times. It outlines a massive push to decode the language and culture of disaffected young men, particularly in online spaces, and includes a proposal to buy ads inside video games.​

​

“Above all, we must shift from a moralizing tone,” the document urges.​

​

The effort comes amid widespread Democratic soul-searching after a loss that wasn’t just electoral, but cultural. A recent NBC News poll placed the party’s favorability at just 27 percent, its worst showing in the poll’s 34-year history.​

​

Focus groups show the branding problem is dire. One Georgia man recently summed it up succinctly: "A deer in headlights." According to messaging consultant Anat Shenker-Osorio, Democrats are consistently described in her focus groups as "sloths," "tortoises," and now, apparently, roadkill.​

​

"You stand there and you see the car coming," the man explained. "But you’re going to stand there and get hit with it anyway."​

​

Democratic leaders are scrambling to reassemble a coalition that used to be rock-solid: young voters, working-class Americans, Latinos, and Black voters all shifted toward Trump in 2024 - and this time, he won the popular vote, too.​

​

"There is fear, there is anxiety, and there are very real questions about the path forward - all of which I share," said Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO), who is charged with recruiting candidates to help win back the House in 2026. “We are losing support in vast swaths of the country.”​

​

Even the long-standing gender gap, which typically favored Democrats, flipped in key districts as men swung harder to the right. It’s one of the driving reasons behind the $20 million SAM initiative.​

​

Meanwhile, the party is facing open rebellion from within. Progressive activists are outraged at what they see as a lack of fight. Moderate Democrats are openly warning that cultural messaging - on issues like immigration, gender, and economic elitism - is alienating the very voters the party once claimed as its base.​

​

"We’ve pushed, in so many ways, these people away from our party," Crow said.​

​

Former DNC Chair Jaime Harrison, who stepped down in February, admitted "The party has to find ways to compete in states where it’s not."​

​

But instead of barnstorming in battleground counties, Democratic donors are reportedly huddling in luxury hotels, commissioning focus groups and digital rebrand efforts that - to some - look more like anthropology than campaigning.​

​

Democratic pollster Zac McCrary said Trump’s declining approval ratings may create openings in 2026, but warned against reading too much into a potential midterm bounce.​

​

"A good 2026 midterm - we should not let that mask a deeper problem," McCrary said, adding that the party’s brand is 'repellent' in so much of the country.'​

​

He blamed a credibility gap: "Democrats have lost credibility by being seen as alien on cultural issues."​

​

For many in the party’s activist and base circles, the appetite for bold messaging and confrontation remains strong.​

​

"Voters are hungry for people to actually stand up for them - or get caught trying," said Shenker-Osorio. "The party is doing a lot of navel-gazing and not enough full-belly acting."​

​

Whether Democrats will rediscover their spine, or waste millions more studying why they don’t have one, remains to be seen.​

 

[FrancSevin]

Typical Democratic strategy to spend money to find out the obvious.
At least they are spending their own money on this folly.
Give me one of those $million I would gladly tell them.
At least they are not using Taxpayer dollars.
Or are they?

 

[waybomb]

It's our money, thanks to some NGO

 

[Melensdad]

It's our money, thanks to some NGO

Undoubtably correct

The NGO's are funded by all these grants that were given by gubmint agencies from the EPA to USAID. But there is no doubt in my mind that this $20 Million oblivious study of the obvious is funded by you, me and others who pay taxes.

 

[XeVfTEUtaAqJHTqq]

They should spend more. Maybe $200 million. That will work.

 

[Melensdad]

They should spend more. Maybe $200 million. That will work.

Democrats view of Toxic Masculinity . . . they can count on him to stop the red wave???

 

[Slant Eyed Polack]

In terms of media presence/perception, I'd argue it may have all started with this precious little boy.

 

[Melensdad]

In terms of media presence/perception, I'd argue it may have all started with this precious little boy.

View attachment 191748

This advertisement is probably the origins of the downfall of the Democrats failures with men.

I can recall we mocked it here on the FF with pajama boy was rolled out in their PR campaign.

