• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Soros PANICS as Woke D.A. RECALLED in SAN FRANCISCO!!!

300 H and H

Bronze Member
GOLD Patron
10:15 min.


Dr. Steve Turley

880K subscribers
George Soros is panicking as he begins to see his beloved progressive DAs collapse, starting in San Francisco! We’re going to look at the stunning recall election yesterday that just ousted one of America’s most woke district attorneys, we’re going to see how San Francisco is actually getting a bit red-pilled in the process, and make sure to stick with me to the very end of this video when we’ll explore the political ramifications of all this for our nation as a whole..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sanity in San Fran?
Who knew?
Red wave in coming!!! :tiphat:
 
Sanity in San Fran?
Who knew?
Red wave in coming!!! :tiphat:
The guy who is in line to replace the disgraced and now recalled D.A. is also an uber liberal.

My guess is that there will be very little effective change. There will be talk of tougher prosecution, just long enough to lock him into the spot. But it won't last. These are liberals, they lie. They always lie. In their mind it is OK to lie if it helps them to achieve their goals.
 
For whatever it is worth, this story is from San Franscisco


DA Chesa Boudin recalled. San Francisco voters’ message to America: This is us.

Out-of-town media with their elbow on the pulse of San Francisco prepare to tell us what the recall of DA Chesa Boudin *really* means

by Joe Eskenazi June 8, 2022
Out-of-town media with their elbow on the pulse of San Francisco prepare to tell us what the recall of DA Chesa Boudin *really* means
San Francisco is a mid-sized North American city. It has almost exactly the same population as Columbus, Ohio. It’s about 15 percent larger than Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Those two cities, for good or ill, don’t captivate the national imagination. But this one does. You don’t hear about “Columbus values” or a “Winnipeg liberal,” but “San Francisco” does serve as a modifier. “San Francisco” is a metonym. Things happen everywhere, but in San Francisco, Things Matter.
As such, in 2014, four Smart cars were tipped over in San Francisco in the course of a week and it became fodder for international news stories. And that was odd: People flip over Smart cars enough there’s even a term for it: “Smart tipping.” All it takes are large men, small cars, too much alcohol and not enough brainpower; San Francisco’s hilly streets probably help, too.
But those stories searched for deeper meanings behind all this. Because in San Francisco, Things Matter; surely, this Means Something.
In the present day, veteran city operatives backed by oodles of cash from extremely wealthy funders and their PAC have managed to tip over San Francisco’s progressive district attorney.
Despite the fervent behavior on display in the weeks leading up to the election, voters writ large were not worked up: Turnout was paltry. Low turnout was actually probably the last remaining hope for DA Chesa Boudin, as he polled best with high-information, high-propensity voters. But there weren’t enough of them to save the DA: With nearly 128,000 votes tallied (26 percent turnout), he trails by almost exactly a 60-40 split.
It is hard to foresee knowledgeable and grounded reactions from out-of-town publications — not when two of the big ones have already burnished the liberal bona fides of one of this city’s most prolific establishment kneecappers, or centered a story around the worldview of a clownish GOP mayoral contender, whom it erroneously credited for qualifying the recall.
Yes, San Francisco dumping its progressive DA Means Something. But it doesn’t mean everything, and it doesn’t necessarily validate the pre-existing worldviews of authoritarian TV hosts or Substack opinion-havers for whom San Francisco serves as an allegory, concept and modifier more than as a city.
San Franciscans’ hearty rejection of Boudin Means Something, and says something about the state of criminal justice reform and limits of liberalism. . .

STORY CONTINUES AT THE LINK ABOVE
 
Soros lost 1 battle but he is winning the war.

Soros tied/backed prosecutors are spread all across the US in big cities and small. Rural and urban.

Today from the NYPost newspaper, they outline the reach of Soros.




