• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Biden's FBI director James Comey to be indicted for Lying To Congress ...

BOOM

Comey goes in and asks the court to dismiss the charges.

Prosecutor counters by providing a HANDWRITTEN NOTE from COMEY that admits he knew all about the plan by "HRC" (Hillary Rodham Clinton) to create the Russia Collusion Hoax to frame Trump.



Screenshot 2025-11-04 at 8.53.33 AM.png



And here is Exhibit 5 that was dropped:





And then Exhibit 7 is dropped on Comey:





and Exhibit 10:

 
Great article from John Solomon's JUST THE NEWS FOUNDATION . . . lots of deep investigative reporting at that sight so well worth checking out.


Comey Boomerang: Ex-director confronted with personal emails, notes after playing victim card

New director Patel brings the receipt as the DOJ pushes back on claims that it selectively or vindictively charged James Comey.

James Comey played the victim card in fighting his indictment on charges of misleading Congress, but that strategy boomeranged when prosecutors and his old agency released an avalanche of new evidence showing the ex-FBI director hoped to please Hillary Clinton, cheered on media leaks he claimed he did not sanction, and wrote emails and notes that directly conflict with his past congressional testimony.
Part of that unflattering portrait of Comey, prosecutors revealed Monday, came from long-hidden files that the new FBI Director Kash Patel found in burn bags and secret storage rooms at the bureau's headquarters.
The evidence included proof that Comey used a private email account to conduct FBI matters -- including media strategy with a top lieutenant -- at the same time his agency probed Clinton for improperly using her own private email for government business.
"Perhaps you can make him smarter,” Comey wrote in one such email to FBI special government employee Daniel Richman in which the two discussed trying to influence a New York Times reporter about his coverage of the Clinton email scandal.
Prosecutors made clear such evidence will be used to try to show at trial that Comey misled Congress when he denied authorizing staff to anonymously leak or talk to reporters.
"Consistent with the above-described correspondence, Richman corresponded extensively with members of the media regarding or on behalf of the defendant, including in an anonymous capacity," the Justice Department filing argued.
The cache of documents also includes September 2016 handwritten notes in which Comey appears to address U.S. intelligence intercepts about Clinton planning to manufacture a Russia scandal against Trump, something he told senators he didn't recall knowing.
Comey did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent to him through his lawyers.

Comey's politicization executed to get in Hillary's good graces

Federal prosecutors said in court filings that they have unearthed a trove of personal emails showing that Comey openly talked in the days before the 2016 election that he expected to be working soon for President-elect Hillary Clinton and that he was being kept apprised by his friend Richman on apparent efforts to anonymously provide information to the news media.
The DOJ also showed on Monday that, despite Comey telling Congress he didn’t recall it, he had taken handwritten notes in September 2016 indicating he had been briefed on the so-called Clinton Plan Intelligence indicating Clinton’s 2016 campaign planned to tie Trump to Russia.
Comey’s lawyers in late October filed briefs to persuade a judge to dismiss the charges against their client, who has pleaded not guilty, by claiming that he was being "selectively and vindictively" prosecuted.
“The government has singled out Mr. Comey for prosecution because of his protected speech and because of President Trump’s personal animus toward Mr. Comey,” Comey’s lawyers told the judge in court filings last month. “Such a vindictive and selective prosecution violates the First Amendment, Due Process Clause, and equal protection principles. The proper remedy for this unconstitutional prosecution is dismissal with prejudice. Any lesser remedy would be insufficient in light of the government’s flagrant misconduct and the need to deter the government from bringing further unconstitutional prosecutions.”

DOJ: "A duly constituted grand jury found probable cause that he committed the indicted offenses"

The Justice Department fired back in a Monday court filing signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Tyler Lemons and Gabriel Diaz.
“The prosecution is not vindictive. The defendant has not produced ‘direct evidence’ of a vindictive motive. And he has not shown that the prosecutor pursued this case ‘solely to punish’ him for exercising his First Amendment rights. So he has not carried his heavy burden of establishing vindictive prosecution,” the DOJ lawyers said Monday. “The prosecution is also not selective. The defendant has not identified similarly situated individuals who were not prosecuted. And he has not provided evidence that the decision to prosecute him was made because of his protected activities. He has not produced the ‘clear evidence’ required for dismissing an indictment based on selective prosecution.”
The DOJ court filing added: “A duly appointed and unbiased prosecutor presented the indictment. And a duly constituted grand jury found probable cause that he committed the indicted offenses. The motion to dismiss and request for discovery should be denied, and the case should proceed to trial.”

