A manager for the TSA has some explaining to do. Perhaps its nothing more than a sick joke but honestly the TSA has become pretty intrusive and pilots and travelers alike are beginning to complain.
The TSA didn't create this graphic, but one of their managers proudly displays it for passengers to see at this airport. Our liberty being raped is just a joke to them. The full body scanners have an alternative, but its pretty clear that the opt out procedure is being made intentionally unpleasant for one simply purpose, to herd people through the full body scanners.
TSA Desktop Image Makes Joke of Cavity Searching Children
The TSA didn't create this graphic, but one of their managers proudly displays it for passengers to see at this airport. Our liberty being raped is just a joke to them. The full body scanners have an alternative, but its pretty clear that the opt out procedure is being made intentionally unpleasant for one simply purpose, to herd people through the full body scanners.
TSA Desktop Image Makes Joke of Cavity Searching Children
. . .Since the introduction of airport scanners, there have been countless complaints regarding privacy issues.
Earlier this year, a TSA employee in Miami was arrested after he physically assaulted a co-worker who had joked about the size of his penis.
In March, a TSA worker who conducted so-called patdowns was charged with multiple child sex crimes targeting an underage girl. “The bust outraged privacy and passenger advocates who say it justifies their fears about Logan International Airport’s full-body scanner,” the Boston Herald reported.
. . .
As the neocon Jeffrey Goldberg wrote in late October, the TSA considers the backscatter scanners and the “opt-out” manual search comical. Goldberg asked a TSA officer if the new Department of Homeland Security guidelines include a cavity search. “No way. You think Congress would allow that?” the TSA employee responded.
In addition, the Atlantic’s Goldberg was told by the TSA agent directly that pat downs were made increasingly invasive not for any genuine security reason, but to make the experience so uncomfortable for the traveler that they would prefer to use the body scanner, despite the fact that scientists at Columbia University and the Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety, along with other scientific bodies, have all warned that the devices increase the risk of developing cancer. . .