How George Soros’ billions are remaking America’s justice system

Jason Johnson and
How much exactly does “social justice” cost?
Liberal billionaire George Soros spent at least $40 million over the last decade to answer that question, according to our latest research. Those millions helped elect scores of progressive prosecutors bent on remaking the criminal justice system to Soros’ liking.
It’s not to Americans’ liking, as San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin’s recall Tuesday shows. Soros didn’t fund Boudin directly, but he donated to an anti-recall PAC. And Boudin is the first face on the “Meet the Movement” page of the Soros-funded Fair and Just Prosecution, whose conferences he’s attended.
From 2014 to 2021, Soros’ $40 million in campaign spending helped elect so-called social justice prosecutors across the country while dozens more benefited . . . Soros-connected DAs’ powers extend across large swaths of the country including 25 of the 50 largest cities and counties, the quiet suburbs of Washington, DC, and central Wisconsin’s rural farming communities.
Across those jurisdictions, these prosecutors are transforming the justice system from within. In the name of reducing perceived inequities, many have unilaterally stopped seeking cash bail, preferring release on recognizance to detention. They refuse to cooperate with immigration authorities, drop felonies down to no-jail misdemeanors and seek lenient sentences for serious (and violent) offenders — often with tragic results.
Meanwhile, they’ve antagonized law enforcement and alienated their own staffs. Seasoned career prosecutors have been leaving en masse — with 75% to 100% turnover recorded across Soros-linked DAs’ offices from Philadelphia to St. Louis and San Francisco.
And those experienced assistant district attorneys are desperately needed as disorder and violent crime soar across America. Although representing only 22% of the country’s population, progressive prosecutors’ offices covered 40% of 2021 homicide cases and a third of all violent crime. . .
In Fairfax, Va., the Soros-funded prosecutor’s leniency abetted murder in the case of a career criminal accused of shooting five homeless men in New York City and Washington, DC, killing two. After breaking into two different Virginia hotels and attempting to abduct and sexually assault a maid, Gerald Brevard faced a sentence of 26 years to life in late 2020. But chief prosecutor Steve Descano cut him a sweetheart deal — dropping the felonies to misdemeanors with only five months behind bars.
In 2019, Descano — with no prior criminal law experience — was vaulted almost single-handedly into office by Soros’ campaign cash. Of the $950,000 in donations candidate Descano received, $659,000 came through two PACs funded either solely or largely by Soros, with another $50,000 coming from groups or individuals closely tied to Soros. That’s $3 out of every $4 linked to a single billionaire’s largesse.
Elsewhere, the amount and share of Soros’ generosity are even larger: San Antonio DA Joe Gonzales took more than $1.4 million from the exclusively Soros-funded Texas Justice and Public Safety PAC in 2018 — nearly 90% of his campaign haul. Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner raked in nearly $3 million from Soros-linked entities for his bids for office in 2017 and 2021. . .
In just 10 races between 2018 and 2021, Soros spent $13 million either directly or through third-party groups to elect his choice.
On top of direct donations, Soros has built a progressive-prosecutor infrastructure with dozens of satellite groups supporting radical DAs in their efforts to upend the criminal justice system. . .
Those investments have paid off beyond the ballot box as well. Soros, who is chief donor and chairman of the Drug Policy Alliance, the nation’s leading advocate for legalizing narcotics, has seen his preferred prosecutors decriminalize drugs . . .
 
There are roughly 75 Soro's backed DAs scattered around the country. More are coming. Soros is not afraid. He is winning.

The woke DA in SanFrancisco was recalled. Nothing will really change. This article from the left wing POLITICO magazine illustrates why. See the link for the full article. But clearly illustrated, one domino may have been removed but the others are still lined up. And more are being elected. From IOWA to California to the Pennsylvania. Big cities and rural counties.


. . .
Yet reformers have counterexamples from which to take heart. Progressive Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner surmounted a challenge last year despite surging homicides and heavy police opposition. Progressive attorney Kimberly Graham advanced on Tuesday in her bid to become the prosecutor for Iowa’s largest county. And in 2020, Californians voted to preserve an earlier ballot initiative that reduced property crime penalties and allowed earlier parole — the types of changes that have become fiercely contested in San Francisco and beyond.

“San Francisco voters are engaged and well-informed. They know that we can have important criminal justice reforms and public safety for all, but that neither was being achieved with Chesa in office.”
San Francisco Democratic Party head Mary Jung
As Boudin was delivering his concession speech, another Bay Area district attorney, Diana Becton, rebuffed a law-enforcement-backed challenge in nearby Contra Costa County after having convicted a former sheriff’s deputy of assault with a firearm for fatally shooting a suspect while on duty. Reform funders spent heavily to defend her. And Pamela Price, another progressive candidate on Tuesday’s ballot, carved out a plurality in Alameda County, home to Oakland, and is bound for a runoff.