Comey used a personal and anonymous email account to associate/leaker

Comey, fired as FBI director in 2017 by President Donald Trump, oversaw both the politicized investigation into Hillary Clinton's illicit use of a private email server to send classified information and the baseless Trump-Russia collusion inquiry.
Despite investigating Clinton for her improper use of a private email server, Comey himself was using a personal and anonymous Gmail account to discuss FBI matters with Richman.
Comey made a public speech exonerating Clinton of criminality in July 2016, but alerted Congress in October 2016 that further Clinton emails had been found after the FBI searched a laptop belonging to disgraced former Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner, then the husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.
"Some day they will figure it out. And as [Individual 1 and Individual 2] point out, my decision will be one a president-elect Clinton will be very grateful for (although that wasn’t why I did it)," Comey wrote Richman in one newly-released email in late October 2016.
Richman previously admitted to agents in interviews that he routinely communicated on behalf of Comey, his longtime friend, with New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt, whose work was among the newspaper's 2018 Pulitzer-winning stories on Russian election interference. The goal, Richman told the FBI, was "to correct stories critical of Comey, the FBI and to shape future press coverage" outside the bureau's official press office, according to internal FBI memos.
"Richman was pretty sure he did not confirm the Classified Information. However, Richman told the interviewing agents he was sure 'with a discount' that he did not tell Schmidt about the Classified Information," one FBI memo recounted.

Emails indicate clear intention, collaboration between Comey and leaker Richman

“Make sure you keep your eyes shut. The country can’t seem to handle your finding stuff,” Richman wrote to Comey on Oct. 29, 2016. Comey replied: “Thanks for the battling you have done against unreason. This is a strange time. Bt we press on.”

The next day, Richman sent Comey an email about an opinion piece he had been asked to write for The New York Times about Comey’s letter to Congress. Richman stated that he was “not inclined” to “write something” but that he would “do it” if Comey thought it would “help things to explain that [Comey] owed [C]ong[ress] absolute candor” and that Comey’s “credibility w[ith] [C]ong[ress] w[ould] be particularly important in the coming years of threatened [c]ong[ressional] investigations.”
“No need. At this point it would [be] shouting into the wind. Some day they will figure it out. And as [Individual 1 and Individual 2] point out, my decision will be one a president-elect Clinton will be very grateful for (although that wasn’t why I did it),” Comey said in his Oct. 30, 2016 response back.
The DOJ said Monday that Comey “appears to have reconsidered that view shortly thereafter” and pointed to Comey’s lengthy email to Richman the next day.
“When I read the times [New York Times] coverage involving [Reporter 1], I am left with the sense that they don’t understand the significance of my having spoke about the case in July [2016]. It changes the entire analysis. Perhaps you can make him smarter,” Comey told Richman on Nov. 1, 2016.
Richman responded the next day, saying: “This is precisely the case I made to them and thought they understood. I was quite wrong. Indeed I went further and said mindless allegiance to the policy (and recognition that more evidence could come in) would have counseled silence in july to let hrc [Hillary Clinton] twist in the wind.”
Richman soon added, “Just got the point home to [Reporter 1]. Probably was rougher than u would have been.”
Comey then emailed Richman shortly thereafter, saying “pretty good” and sending a link to a New York Times piece about Comey’s alleged options in late October 2016 concerning the Clinton email investigation. Comey told Richman, “Someone showed some logic. I would paint the cons more darkly but not bad.” Richman then responded: “See I *can* teach.”
The DOJ’s indictment against Comey, approved by a federal grand jury in September, stems from allegations that Comey misled the Senate during his testimony in late September 2020, when he reiterated his May 2017 denial that he had ever authorized a leak of information to the media about the Trump-Russia investigation or Clinton-related investigations. The indictment also alleged that Comey had obstructed Congress by lying to the Senate.
“After the defendant sent the October 2016 letter the defendant emailed extensively with Daniel Richman,” the DOJ said in its Monday court filing. “Much of the correspondence occurred via the defendant’s use of a personal email account and Mr. Richman’s use of an email account associated with Columbia University.”
The DOJ on Monday also said that, in the spring of this year, “a team of FBI investigators was assembled to examine possible reform of policies, procedures, compliance, and culture at the FBI” and that “FBI investigators were alerted to a seemingly unused SCIF in FBI headquarters (Room 9582) containing a random collection of classified documents.”

