Sure I could but you wouldn't accept them as good regardless. So arguing this point is a waste really. You won't accept facts unless the agree with your point of view sighing the source, or what ever. This discussion has now run its course without solving anything and none of the forum discussion will. I don't need to vent my hate as it seems many here do have to do.
So you're jus' not gonna?
That's a shame. Because there are some positives.
On health care, he has insisted on removing the pre existing condition as an impediment.
I like the option to keep kids on a program until 26 years old. Specialy if you are housing them through College.
On Foreign issues;
He has had no hesitation in putting to death those who would harm or threaten our citizens abroad. I cite the Pirates off of Somalia.
He has targeted known terrorist and enemies of the STATE and sent ordinace or surgical strike teams to kill them as well.
Banking,
He has actualy tried to improve cash flow to the banks so they could lend.
He has helped the Wall street crowd restore much of the strenght of 401 and pension portfolios.
He has restored some of the auto manufacturing under US ownership.
In a reprise of Katrina,called Isaac, he stayed clear and therefore politics did not make worse, for those poor souls involved, a bad situation.
He has brought to a head the abcess we all know as the Iran/Isreal conflict that has festered our world for 70 years. That fever will likely break on his watch. A good thing if the brinkmanship finaly settles without bloodshed. A bad thing if it does not. But continuing on a course of continued brinksmanship, most assuredly bad.
See, that wasn't so hard.
I cannot agree with all his methods, but I cannot say these were bad things. In fact they easily meet the level of good things. I would suggest you search the record of the man you support so blindly and see what you might find.
Term limits meant Bush/ Cheney had to leave after 2008. Certainly the left is proud of something besides defeating GWB43?