• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Business OWNERS GO ON STRIKE! No hiring while Obama attacks businesses!

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
NOT speaking for any particular Tea Party, an activist Tea Party blogger has asked businesses to go on a hiring strike against the Democratic-Socialist attacks against business (both small and large). Not sure it will gain much traction with most people but honestly this is exactly how I've felt for the past several years.

http://www.portfolio.com/business-n...tivist-urges-small-businesses-to-go-on-strike

Business Owner: I'm on Strike
by Kent Hoover Oct 19 2011
Tea Party activist urges firms to "not hire a single person" until the "war on business" she says is being waged on America by president Obama and the "Democrats-Socialists" is stopped.

A Tea Party activist has called on small businesses to stop hiring until the “war against business” by President Barack Obama and “Democrats-Socialists” is stopped.

Melissa Brookstone, on a blog posted yesterday on Tea Party Nation’s web site, called for this action, echoing the immortal words of Ellis Wyatt in Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged” —“I’m on strike!” In this libertarian manifesto, America’s most productive citizens, including business leaders, disappear to protest government control of industry.

To Brookstone, the U.S. has reached that point under Obama.

“Resolved that,” her post begins, “The Obama administration and the Democrat-controlled Senate, in alliance with a global Progressive socialist movement, have participated in what appears to be a globalist socialist agenda of redistribution of wealth, and the waging of class warfare against our constitutional republic’s heritage of individual rights, free market capitalism, and indeed our Constitution itself, with the ultimate goal of collapsing the U.S. economy and globalizing us into socialism.”

The post goes on to accuse Obama of seizing “dictatorial powers” and committing treason. The president and his Democratic allies are “killing businesses in this country with an environment hostile to business.” They’ve colluded with the news media to encourage “Occupy Wall Street” demonstrations (and similar protests in other cities) that “are being populated by various Marxists, socialists and even communists, and are protesting against business, private property ownership and capitalism, something I thought I’d never see in my country, in my lifetime.”

“I, an American small business owner, part of the class that produces the vast majority of real, wealth producing jobs in this country, hereby resolve that I will not hire a single person until this war against business and my country is stopped.

“I hereby declare that my job creation potential is now ceased.

“I’m on strike!”

Responses to the post ranged from full agreement to apparent sarcasm, such as “Business should stop providing services and goods to ‘liberal looking’ people. One commenter said it makes no sense for businesses to hurt themselves or people who need jobs and suggested a better approach would be to start a nationwide boycott of the federal government. Restaurants should stop delivering to federal offices, for example.

Think this is wacky? Well, look at what Senate Majority Harry Reid, said on the Senate floor this morning. He’s chopping Obama’s proposed jobs bill into pieces, and the first part he’ll bring to the floor is legislation to provide aid to states and localities so they can keep or rehire police officers, firefighters and teachers. Reid said public-sector jobs should be more of a priority for Congress than private-sector jobs, according to The Hill newspaper.

"It's very clear that private-sector jobs have been doing just fine; it's the public-sector jobs where we've lost huge numbers, and that's what this legislation is all about," Reid said.

Sounds like a socialist, right?

Meanwhile, the Tea Party Nation blogger’s call for small businesses to go on strike may be moot: That’s already happening, according to House Speaker John Boehner.

“Job creators are basically on strike,” Boehner said back in September, because of a “triple threat” of excessive regulation, a tax code that discourages investment and the federal government’s “spending binge.”




Read more: http://www.portfolio.com/business-n...mall-businesses-to-go-on-strike#ixzz1bQ6yU600
 
It does seem like this has been going on for the past few years without small businesses calling it a strike. So they might as well make their voices heard and join together saying why they are not hiring. Obama is trashing them and wants them to pay a bigger share of the tax burden. Why not fight back?
 
I think most small businesses would hire if they thought they could benefit from it. Based on the current state of the economy (and my personal experience) demand is at an all time low. There is no urgency to undertake new projects and it seems most businesses are just treading water hoping to keep their head afloat.
 
This is nonsense and not really a good idea. It may seem gratifying but it is not grounded in principles the right can defend.

It is the left which insists on civil unrest sometime violent. it is theleft that condones it and it istheleft whivchrelies onsuch unrest to justifymore police, more laws, more regulationsand more control, "for our own good.

Folks who want to be safe from such unrest easily giveup their freedoma bit, tohave peace.

I would hope that is not in the DNA of a conservative. to heare theis froma TEA is discouraging because it should most definetely not arise from that element.


I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it "
TJefferson

"Those who would give up liberty for peace deserve neither Liberty or peace."
BFranklin


PBinWA is spot on correct.

I am a small business owner, I'm not hiring because there is no perception of a secure business environment in the coming years. So our resources are not going to be put at risk. We have three new products to release but will not until this storm passes.
THE ONLY THING WE KNOW FOR CERTAIN IS THAT IF OBAMACARE IS IMPLEMETED, WE WILL SHUT DOWN. PERIOD.

franc
 
This is nonsense and not really a good idea. It may seem gratifying but it is not grounded in principles the right can defend.

. . .

franc

Perhaps the GOP can't defend this type of action but the LIBERTARIANS can easily defend this as a common sense approach to starving the government of tax revenues. :hammer:
 
Yes a good idea of starving the government of tax revenues. So perhaps we should simply go back to every man for himself with no roads, military, or any other kind of infrastructure neede to make this a modern country. You know kind of like Afghanistan is today.