DOJ: "Comey's prosecution" implicates societal interests of the highest order”

“A large majority of the documents were on the floor in five burn bags. Room 9582 was then subject to an inventory for the documents that were located inside. Investigators located hundreds of pages relating to Crossfire Hurricane … and the then-classified appendix to the 2016 Durham Special Counsel Report (now partially declassified),” the DOJ said. “Additionally, inside a locked safe within Room 9582, investigators located copies of handwritten notes of the defendant when he was the Director of the FBI.”
The DOJ said that Comey’s handwritten notes “were not known to any prior investigative teams.”
The DOJ lawyers insisted in their Monday court filing that “there is a history of prosecuting high-level Executive Branch officials who have lied to Congress about their official actions” and that “it is hardly surprising that the Executive would prioritize the prosecution of high-level agency officials who have lied to Congressional investigators about their official actions.”
“The societal interests in this prosecution are readily apparent and overwhelming,” the DOJ added of its charges against Comey. “The defendant is a former FBI Director who lied to Congress about his conduct while at the helm of the Nation’s primary federal law-enforcement agency. His prosecution implicates societal interests of the highest order.”
 
And now more indictments. Better than that, a grand jury was set up in FLORIDA, which is far less tolerant of political crimes than is the Washington DC, Maryland, North Virginia district.

The Dominos are starting to get lined up for their downfall.

These people need to go to jail. That is how you stop this. If there are no consequences then the crimes will continue.


This is pretty much a blockbuster exclusive and Fox reporter Brooke Singman probably will win an award for this reporting.


Brennan, Strzok, Page subpoenaed as part of federal Russiagate probe: Sources

Law enforcement sources told Fox News Digital that up to 30 subpoenas related to the probe will be issued in the coming days

