Brian, using your original calculation, but substituting my 20% depreciation for the Mahindra, pegged the "value" of that tractor at $11, 038. It sold for $11,000. I'd say your formula is pretty darn good . . . it is based on the assumption that the tractor's original selling price was about $14,500.
We will see more with the Kioti, but I have a much better grip on Kioti prices. In fact, a darn good price on a CK30 gear, FEL is going to be right at $15,000. It would not surprise me if the original price was a as high as $16,000. So we have a very good handle on the price range. With the unit on Ebay, we also know it to be a low hour machine, and only 1 year old.
I suggest we stick with your formula but use the 20% depreciation again and see if it sells. Using your formula, my 20% depreciation, and a presumed $15,000 starting price, the "value" of that CK is going to be about $12,810. The starting bid price is $13,000. That is not a 'bad' deal, but not a good one based on the formula.
Again, we are talking about minor-brand tractors with the 20% depreciation figure. I'd like to run the same numbers on some 1 to 3 year old Big-3 brands. Perhaps taking my TC out of the running since mine actually went up in value. Then again, if mine went up in value so did everyone else's who bought that model, so leaving mine in the mix would be valid. We'd just need a large sample to test the validity. And we'd also want to get numbers from Dargo. If I recall correctly he traded/sold 3 of his Big-3 tractors for at and above his original purchase prices and he kept those machines for 1 to 3 years. Thinking about it, maybe your formula is not valid for Big-3 brands under 4 years old???
We will see more with the Kioti, but I have a much better grip on Kioti prices. In fact, a darn good price on a CK30 gear, FEL is going to be right at $15,000. It would not surprise me if the original price was a as high as $16,000. So we have a very good handle on the price range. With the unit on Ebay, we also know it to be a low hour machine, and only 1 year old.
I suggest we stick with your formula but use the 20% depreciation again and see if it sells. Using your formula, my 20% depreciation, and a presumed $15,000 starting price, the "value" of that CK is going to be about $12,810. The starting bid price is $13,000. That is not a 'bad' deal, but not a good one based on the formula.
Again, we are talking about minor-brand tractors with the 20% depreciation figure. I'd like to run the same numbers on some 1 to 3 year old Big-3 brands. Perhaps taking my TC out of the running since mine actually went up in value. Then again, if mine went up in value so did everyone else's who bought that model, so leaving mine in the mix would be valid. We'd just need a large sample to test the validity. And we'd also want to get numbers from Dargo. If I recall correctly he traded/sold 3 of his Big-3 tractors for at and above his original purchase prices and he kept those machines for 1 to 3 years. Thinking about it, maybe your formula is not valid for Big-3 brands under 4 years old???

I really think that eBay doesn't give a rat's ass about scams on their site. As long as they are paid for their auctions, they're happy. 




, I now step down..........