One thing you have to admit, President Obama was masterful at dividing people into groups of victims and pitting those victims against oppressors. It seems like the ONLY group that was not a victim and was always an oppressor, was a strong Christian male . . . clinging to his Bible and his gun. It was strongly implied 'he' was also white, but not always stated that 'he' was white. Everyone else could be a victim. And now we have all these effeminate men, the spindly David Hoggs and the exuberant Tim Walz's of the world, dancing around and celebrating trans-men in beauty pageants and sports and pushing their socialist/communist ideology.

 

[Melensdad]

Oh this is just rich.

David Hogg, the do nothing kid who rode false fame all he way to the hall of Harvard, was recently elected Vice-Chair of the Democratic Party. After becoming Vice-Chair he announced that he would raise $20 MILLION to "primary" some of the "safe" Democratic members of the House of Representatives who are not LIBERAL ENOUGH to pass his DEI purity tests.

So how does the Democratic Party respond? They now say that his election to Vice-Chair of their Party excluded more diverse candidates and he was elected in error. They are looking to have a 'do-over' election to oust him from their ranks.

THIS IS JUST ANOTHER REASON why actual men feel alienated from the Democratic party. Elect a man (and that term is used loosely with David Hogg), then out him! Men feel as though they are being attacked by "the system" and this is just such an attack, although in this particular case I think it is funny and ironic.

DNC's David Hogg expresses concerns about optics as party considers redoing his election next month

If they do move forward with the redo, members would vote for a new male vice chair from June 12-14 followed by a vote for a second vice chair of any gender from June 15-17.

justthenews.com

DNC's David Hogg expresses concerns about optics as party considers redoing his election next month​

If they do move forward with the redo, members would vote for a new male vice chair from June 12-14 followed by a vote for a second vice chair of any gender from June 15-17.​

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Vice Chair David Hogg on Thursday urged his fellow party members not to move forward with considering a redo of his election, warning that doing so "sends a horrible message" to liberal voters.​

. . . ​

Now the party is considering a redo of Hogg's election and that of another vice-chair because of a procedural complaint over the way the election was done.​

​

Both candidates will still be allowed to seek their posts again, but Hogg has been in the center of controversy after he launched a $20 million effort last month that supports more than a dozen primary challenges against Democratic members of Congress he accused of being asleep at the wheel.​

​

DNC members are now expected to vote electronically on whether to move forward with the redo election from June 9 -11, per Politico. ​

​

If they do move forward with the redo, members would vote for a new male vice chair from June 12-14 followed by a vote for a second vice chair of any gender from June 15-17.​

​

Hogg strongly encouraged the party to reject a redo of the election, because it would send a "horrible message" about whether the party was capable of holding an election as they prepare for the 2026 Midterms.​

​

“If we’re to redo this election, it truly just sends a horrible message that we really do not want out there at this moment,” Hogg said. “That’s why I believe that it should not go forward.” ​

​

​

 

[Melensdad]

 

[waybomb]

How much does anybody want to bet the swamp will do nothing but hold hearings about any of this? They can't even seem to do spending, much less hold anybody accountable. Democrats, Republicans, same shit same day over and over and over.
What the hell can we do about it? Don't say vote. We did. It didn't work.

 

[Melensdad]

 

[Melensdad]

From the good folks at AMAC ... if you are not aware of the Association of Mature American Citizens, the benefits they offer to folks over 50, then you need to get to know them. AMAC is a true alternative to other organizations that offer benefits to older and retired people, they are pro-freedom, pro-gun, conservatives.