November 7, 2025 5:52pm EST

Fox News correspondent David Spunt reports on the latest in the 'Russiagate' investigation on 'Special Report.'
EXCLUSIVE: A federal grand jury has subpoenaed former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, among others as part of the Justice Department’s investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, Fox News Digital has learned.
Sources told Fox News Digital Brennan; Strzok, the FBI’s former deputy assistant director of counterintelligence; and Page, a former FBI lawyer, were served with federal subpoenas on Friday.
John Brennan on Meet the Press
John Brennan, Former CIA Director; NBC News Senior National Security and Intelligence Analyst, appears on "Meet the Press" in Washington, D.C., Sunday, April 15, 2018. (William B. Plowman/NBC/NBC Newswire/NBCUniversal via Getty Images)
Law enforcement sources told Fox News Digital that up to 30 subpoenas will be issued in the coming days relating to the investigation.
The grand jury is out of the Southern District of Florida. U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida Jason Reding Quiñones is supervising the probe.
Fox News Digital first reported this summer that Brennan was under criminal investigation.
Strzok and Page first came under scrutiny in 2018 when Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz uncovered a series of anti-Trump text messages between them. Both were assigned to work on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team in 2017.
Page served on Mueller’s team on a short detail, returning to the FBI’s Office of General Counsel in July 2017. Strzok, though, was removed from the team and was reassigned to the FBI’s Human Resources Division. Prior to serving in the special counsel’s office, Strzok was a top agent in the bureau’s counterintelligence division.
Strzok is the FBI agent who, in July 2016, opened the FBI’s initial Russia investigation, which was nicknamed "Crossfire Hurricane" inside the bureau.
Former FBI officials Peter Strzok, left, and Lisa Page, right, both served on Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team.
Former FBI officials Peter Strzok, left, and Lisa Page, right, both served on Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team. (Chip Somodevilla / Staff ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / Contributor)
Page resigned from the bureau in May 2018, and Strzok eventually was fired in August 2018.
Strzok was fired from the bureau in August 2018 after months of scrutiny regarding the anti-Trump text messages exchanged between himself and Page.
During congressional testimony in 2018, Strzok confirmed that he and Page were involved in an extramarital affair.
As for the criminal investigation into Brennan, CIA Director John Ratcliffe referred evidence of wrongdoing by Brennan to FBI Director Kash Patel for potential prosecution, DOJ sources told Fox News Digital.
Sources, at the time, said that the referral was received and told Fox News Digital that a criminal investigation into Brennan was opened and is underway. DOJ sources declined to provide further details. It is unclear, at this point, if the investigation spans beyond his alleged false statements to Congress.
Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi (L) and Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Kash Patel look on as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference in the Oval Office of the White House on Oct. 15, 2025, in Washington, DC. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
The Brennan investigation came after Ratcliffe, this summer, declassified a "lessons learned" review of the creation of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA). The 2017 ICA alleged Russia sought to influence the 2016 presidential election to help then-candidate Donald Trump. But the review found that the process of the ICA's creation was rushed with "procedural anomalies," and that officials diverted from intelligence standards.
It also determined that the "decision by agency heads to include the Steele Dossier in the ICA ran counter to fundamental tradecraft principles and ultimately undermined the credibility of a key judgment."
The dossier — an anti-Trump document filled with unverified and wholly inaccurate claims that was commissioned by Fusion GPS and paid for by Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC — has been widely discredited. Last week's review marks the first time career CIA officials have acknowledged politicization of the process by which the ICA was written, particularly by Obama-era political appointees.
Records declassified as part of that review further revealed that Brennan did, in fact, push for the dossier to be included in the 2017 ICA.
Brennan testified to the House Judiciary Committee in May 2023, however, that he did not believe the dossier should be included in that intelligence product.
Ratcliffe was not surprised by the review's findings, a source familiar told Fox News Digital, given the director's long history of criticizing Brennan's politicization of intelligence. But Ratcliffe was compelled to refer aspects of Brennan’s involvement to the FBI for review of possible criminality, the source said.
The source was unable to share the sensitive details of Ratcliffe’s criminal referral to the FBI with Fox News Digital, but said that Brennan "violated the public’s trust and should be held accountable for it."
CIA Director John Ratcliffe testifies
CIA Director John Ratcliffe, flanked by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, left, and Defense Intelligence Agency Director Jeffrey Kruse, testifies as the House Intelligence Committee holds a hearing on worldwide threats, at the Capitol, in Washington, on Wednesday, March 26. (AP/J. Scott Applewhite)
The false statements portion of the probe stems from a newly declassified email sent to Brennan by the former deputy CIA director in December 2016. That message said that including the dossier in the ICA in any capacity jeopardized "the credibility of the entire paper."
"Despite these objections, Brennan showed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness," the new CIA review states. "When confronted with specific flaws in the Dossier by the two mission center leaders – one with extensive operational experience and the other with a strong analytic background – he appeared more swayed by the Dossier's general conformity with existing theories than by legitimate tradecraft concerns."
Barack Obama with John Brennan
Former President Barack Obama and former CIA director John Brennan in the East Room at the White House on Jan. 7, 2013, in Washington, D.C. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
The review added: "Brennan ultimately formalized his position in writing, stating that ‘my bottomline is that I believe that the information warrants inclusion in the report.’"
But Brennan testified the opposite in front of Congress in May 2023.
"The CIA was very much opposed to having any reference or inclusion of the Steele dossier in the Intelligence Community Assessment," Brennan testified before the House committee, according to the transcript of his deposition reviewed by Fox News Digital. "And so they sent over a copy of the dossier to say that this was going to be separate from the rest of that assessment."
CIA officials at the time of its creation pushed back against the FBI, which sought to include the dossier, arguing that the dossier should not be included in the assessment, and casting it as simply "internet rumor."