“I am moving away from the singular reliance on incarceration as the solution to everything, and I think what’s happened in so many places in these types of races, when you have a progressive-minded prosecutor, is people are being asked to make a false choice about what public safety means,” Becton said in an interview. “We are in this for the long haul,” she added. “It is a movement, like the civil rights movement, and there are some leaders who may fall but we continue to rise.”

Nearly 55 percent of voters statewide — and nearly three-quarters of San Francisco voters — cast their ballots for Bonta, California’s progressive attorney general, giving him a comfortable lead that could preview a November win. Sacramento County District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert — an unaffiliated candidate who spent months trying to link Bonta to Boudin, assailing Bonta for plunging the state into “chaos” — is languishing in fourth place. She was far behind Bonta even in her home county of Sacramento. . .
 
There are roughly 75 Soro's backed DAs scattered around the country. More are coming. Soros is not afraid. He is winning.

The woke DA in SanFrancisco was recalled. Nothing will really change. This article from the left wing POLITICO magazine illustrates why. See the link for the full article. But clearly illustrated, one domino may have been removed but the others are still lined up. And more are being elected. From IOWA to California to the Pennsylvania. Big cities and rural counties.


. . .
Yet reformers have counterexamples from which to take heart. Progressive Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner surmounted a challenge last year despite surging homicides and heavy police opposition. Progressive attorney Kimberly Graham advanced on Tuesday in her bid to become the prosecutor for Iowa’s largest county. And in 2020, Californians voted to preserve an earlier ballot initiative that reduced property crime penalties and allowed earlier parole — the types of changes that have become fiercely contested in San Francisco and beyond.


As Boudin was delivering his concession speech, another Bay Area district attorney, Diana Becton, rebuffed a law-enforcement-backed challenge in nearby Contra Costa County after having convicted a former sheriff’s deputy of assault with a firearm for fatally shooting a suspect while on duty. Reform funders spent heavily to defend her. And Pamela Price, another progressive candidate on Tuesday’s ballot, carved out a plurality in Alameda County, home to Oakland, and is bound for a runoff.

“I am moving away from the singular reliance on incarceration as the solution to everything, and I think what’s happened in so many places in these types of races, when you have a progressive-minded prosecutor, is people are being asked to make a false choice about what public safety means,” Becton said in an interview. “We are in this for the long haul,” she added. “It is a movement, like the civil rights movement, and there are some leaders who may fall but we continue to rise.”

Nearly 55 percent of voters statewide — and nearly three-quarters of San Francisco voters — cast their ballots for Bonta, California’s progressive attorney general, giving him a comfortable lead that could preview a November win. Sacramento County District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert — an unaffiliated candidate who spent months trying to link Bonta to Boudin, assailing Bonta for plunging the state into “chaos” — is languishing in fourth place. She was far behind Bonta even in her home county of Sacramento. . .
Honestly think they have been stealing the state elections for years here in Ca.
 
Honestly think they have been stealing the state elections for years here in Ca.
no, not stealing it

Some of the down-ticket races below the governor, senators, etc draw very little attention. So Soros simply picked the DA office, because it is an easy election but with a lot of long term ability to change the direction of prosecution. Injecting just modest contributions into some of these elections is an easy way to buy name recognition for a candidate that most people don't pay any attention to.

2 or 3 people in the race, 1 of them gets a $20,000 to $40,000 boost in the campaign, when the others have $1000 to $5000 available in their campaign and it is easy to see how they advance ahead of the field.

So it is an easy, cheap way to win an honest election.
 
no, not stealing it

Some of the down-ticket races below the governor, senators, etc draw very little attention. So Soros simply picked the DA office, because it is an easy election but with a lot of long term ability to change the direction of prosecution. Injecting just modest contributions into some of these elections is an easy way to buy name recognition for a candidate that most people don't pay any attention to.

2 or 3 people in the race, 1 of them gets a $20,000 to $40,000 boost in the campaign, when the others have $1000 to $5000 available in their campaign and it is easy to see how they advance ahead of the field.

So it is an easy, cheap way to win an honest election.
Some may be going that way, but there is corruption in our elections here with illegals voting etc.
 
Top