Really intelligent guys so you don't get all you want, being everything then you have a temper tantrum. Sound like a bunch of preschool children.
 
Last edited:
Yes a good idea of starving the government of tax revenues. So perhaps we should simply go back to every man for himself with no roads, military, or any other kind of infrastructure neede to make this a modern country. You know kind of like Afghanistan is today.

Really intelligent guys so you don't get all you want, being everything then you have a temper tantrum. Sound like a bunch of preschool children.

Actually it sounds like a bunch of spoiled leftist diorganized kids having a WE ARE PISSED party on Wall Street. And contains nothing veridical with TEA party principles.

I am in agreemetwith Joec here. Credibility of this idea sucks fellas.
 
Actually it sounds like a bunch of spoiled leftist diorganized kids having a WE ARE PISSED party on Wall Street. And contains nothing veridical with TEA party principles.

I am in agreemetwith Joec here. Credibility of this idea sucks fellas.

Actually it sounds like both the left and the right to me, today. And both parties want to run our private lives regardless.

I do agree that the credibility of this idea sucks but if you own a business knock yourselves out but please don't hold it against me if I don't follow the pack.
 
Actually it sounds like both the left and the right to me, today. And both parties want to run our private lives regardless.

I do agree that the credibility of this idea sucks but if you own a business knock yourselves out but please don't hold it against me if I don't follow the pack.

Truth is I do own a business. I am down to some 20 - 25 employees. We won't hire more until work comes in the door. If itdoes, I'll bring back the 25 we laid off last June.

All we are doing is treading water trying not to go under, piss off our clients and hope the government doesn't demand one more document, one more certification, one more proceedure, one more"right," one more insurance requirement, or one more dime.

We simply don't have it.

franc
 
We are only 2 people here but business is down for us due to the high unemployment which is also the cause probably or your problems also.

People have no job, no money so they simply can't spend. Until the jobs come back and people start earning we are all in trouble but the current congress talks about everything but jobs. It is a basic fact of business, if you have a product to sell and no buyers you are soon out of work.

Hell the republican controlled house spent all of one day last week on abortion but not a single minute on jobs of any kind except their own. I guess it would be nice to have congresses schedule as they are in recess more than at work.
 
Sounds to me like it will just give the left ammo,( not that it matters)they are already trying to come up with some one else to blame, its not just Bush's fault its the dam buisneses:yum::yum:...(buisness will hire if it is profitable and their is demand.)If the left could just nudge the businesses into a position where they would have to hire to get some kind of tax incentive to stay competitive:whistling: it then could be taken away later after they have invested valuable time and resources in new labor....:rolleyes: ,
 
I own two companies. OK, actually, I only own 50% of one of them.

I'm so on the sidelines that I'm in a "hiding" mode. I've gone into a personal self-preservation mode.

As it applies to this subject/thread, YEP, I'M NOT HIRING. I'll do the work myself whether it be good for me or anyone else.

Really depressing since we are in the USA.
 
I own two companies. OK, actually, I only own 50% of one of them.

I'm so on the sidelines that I'm in a "hiding" mode. I've gone into a personal self-preservation mode.

As it applies to this subject/thread, YEP, I'M NOT HIRING. I'll do the work myself whether it be good for me or anyone else.

Really depressing since we are in the USA.

I know the feeling myself as we have tried to hire a relief manager here up till about a year ago. At that time we gave up because work was still good in Kentucky and now that it is above the national average we can't hire extra help. My wife and I work the extra 2 days a week.
 
I know the feeling myself as we have tried to hire a relief manager here up till about a year ago. At that time we gave up because work was still good in Kentucky and now that it is above the national average we can't hire extra help. My wife and I work the extra 2 days a week.

Where do you find two extra days? I thought we were only given seven?:brows:

Our Girl Friday left, discouraged, about six months ago. We did not replace her. My wife has taken over the data entry and invoicing . She works till 9:00 most nights.

Normaly we would have replaced the person but the expense of that salary isn't in the receivables right now.

The former employee was from a well heeled family so she is not hurting. The lady now enjoys a relatively soft lifestyle supplemented by 99 weeks of unemployment.


franc
 
Sounds to me like it will just give the left ammo,( not that it matters)they are already trying to come up with some one else to blame, its not just Bush's fault its the dam buisneses. . .

I doubt anyone has actually done the reading of the Obama jobs bill.

But Obama is blaming the GOP for holding up the "jobs bill" and preventing it from passing. Obama is also blaming business for not 'unleashing their wallets' and hiring people.

Obama says that there is a TAX INCENTIVE for hiring the unemployed. That tax incentive is worth a couple thousand dollars.

But what Obama has not admitted is that the so-called "jobs bill" also contains the ability for unemployed to SUE EMPLOYERS for up to $300,000 if the employer hires someone, and favors someone who already was employed.

Let's see, if I hire someone I potentially get a tax credit worth about $2500.

But if I hire the wrong person then I can get sued for $300,000.00.

I choose to remain on strike and not hire anyone!
 
yup, that's called creating an environment for job groath.....

no, it's called an attempt to redistribute wealth, aka "spread it around"
 
Top