Ultimately, Steele’s reporting was not included in the body of the final ICA prepared for then-President Barack Obama, but instead detailed in this footnote, "largely at the insistence of FBI’s senior leadership," according to a review by the Justice Department inspector general, and later, the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Christopher Steele
Christopher Steele, the former MI6 agent who set up Orbis Business Intelligence and compiled a dossier on Donald Trump. ((Photo by Victoria Jones/PA Images via Getty Images))
But back in June 2020, Ratcliffe, while serving as director of national intelligence, declassified a footnote of the 2017 ICA, which revealed that the reporting of Trump dossier author Christopher Steele had only "limited corroboration" regarding whether then-President-elect Trump "knowingly worked with Russian officials to bolster his chances of beating" Hillary Clinton and other claims.
The footnote, also known as "Annex A" of the 2017 ICA, exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital in June 2020, spanned less than two pages and detailed reporting by Steele, the former British spy who authored the unverified anti-Trump dossier — a document that helped serve as the basis for controversial Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants obtained against former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.
Steele’s reporting, at the time, was commissioned by opposition research firm Fusion GPS and funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) through law firm Perkins Coie.
The footnote made clear the internal concerns officials had over that document.
"An FBI source (Steele) using both identified and unidentified subsources, volunteered highly politically sensitive information from the summer to the fall of 2016 on Russian influence efforts aimed at the US presidential election," the annex read. "We have only limited corroboration of the source’s reporting in this case and did not use it to reach the analytic conclusions of the CIA/FBI/NSA assessment."
"The source collected this information on behalf of private clients and was not compensated for it by the FBI," it continued.
But the annex notes that Steele's reporting was "not developed by the layered subsource network."
"The FBI source caveated that, although similar to previously provided reporting in terms of content, the source was unable to vouch for the additional information's sourcing and accuracy," the annex states. "Hence this information is not included in this product."
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz also reviewed the inclusion of Steele’s reporting in the ICA during his review of alleged misconduct related to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA.
His report, released in late 2019, found that there were "significant inaccuracies and omissions" in FISA warrants for former Trump campaign aide Page. Those warrants relied heavily on Steele’s reporting, despite the FBI not having had specific information corroborating allegations against Page that were included in Steele’s reporting.
Meanwhile, Fox News Digital exclusively reported in October 2020 that Brennan briefed former President Obama and administration officials on intelligence that then-Democrat nominee former Secretary of State Clinton was stirring up a plan to tie Trump to Russia.
Robert Mueller at the Department of Justice
Former FBI Director Robert Mueller, pictured May 29, 2019, is the latest person to testify in the House Oversight Committee's probe into Jeffrey Epstein. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence, declassified Brennan’s handwritten notes memorializing that meeting, which were exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital in October 2020.
On July 28, 2016, Brennan briefed Obama on a plan from one of Clinton's campaign foreign policy advisors "to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service."
Comey, then-Vice President Joe Biden, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper were in the Brennan-Obama briefing.
After that briefing, the CIA properly forwarded that information through a Counterintelligence Operational Lead (CIOL) to Comey and then-Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok, with the subject line: "Crossfire Hurricane."
Fox News Digital exclusively obtained and reported on the CIOL in October 2020, which stated: "The following information is provided for the exclusive use of your bureau for background investigative action or lead purposes as appropriate."
"Per FBI verbal request, CIA provides the below examples of information the CROSSFIRE HURRICANE fusion cell has gleaned to date," the memo continued. "An exchange (REDACTED) discussing US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s approval of a plan concerning US presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering US elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server."
James Comey speaks during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Capitol Hill.
Former FBI Director James Comey testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee about his interactions with President Donald Trump and the Russia investigation on June 8, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Cheriss May/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
The FBI on July 31, 2016, opened a counterintelligence investigation into whether candidate Trump and members of his campaign were colluding or coordinating with Russia to influence the 2016 campaign. That investigation was referred to inside the bureau as "Crossfire Hurricane."
Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller was appointed to take over the FBI’s original "Crossfire Hurricane" investigation. After nearly two years, Mueller’s investigation, which concluded in March 2019, yielded no evidence of criminal conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russian officials during the 2016 presidential election.
Shortly after, John Durham was appointed as special counsel to investigate the origins of the "Crossfire Hurricane" probe.
Durham found that the FBI "failed to act" on a "clear warning sign" that the bureau was the "target" of a Clinton-led effort to "manipulate or influence the law enforcement process for political purposes" ahead of the 2016 presidential election.
Durham-Trump-Clinton split
Jeff Durham, Donald Trump, and Hillary Clinton (Associated Press)
"The aforementioned facts reflect a rather startling and inexplicable failure to adequately consider and incorporate the Clinton Plan intelligence into the FBI’s investigative decision-making in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation," Durham’s report states.
"Indeed, had the FBI opened the Crossfire Hurricane investigation as an assessment and, in turn, gathered and analyzed data in concert with the information from the Clinton Plan intelligence, it is likely that the information received would have been examined, at a minimum, with a more critical eye," the report continued.
Durham, in his report, said the FBI "failed to act on what should have been—when combined with other incontrovertible facts— a clear warning sign that the FBI might then be the target of an effort to manipulate or influence the law enforcement process for political purposes during the 2016 presidential election."
 