CLUELESS: Democrats Spend $20 Million to Figure Out How to Talk to Men | @AmacforAmerica

Democrats' war on masculinity is pushing male voters away. Their $20M plan won’t work unless they address the real reasons men are leaving.

amac.us

CLUELESS: Democrats Spend $20 Million to Figure Out How to Talk to Men​

Shane Harris​

​

In the latest sign that Democrats still have no idea why they lost the 2024 election, the party is planning to spend $20 million on an initiative called “Speaking with American Men: A Strategic Plan.” Spoiler: it’s every bit as ridiculous and cringeworthy as it sounds.​

​

The New York Times was the first to report on the proposal, known as “SAM” for short. As they explain, SAM “promises investment to ‘study the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality in [male] spaces.’ It recommends buying advertisements in video games, among other things.”​

​

It’s easy to see why Democrats are panicking about their standing with men. Last November, Kamala Harris lost six points overall among male voters compared to Joe Biden’s performance in 2020. That shift was more pronounced among racial minorities – Trump performed seven points better with Black men and an astonishing 12 points better with Latino men.​

​

Young men – and young minority men especially – moved toward Trump at an even greater clip, a worrying sign given that Democrats typically rely on winning a large majority of young voters. According to the Associated Press, Trump gained about 20 points with young Black and Latino men, and he won about 60 percent of White male voters under 30.​

​

Meanwhile, Harris either remained stagnant or lost ground with women compared to Biden’s performance in 2020. She lost seven points with Latina women, four points with Asian American women, and one point with women overall. She remained stagnant with White women and Black women.​

​

Translation? Trump’s victory last year was largely driven by men – and if Democrats don’t win back those voters soon, they’re going to have a hard time winning any elections moving forward.​

​

Liberals deserve some credit for recognizing that they have a “men problem.” But they have thus far utterly failed to realize why increasing numbers of men – and young men in particular – aren’t buying what Democrats are selling. It has nothing to do with “syntax” and everything to do with the fact that the American Left has for decades now waged an all-out war on masculinity.​

​

Liberals have recast traditional male virtues – strength, protectiveness, resilience, leadership – as sins against their new religion of progressive orthodoxy. Boys are told that wanting to lead or compete is “toxic,” that showing confidence or physical courage is a form of “patriarchal aggression,” and that desiring to provide for or protect their families is somehow oppressive to women. Even fatherhood has been devalued, with leftist pundits and activists insisting that “father figures” are interchangeable or unnecessary.​

​

In the world of modern liberalism, masculinity isn’t something to be guided or elevated – it’s something to be dismantled. We see this in schools that punish boys for being too energetic, in universities that teach young men to apologize for their very existence, and in workplaces where showing ambition or assertiveness is treated as a moral failing if you’re male.​

​

The Left has gone so far down this feminized rabbit hole that even simple male pastimes are now suspect.​

​

Take, for instance, the liberal media’s bizarre narrative that working out is right-wing, extremist, and even racist. Back in 2022, Time Magazine published an article on the supposed “White Supremacist Origins of Exercise.” That same year, MSNBC worriedabout “the far-right’s obsession with fitness.”​

​

By far the gem of this genre was a 2024 Zoe Williams opinion piece for The Guardian which declared, “Getting fit is great – but it could turn you into a rightwing jerk.” As Williams matter-of-factly informs us, “The more self-actualized you become, the higher you are on self-righteousness, blaming other people’s problems on their failure to be as healthy as you.”​

​

The American Left has also gone after the simple act of enjoying a steak as a supposed act of right-wing extremism. The Atlantic declared earlier this year that “the rise of meat-eating is part of the larger wave of right-wing influence on American culture,” while The Nation informed us back in 2020 that red meat had become “the red pill for the alt right.”​

​

But undoubtedly the most jaw-dropping headline came from Newsweek last September: “How Hot Girls Became the Right’s New Obsession.”​

​

In sum, if we are to believe liberal media headlines from the past two years, lifting weights, eating meat, and being attracted to beautiful women are all now “right-wing” acts if you’re a man. It’s clear that the Left waged this crusade to scold and demoralize men into abandoning those activities, but it’s had the opposite effect. Men have been told for so long that the things they naturally want to do are right-wing that they’ve internalized it, and now that is being reflected at the ballot box.​

​

It doesn’t help matters that Democrats have effectively exiled all the masculine energy from their party. The fact that Tim Walz and Pete Buttigieg are billed as “masculine” Democrats says it all about the party’s complete failure to understand what men look for in role models.​

