• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Another excellent Islamic tradition....

jdwilson44

New member
From the following story on www.msnbc.com : http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11973510/

Some clerics call for killing Afghan Christian

Man on trial for converting from Islam; Bush, Rice weigh in on case

Abdul Rahman, on trial for converting from Islam to Christianity, holds a Bible inside a Kabul court.


Updated: 9:05 a.m. ET March 23, 2006

KABUL, Afghanistan - Senior Muslim clerics said Thursday that an Afghan man on trial for converting from Islam to Christianity should be killed regardless of whether a court decides to free him.
Abdul Rahman, a 41-year-old former medical aid worker, faces the death penalty for becoming a Christian under Afghanistan's Islamic laws.
His trial, which began last week, has caused an international outcry. U.S. President Bush said Wednesday he was "deeply troubled" by the case and expects the country to "honor the universal principle of freedom."


Diplomats say the Afghan government is searching for a way to drop the case, and on Wednesday authorities said Rahman is suspected of being mentally ill and would undergo psychological examinations to see whether he is fit to stand trial.
But four senior clerics interviewed by The Associated Press in their mosques in Kabul said Rahman deserved to be killed for his conversion.
"He is not crazy. He went in front of the media and confessed to being a Christian," said Hamidullah, chief cleric at Haji Yacob Mosque.
"The government is scared of the international community. But the people will kill him if he is freed."
"He is not mad. The government are playing games. The people will not be fooled," said Abdul Raoulf, cleric at Herati Mosque. "This is humiliating for Islam. ... Cut off his head."
Raoulf is considered a moderate cleric in Afghanistan. He was jailed three times for criticizing the Taliban's policies before the hardline regime was ousted by U.S.-led forces in 2001.
Bush 'deeply troubled'
Bush, in a statement Wednesday, said that “I’m troubled when I hear, deeply troubled when I hear, the fact that a person who converted away from Islam may be held to account.”
While not demanding that the trial be stopped and the defendant released, Bush said he wanted to make sure that “people are protected in their capacity to worship.”
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice followed up with a meeting with Afghan Foreign Minister Abdullah Abdullah, whose government is an ally of the United States in the war on terror.
She told him she was deeply troubled by the case and called the prosecution “contrary to universal democratic values,” State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said.
Rice also told Abdullah that those values include freedom of religion, which the United States fought for in Afghanistan and elsewhere, McCormack said.
And she told the foreign minister that the case ran contrary to the Afghan constitution.
Germany, Italy issue statements
The statements by Bush and Rice toughened the U.S. stance in a controversy that has spread beyond South Asia, evoking statements of concern, for instance, in Germany and Italy.
On Tuesday, administration officials expressed respect for Afghanistan’s sovereignty while also registering their concern over the case.
Rahman was arrested last month after his family accused him of becoming a Christian. The conversion is a crime under Afghanistan’s Islamic laws.
Abdullah made no statement after his meeting with Rice, which was not listed on her public schedule.
Here for strategic talks, Abdullah said Tuesday he hoped “through our constitutional process there will be a satisfactory result.” He did not say whether he thought the defendant would be found innocent.
Afghanistan ‘pursuing’ case
On Wednesday, the Afghan embassy responded to expressions of concern with a statement saying the Kabul government “is fully aware of and pursuing the best way to resolve Mr. Rahman’s case judicially.”
“It’s too early to draw a conclusion about the punishment,” the statement said.
Michael Cromartie, chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, said in a statement he had written to Bush to express concern about the trial and the threatened execution of Rahman.
Cromartie told the president that the prosecutor had called Rahman “a microbe (who) should be cut off and removed from the rest of Muslim society and should be killed.”
The Council on American-Islamic Relations issued a statement calling for Rahman’s release. “Religious decisions should be matters of personal choice, not a cause for state intervention,” the Muslim civil liberties group said.
© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Maybe I'll try converting to Islam to see if the Christians come after me, then I'll convert to Hinduism to see if the Islamics come after me, then I'll convert to Buddhism to see if the Hindus come after me. Then I convert to Paganism to see if the Buddhists come after me. Then I'll declare myself an atheist to see if the Pagans come after me. If I'm really lucky they will all show up to kill me at the same time - a big fight will ensue, and they will all kill each other and I will be ok. Probably not though - probably only the Islamics will show up to kill me - what do you think?
 
I do not know if it is because of the instant news that we are getting used to, but personally I think that the whole world is going nuts. The only alternative that I see is that the next time something like this comes up is to pull out our people and nuke the whole area. It may take a few times but I would think that these people would start to get the message after a while.:eek:
 
This is a classic example of what the results are of our intervening in other countries ways of governing there citizens. I don't approve of it, but you can't change their way of thinking and that is what we are trying to do. When we went into Kuwait to free the people from Iraq, it was said that as a result, they were going to become a more democratic type of government and that women would get the right to vote. Once they were freed from the control of Iraq, neither happened. As long as the oil keeps flowing to the US, nothing will ever be said about the way they run their country. If we were to mind our own business and stay out of other countries problems, we would be a lot better off. The money that has been waisted in Iraq would have gone a long way toward solving our own domestic energy needs if it were spent here developing energy alternatives.... Junk....
 