Uh oh, looks like President Obummer may feel some heat from the South Florida grand jury. Now he will likely be able to claim Presidential immunity from any criminal charges but should the evidence show, his eternal reputation will take a massive hit. And that is an insult I doubt the former egotist-in-chief could tolerate.







'Grand conspiracy' probe seeks to prove cabal of 'deep state' Democrats led by Obama tried to destroy Trump

Summarize
A Trump-appointed federal prosecutor in Miami has launched a probe into a 'grand conspiracy' by Democrats led by Barack Obama to destroy Trump's political ambitions.
Jason Reding Quinones, US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, has subpoenaed at least 30 Obama officials involved with an investigation into Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, The New York Times reported.
The Miami probe follows up on a far right theory that Obama officials used the 'hoax' investigation in an in attempt to jail Trump after the 2016 election.
Quinones has now issued more than two dozen subpoenas, some to officials who took part in the Russia inquiry. So far, they include ex-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former FBI agent Peter Strzok and ex-FBI lawyer Lisa Page.
Since he launched the controversial probe at least two prosecutors have quit their jobs when they were asked to join, according to MSNBC.
Quinones has responded by inviting staff within the office to join the new unit and take on the 'anti-Trumpers,' Bloomberg claimed.
In a rare move, the US attorney has called a meeting Monday of dozens of career prosecutors in the major crimes unit.
'Everyone is on pins and needles,' a source told MSNBC.
Furthermore, a grand jury has been empaneled in the district on January 12, with speculation that more indictments against the Democrat officials will take place.
A Trump appointed federal prosecutor is set to go after Democrats who have worked against Donald Trump , including potentially former President Barack Obama
A Trump appointed federal prosecutor is set to go after Democrats who have worked against Donald Trump , including potentially former President Barack Obama
The case follows up on a long-held theory of conservatives : that Obama worked to stop Trump by trying to tie him to election interference on behalf of Vladimir Putin
The case follows up on a long-held theory of conservatives : that Obama worked to stop Trump by trying to tie him to election interference on behalf of Vladimir Putin
'Justice is coming,' read a post by Mike Davis, a former GOP Senate staffer who has been pushing for investigation into the alleged plot to take down Trump. Davis posted the statement along with a photo with Quinones Friday.
The Daily Mail has reached out to the Department of Justice and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida for comment.
In July, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard submitted criminal referrals to the Justice Department for former President Barack Obama and his officials including ex-Intel Chief James Clapper and ex-CIA Director John Brennan.
It appears that the DOJ initially tried to hold the case in Pennsylvania but have since moved it to the southern district in Florida.
Gabbard unveiled evidence claiming that Obama and his team illegally conspired in the lead up to the 2016 presidential election to link Donald Trump to Russia.
'The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government,' Gabbard said in a statement to DailyMail.com.
'Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.
'Their egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic. No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again.'
Jason Reding Quinones, a Trump appointee, has subpoenaed at least 30 officials involved with the 'Russia hoax' investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign
Jason Reding Quinones, a Trump appointee, has subpoenaed at least 30 officials involved with the 'Russia hoax' investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign
Mike Davis, a former GOP Senate staffer who has been pushing for investigation into the plot to take down Trump, posted a photo with Quinones Friday with the caption: 'Justice is coming'
Mike Davis, a former GOP Senate staffer who has been pushing for investigation into the plot to take down Trump, posted a photo with Quinones Friday with the caption: 'Justice is coming'
Trump also accused Obama of treason, while the 44th president issued a statement denying all the allegations lodged against him.
'The complicity, the deflection, and the silence of politicians, of the mainstream media, and of those directly implicated into this speaks volumes,' Gabbard said on Saturday.
The former Democrat-turned-Republican also responded to a blistering comeback from Obama over her claims, in which Obama said Gabbard was making 'bizarre allegations' that are a 'weak attempt at distraction' from the Epstein files.
Gabbard countered: 'President Obama’s very carefully worded response that came from his office, again, deflects away from addressing any of the truth that was revealed.
'They would have to admit and actually address the details of their complicity in this or their absolute failure in conducting the most basic responsibilities of, again, asking, where is this intelligence coming from?'
