Interesting story.
Nurse suspended, fined for saying men are men, giving Canada's Conservatives new path to victory
Nursing regulator portrays $93,000 fine as a steal for single mother Amy Hamm, given "risk of harm" she caused despite no one claiming to be a victim. Pollievre calls Hamm after not mentioning speech threats in by-election victory speech.
Nursing regulator portrays $93,000 fine as a steal for single mother Amy Hamm, given "risk of harm" she caused despite no one claiming to be a victim. Pollievre calls Hamm after not mentioning speech threats in by-election victory speech.
Pierre Poilievre's political comeback started with his by-election victory Monday to a new seat in Canada's House of Commons after his Conservative Party's stunning reversal of fortune in April elections, prompted by "wacko" Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's resignation.
The Alberta-based party leader's second attempted path to dethrone the Liberals under Mark Carney may now run through gender-ideology disputes in the adjoining province, where expressing the wrong views can imperil a medical license.
Vancouver nurse Amy Hamm's month-long license suspension and $93,639.80 fine, for expressing gender-critical views online and through her billboard praising Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling, didn't get even a vague allusion in Poilievre's victory speech days later. Neither did threats to gender-critical views or speech policing in general.
In a speech focused on crime, gun rights and the economy, the closest Poilievre got was sharing an anecdote from a female prison guard "who was tied up and viciously assaulted by a violent criminal" at the penitentiary where she worked.
But since Wednesday afternoon, the politico known as "Skippy" has shared his own and others' outrage at least three times about the March 13 professional misconduct findingand Aug. 14 penalties against Hamm and what they say about freedom in Canada.
"This is authoritarian censorship," Poilievre wrote on X, sharing a National Post column Monday criticizing the "grotesque attack on free speech" by the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives, whose investigation of Hamm dates back four years. "We must restore free speech and free thinking in a free country," Poilievre said.
A U.K. Telegraph columnist portrayed Hamm's punishment as a turning point for its Commonwealth of Nations sibling, "a case study in Canada’s descent into tyranny."
Poilievre reposted fellow Conservative lawmakers Leslyn Lewis, who questioned whether BC medical professionals can "safely do their job if they are punished for acknowledging biological realities" crucial in medicine, and his predecessor, Andrew Scheer, who quoted English author G.K. Chesterton's 1926 prediction that "secular society" would soon punish objective truth.
Hamm said she spoke to Poilievre on the phone Wednesday. "He is a man who understands the issues regarding protection of our sex-based rights," and "I’m feeling positive about Canada in a way that I haven’t in a long time," she said. (Rowling, who has previously praised Hamm, hasn't spoken about her on X since the penalty was handed down.)
Hamm appealed the finding to the BC Supreme Court in April and is considering appealing the penalty, according to her lawyer Lisa Bildy. The panel agreed with her request to stay the suspension and costs award to BCCNM pending Hamm's decision.
She shared her donation page in light of reader interest, as well as that of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, which is sponsoring her case and says Hamm was punished for speaking while identifying as a nurse in "three articles and one podcast episode."
Last month, Hamm also filed complaints against BCCNM and Vancouver Coast Health, which fired her shortly after the finding, with the BC Human Rights Tribunal. Bildy shared redacted complaints with Just the News after JCCF said it wasn't sure it could legally share them.
The tribunal spurned a former registered nurse and JCCF client in another investigation over pure speech, however, fining Kirsten Olsen $10,000 for privately warning her transgender friend and tenant about a planned mastectomy. She appealed to the Supreme Court.
'Single mother who receives no child support'
STORY CONTINUES AT LINK ABOVE ^^^