I have to agree that this religion of "love, compassion, and peace" will pretty well have run it's course with world opinion after the nice peaceful demonstrations over some stupid cartoon and now insisting on killing someone if they reject that nice peaceful religion. Most civilized countries who have sent millions of dollars to, and had people die for, the Muslim people have signaled that they may very well pull their people out and cease sending aid to these barbaric countries. If the religion is true, why force the population under the penalty of death to subscribe to it's doctrine?! I knew that people in most Muslim countries were 'required' to be Muslims, but I was not aware it was under the penalty of death.

This makes me wonder if the huge population that is considered to be Muslim really believe. I mean, if you are killed if you mention that you might not believe in ole Muhammad, I doubt that you will have just too many people give their true beliefs. For some reason, this sort of rings of slavery to me. I can't say that I'd support any action or aid to any government that requires it's people to subscribe to the state religion or be killed. I guess maybe I was naive about how radical and paranoid those people are. No wonder their official government line is that they want all western people out.
 
For thousands of years Christians and Muslims have had quite opposing views to one another. It will never change. I hope that those that say go in and nuke them of the planet, only say this in jest as that is as barbaric as are some of the practices they have. We will never understand their ways as they will never understand ours. We should forget their bloody oil and get the hell out of these Muslim countries, defend our borders and leave them alone.
I am an atheist not a Christian, a true democratic society allows me that freedom with out fear of persecution, for that I am thankful.
 
REDDOGTWO said:
I do not know if it is because of the instant news that we are getting used to, but personally I think that the whole world is going nuts. The only alternative that I see is that the next time something like this comes up is to pull out our people and nuke the whole area. It may take a few times but I would think that these people would start to get the message after a while.:eek:

As much as I try to think to myself that what is happening now is no worse than what has happened before at certain points in history it does seem like the world is going a bit nuts.

Just to be safe I recently took my NRA Basic Pistol class and am looking forward to taking Basic Rifle. Because I live in Massachusetts I will not be trusted with anything more lethal than a straw and a wad of paper but at least I will know how to aim. The Kubota has a backhoe on it too so that will come in useful for digging the bomb shelter in my backyard.

:rolleyes:
 
daedong said:
For thousands of years Christians and Muslims have had quite opposing views to one another. It will never change. I hope that those that say go in and nuke them of the planet, only say this in jest as that is as barbaric as are some of the practices they have. We will never understand their ways as they will never understand ours. We should forget their bloody oil and get the hell out of these Muslim countries, defend our borders and leave them alone.
I am an atheist not a Christian, a true democratic society allows me that freedom with out fear of persecution, for that I am thankful.


I find this stuff interesting because you can see public opinion changing from these news stories. We had the Danish cartoons incident a few months ago - which some commentators have said led to the scuttling of the Dubai ports deal here in the US. Now this story comes out - this guy who is sentenced seems like a good person, he worked for an aid agency, came back to get his kids etc, and now is in jail under penalty of death. We have a certain strain of people here in the US who seem to be Islamic apologists and don't quite believe that the bad parts of Islam could really be that bad. If the cartoon thing didn't convince people maybe this will drive it home for everybody except the most ignorant. The Danish cartoon thing was something that woke me up a little - I pay much more attention to this stuff now than I had previously.



I have spent a decent amount of time on some forums at http://forum.newspaperindex.com and had some good debates with Muslims there where I point out things like Sharia law puts Muslims who convert under a death penalty - so how could your religion be considered one of peace? Some of the points that get made in that forum `against the western world are good too - and many of them match the things we talk about here on this forum. In the end though I guess I am like you - I don't attend church with any regularity and am probably best described as an atheist or an agnostic. In the US at least I am allowed to live without much religious intervention - I am about 99% sure that I would never be allowed to live like this in any country where Islam is the dominant religion. If Christianity gets you death I wonder what atheism or agnostisicm gets you?
 
jdwilson44 said:
If Christianity gets you death I wonder what atheism or agnostisicm gets you?

I understand it is 5 years of re-education and a lifetime of 'probation'. If you then violate the probation (mention that you may not believe), then it is death.
 
Dargo said:
I understand it is 5 years of re-education and a lifetime of 'probation'. If you then violate the probation (mention that you may not believe), then it is death.


Well at least they are fair :whistle:


Christianity certainly has a checkered past with regards to tolerance in some areas of the world but as the world is now (at least reasonably) civilized you'd think putting people to death because of their ideas are different would be something we could put behind us.
 
Top