In an X post about her criminal referral, Gabbard said: 'Their goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people.
'No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The integrity of our democratic republic depends on it.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard (pictured) sent criminal referrals to DOJ alleging former President Barack Obama and his officials conspired to create the 'Russian collusion hoax' in July
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard (pictured) sent criminal referrals to DOJ alleging former President Barack Obama and his officials conspired to create the 'Russian collusion hoax' in July
Trump calls Obama guilty of 'treason' and wants to prosecute him
'We are turning over all documents to the DOJ for criminal referral.'
'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' an Obama spokesperson said.
'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.'
The former president's spokesman then turned to Gabbard's report, saying: 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.
'These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio.'
That last lined needled Trump's secretary of state and national security advisor, who was seated next to the president during his extended discourse on Obama and his team.
Some thought her release of documents last month was a tactic to distract from the botched Jeffrey Epstein files review, which has the DOJ reeling with calls for Bondi to resign.
The move was an escalation that takes President Trump's administration a massive step closer to criminally charging Obama and his former administration officials.
A source familiar with the action speculated to the Daily Mail that the criminal referrals Bondi is acting on are likely for John Brennan and James Comey.
Attorney General Pam Bondi had directed a U.S. prosecutor to convene a grand jury
Attorney General Pam Bondi had directed a U.S. prosecutor to convene a grand jury
Gabbard cited allegations she made last week accusing Obama's White House of pushing a 'hoax' that Trump's 2016 campaign was propped up by the Kremlin
Gabbard cited allegations she made last week accusing Obama's White House of pushing a 'hoax' that Trump's 2016 campaign was propped up by the Kremlin
Trump and Obama have a fraught relationship, although they were spotted chatting in what appeared to be amiable fashion at Jimmy Carter's funeral in January. Trump rode 'birther' conspiracies about Obama to influence in his first successful run for president.
The pushback from Obama's team came after Trump issued an extraordinary call to investigate the ex-president – saying he had been caught 'cold' and accusing his predecessor of 'treason.'
Trump issued his stunning series of attacks on the two-term Democratic president shortly after being asked yet another question about Jeffrey Epstein - the scandal that Obama appeared to be implying that Trump was trying to 'distract' from.
Trump has since threatened to prosecute Obama, saying that Attorney General Pam Bondi should 'act' on the matter – while also indicating it was at her discretion.
'We have a very competent, very good, very loyal to our country person in Pam Bondi – very respected. And she – it's going to be her decision,' Trump said.
But Trump admitted his own Supreme Court victory granting 'presidential immunity' means it's unlikely Obama will be charged with treason over his handling of the 'Russia hoax.'
Even if Obama were to be in trouble, the Supreme Court ruled in a monumental 2024 decision that the President of the United States has immunity from prosecution for official acts in office, in a case argued by lawyers on Trump's behalf.
Trump was asked if 'presidential immunity' would apply to Obama and the president didn't deny it, going as far as to say he'd done his predecessor a favor.
'He has done criminal acts, no question about it. But he has immunity and it probably helps him a lot. He owes me big. Obama owes me big,' Trump said.
The ex-president's team argued in late 2023 that Trump, and any president, must have absolute immunity from prosecution over actions taken while in office or it could impair important decision-making.
 
"But Trump admitted his own Supreme Court victory granting 'presidential immunity' means it's unlikely Obama will be charged with treason over his handling of the 'Russia hoax.'

Even if Obama were to be in trouble, the Supreme Court ruled in a monumental 2024 decision that the President of the United States has immunity from prosecution for official acts in office, in a case argued by lawyers on Trump's behalf.

Trump was asked if 'presidential immunity' would apply to Obama and the president didn't deny it, going as far as to say he'd done his predecessor a favor."

It doesn't really matter if Obama gets imunity. What matters is the truth of his "Crimess" are proven and made public
 
It doesn't really matter if Obama gets imunity. What matters is the truth of his "Crimess" are proven and made public

:applause: :thewave: :applause:

Absolutely agree.

Exposing the criminal truth is what we need.

And that will disgrace him for eternity.
 
Top