• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

CNN drops to last place among Cable News Networks

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
Wow, I would have never suspected they were in this much trouble.
CNN Drops to Last Place Among Cable News Networks
By BILL CARTER
http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/26/cnn-drops-to-last-place-among-cable-news-networks/

CNN, which invented the cable news network more than two decades ago, will hit a new competitive low with its prime-time programs in October, finishing fourth – and last – among the cable news networks with the audience that all the networks rely on for their advertising.

The official monthly numbers will be finalized at 4 p.m. Monday and will include results from Friday. CNN executives conceded that will not change the competitive standing for the month. CNN will still be last in prime time.

That means CNN’s programs were behind not only Fox News and MSNBC, but even its own sister network HLN (formerly Headline News.) Three of its four shows between 7 and 11 p.m. finished fourth and last among the cable news networks. That was the first time CNN had finished that poorly with its prime-time shows.

The results demonstrate once more the apparent preference of viewers for opinion-oriented shows from the news networks in prime time.

CNN has steered opinion hosts like Nancy Grace to HLN, while maintaining more news-oriented shows on CNN itself. When news events are not being intensely followed, CNN executives acknowledge, viewers seem to be looking for partisan views more than objective coverage.

Individually, the CNN shows were beaten resoundingly by all the Fox News programs, but also lost to all of the MSNBC programs, including a repeat of Keith Olbermann’s 8 p.m. edition of “Countdown,” which beat the 10 p.m. hour of CNN’s signature prime-time program, “Anderson Cooper 360.”

Mr. Cooper had 211,000 viewers to 223,000 for Mr. Olbermann’s repeat. That meant Mr. Cooper finished fourth and last in the 10 p.m. hour because, besides being well behind the leader, Greta Van Susteren, who had 538,000 viewers, he was also beaten by a repeat of Nancy Grace’s 8 p.m. show on HLN, which averaged 222,000.

For the month, CNN averaged 202,000 viewers between the ages of 25 and 54 – the group that television news organizations use as their basis of success because of their advertising sales. That was far behind the dominant leader, Fox News, which averaged 689,000. But it also trailed MSNBC, which had 250,000 viewers in that group and HLN, which had 221,000.

The only CNN show from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. that did not finish last was Larry King, which was third, ahead of the new Joy Behar show on HLN. But Sean Hannity’s show on Fox News had a huge lead with 659,000 viewers in that age group. Second was Rachel Maddow on MSNBC with 242,000.
Mr. King averaged 224,000 and Ms. Behar 181,000.

At 7 p.m. CNN’s host, Lou Dobbs was fourth, barely beaten by Jane Velez Mitchell on HLN, 166,000 to 162,000. The big winner was Shepard Smith on Fox with 465,000 viewers. Second was Chris Matthews and “Hardball” on MSNBC, with 179,000 viewers.

CNN’s performance was worst in the 8 p.m. hour. Bill O’Reilly on Fox News continued his long dominance with the biggest numbers of any host, 881,000 viewers. Mr. Olbermann, with his first-run program, was second with 295,000. Close behind was the first edition of Ms. Grace’s show with 269,000. Campbell Brown on CNN trailed with only 162,000.

CNN executives emphasized that the network continues to draw more viewers than all its competitors except Fox News when all hours of the day are counted.

CNN released a statement Monday saying, “CNN’s ratings are always going to be more dependent on the news environment, much more so than opinion-based programming especially in prime time.”​
 
I don't understand...Obama said that Fox is NOT a news organization, so how can it get ratings higher than the "TRUE" news organization? Something must be wrong with the way they log viewers. Does Obama know his minions have been relegated to the basement?
 
Fox is kicking their a$$ and obama can't help them, no matter what dumb BS he pulls. If Fox were to back some strong independents in next years elections they would stand a good chance of breaking the 2 party stranglehold.
 
Fox is kicking their a$$ and obama can't help them, no matter what dumb BS he pulls. If Fox were to back some strong independents in next years elections they would stand a good chance of breaking the 2 party stranglehold.



I would think that would be the best thing Fox could do. It would no longer be recognized as the media of the Repubs.
 
I would think that would be the best thing Fox could do. It would no longer be recognized as the media of the Repubs.

Right now it seems that Fox is the only Media of the "Republic"... the rest have gone so far... they have "Left" the building...

People are tire of "Business as usual" and are starting to pay attention and it will be an interesting 2010 election cycle to say the least...

IMHO... Throw them all out!
 
If they are in office now they are part of the problem. Vote them all out and start fresh with some common sense.
 
Right now it seems that Fox is the only Media of the "Republic"... the rest have gone so far... they have "Left" the building...

People are tire of "Business as usual" and are starting to pay attention and it will be an interesting 2010 election cycle to say the least...

IMHO... Throw them all out!



:agree:


If Tim Pawlenty runs 2012 I may vote for him. It would put me on the fence.
 
Top