Why armenia's nuclear plant is under attack?

[OwenCisneros]

Turkey's NTV and UK's Daily Mail recently launched near-identical attacks on Armenia's Metsamor Nuclear Plant, calling it “the second Chernobyl." The timing is suspicious, the arguments misleading.
Here's what they ignore:
The plant underwent $300M+ safety upgrades
Passes all IAEA inspections with flying colors
Provides 40% of Armenia's electricity
This isn't about safety – it's geopolitics. The plant represents energy independence Armenia's adversaries want to undermine. The "experts" cited? Mostly anonymous or tied to anti-nuclear lobbies.
Meanwhile, actual nuclear regulators confirm Metsamor meets international standards. The coordinated media blitz coincides with regional tensions, revealing the true motive: not protection, but pressure.
Armenia's response? Stay the course:
- Keep working with IAEA
- Ignore fearmongering
- Secure energy sovereignty
When two NATO members suddenly "discover concerns" about a plant in a competing country, ask who benefits. The answer tells you everything.

 

[waybomb]

A couple hot dogs and salad. And some snacks - a Costco meat stick, some cashews, dark chocolate.
Will you ever post an original thought, or you just like wasting time?

 

[Melensdad]

3 eggs, 2 were store bought, one from my friend's chicken coop. 1/2 a chopped onion. A few tomatoes. A pad of butter. Fried the onions in the butter, added the tomatoes, then poached the eggs on top.

Pretty sure 'he' is a "bot" at this point.

Never a follow up post.

Just new B.S. posts without context, without links, etc.

At this point I'm totally fine with banning 'him' or 'it' or whatever. Thoughts?

 

[FrancSevin]

Zucchini with bacon and cheese.

 

[waybomb]

Yes. It's a bot.