​

The American Left doesn’t have a messaging problem with men—it has a contempt problem. Until Democrats stop ridiculing the values, interests, and instincts that define healthy masculinity, they’ll keep losing the very voters they’re now spending millions to understand.​

​

is the Editor in Chief of AMAC Newsline. You can follow him on X @shaneharris513.​

​

 

[Melensdad]

 

[tiredretired]

Dems:

“Working out is right wing”

“Liking hot girls is right wing”

“Eating red meat is right wing”

"Masculinity is right wing"

Dems today:

“We need $20 million to understand why young men hate our guts”

 

[Melensdad]

Dems:

“Working out is right wing”

“Liking hot girls is right wing”

“Eating red meat is right wing”

"Masculinity is right wing"

Dems today:

“We need $20 million to understand why young men hate our guts”

You forgot:

MATH is right wing and racist.

Speaking ENGLISH is right wing and racist.

Self Defense is right wing and racist.

Voting ON Election DAY is right wing and racist.

Voter ID is right wing and racist.

Working for a living is right wing and racist.

Raising a traditional family with a mother and a father is right wing and racist.

and the list goes on and on . . .

 

[Melensdad]

 

[Melensdad]

Here is another reason why rational men have little in common with Democrats. The latest male members of the generation has actually embraced patriotism while the girls often have become more liberal, the older generations of men generally still embrace patriotic values. And then there is this…

 

[Don Coyote]

City Folk have lost their minds.......... us Rural Americans are still alright.

......... Must be the fluoride in the water?

 

[m1west]

City Folk have lost their minds.......... us Rural Americans are still alright.

......... Must be the fluoride in the water?

Or all the Meds in the water that doesn’t come out of the water at the water treatment plant

 

[Melensdad]

Or all the Meds in the water that doesn’t come out of the water at the water treatment plant

And the 'micro-plastics' in the city tap water too.

 

[Melensdad]

Seriously, this is apparently with $20 Million buys you in the elite circles of the Democratic party.

Seems like a winning strategy

RIGHT???

Democrats have engaged Olivia Julianna as part of their strategy to bring young men back to the party

Democrats have engaged Olivia Julianna as part of their strategy to bring young men back to the party

www.pacificpundit.com

Democrats have engaged Olivia Julianna as part of their strategy to bring young men back to the party​

May 29, 2025 Leave a comment
Like us on Facebook (don't let them censor another conservative site!):

Ok, forgive me for not knowing how Olivia Julianna is, but after reading about her and seeing this Democrat “influencers” photos, I just had to have a laugh… Democrats really think this person is going to bring young men back to the Democrat party.. Yes, Olivia Julianna.

 

[FrancSevin]

The Democrats "F" up again. They are flipping nutcakes!!!
With this move, 2026 elections are safe and in the bag for the GOP

 

[Don Coyote]

Ok, forgive me for not knowing how Olivia Julianna is, but after reading about her and seeing this Democrat “influencers” photos, I just had to have a laugh…

Do Democrats honestly believe that People like this are a MAJORITY division of American Voters?

......... Seriously,...... if you run a candidate that only appeals to three percent of the population, ... what makes you think you're going to gather any more than three percent of the vote?

For every single voter that is influenced by Olivia Julianna, I'll bet there are a dozen others that run the other way.

.......... Fine with me.

 

[FrancSevin]

Do Democrats honestly believe that People like this are a MAJORITY division of American Voters?

......... Seriously,...... if you run a candidate that only appeals to three percent of the population, ... what makes you think you're going to gather any more than three percent of the vote?

For every single voter that is influenced by Olivia Julianna, I'll bet there are a dozen others that run the other way.

.......... Fine with me.

An interesting observation Don Coyote
The party claiming to be soooooooooooooooo worried about Democracy repeatedly publishes proof of their deaf ear to the majority opinions of the people. It will take more than $20,000,000 to change the minds of the people to their nonsense.
However, if it is the people's money, and I believe this is, they will spend it.

 

[Melensdad]