• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

2024 "Best" Satellite 2-way Communicators

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
POST #7 below may be a contributing factor in your decision making process as it discusses what many articles ignore.

There is a new kid on the block this year from Motorola, actually arrived on the market during 2023. Looks like it might be too early to adopt it, some of the tests look like its ability to reach a signal are questionable, but the concept shows promise. The new device is from Motorola and it does not use either the Globalstar (SPOT) or the Iridium (Garmin, Zoleo, BivyStick, etc) satellites. The tiny new Motorola devices reaches out to multiple satellites from both Inmarsat and Echostar, at least in theory, but it didn't rank in the Top 5 so you need to go article at the link below.

Garmin also has a new device, the Messenger, which seems to rank in the Top 5 in all reviews. The Garmin inReach Mini was upgraded to the Mini2 and that is an improved version of a favorite top pick, which replaces the Mini at the top of most lists.

SWITCH BACK TRAVEL has a long article that covers more than the top 5, you can follow the link below for the full article.



From the folks at SWITCH BACK TRAVEL the top 5:


Best Overall Satellite Messenger

Garmin inReach Mini 2 satellite messenger
Category: Two-way
Weight: 3.5 oz.
Satellite network: Iridium
What we like: Lightweight, great battery life, and fully functional as a standalone device.
What we don’t: Larger upfront cost than the options below.
Most backcountry enthusiasts are looking for a streamlined, long-lasting satellite messenger that enables them to communicate from the comfort of their smartphone, and the Garmin inReach Mini 2 puts it all together better than most. At just 3.5 ounces, the Mini is one of the lightest devices here, but it’s also among the most capable. You get connection to the Iridium satellite network (widely accepted as the most reliable coverage), an impressive battery life, and a small display and relatively easy-to-learn interface that keep the Mini fully functional even if your smartphone bites the dust. Tack on features like weather forecasting, location tracking and sharing, and maps and navigation via the Garmin Explore app, and the Mini 2 is the full package for most backcountry-goers.
Compared to the first-gen Mini, the Mini 2 offers an improved battery life, expanded storage, higher resolution display, connection with a greater variety of satellite systems, and a more powerful USB-C connection. And with a recent firmware update, it's also compatible with Garmin’s new Messenger app for seamless communication between satellite, Wi-Fi, and cellular networks—a great feature for those who frequently move in and out of service, including thru-hikers, international travelers, and those who live in rural areas. It’s worth noting that unlike many offerings below, the Mini 2 can be used without a smartphone, which is a nice safety measure to have if your phone malfunctions or loses power. It’s the complete package for most, and it’s for good reason that we see the InReach Mini 2 being used in the field more than any other device here.

Best Budget Satellite Messenger

ZOLEO Satellite Communicator
Category: Two-way
Weight: 5.3 oz.
Satellite network: Iridium
What we like: A two-way messenger for just $200; messages can be up to 900 characters long.
What we don’t: Heavy and bulky; limited data plans.
Zoleo's satellite communicator is an appealing budget pick that manages to pack in a functional array of capabilities that belie its $200 price tag. Like the devices above, you get two-way messaging via a smartphone app, as well as unlimited location tracking and sharing, weather forecasts via AerisWeather, connection to the Iridium satellite network, and SOS support from GEOS (the standard bearer for search and rescue coordination). The app also allows messaging over cellular and Wi-Fi networks, making it easy to dip in and out of the wilderness with minimal gaps in communication. All told, for half the price of the inReach Mini 2 above, the Zoleo packs quite the punch.
There are some tradeoffs to opting for such a budget-oriented model, and the most notable is the Zoleo's fairly bulky build—at 5.3 ounces, it’s considerably heavier and less sleek than the devices above. What’s more, unlimited check-ins and location tracking aren’t included in the standard plans (they cost an extra $6/month), and the Zoleo app does not feature maps and navigation. Finally, unlike the competition, Zoleo charges a $4/month suspension fee, and its plans are fairly limited (you don't get the option of saving with an annual plan). But for just $150 at the time of publishing, the Zoleo is a pretty impressive value, and penny pinchers will especially appreciate that you can pack 900 characters into each message (compared to Garmin’s 160).

Best Satellite Messenger for Organized Groups

Bivy Stick satellite messenger device
Category: Two-way
Weight: 3.5 oz.
Satellite network: Iridium
What we like: Inexpensive start-up price and helpful GroupTrack feature.
What we don’t: Unrefined app and expensive pay structure.
Another solid satellite messenger offering is the Bivy Stick, from Salt Lake City-based ACR Electronics. In many ways, this device functions very similarly to the Zoleo above: Lacking a screen, it operates in conjunction with a smartphone app to send and receive messages (via satellite, Wi-Fi, or cellular networks), receive weather forecasts, share your location, and more. It’s also a great tool for recreational groups or off-the-grid camps: The GroupTrack feature allows easy communication between devices in the field, along with a helpful tracking tool for those connected to the internet back at basecamp (keep in mind this service will cost you a premium at $55/month, per device). And at $300, it’ll save you $100 over the upfront cost of the inReach Mini above, too.
All that said, we’ve found the Bivy Stick to be a little disappointing in practice—the app is very busy and unrefined, and the device often was slower to send and receive messages when tested back-to-back with the Garmin. What’s more, Bivy’s subscription will cost you more to start up than other plans, with a minimum 3-month commitment to the Plus Plan at $30/month or higher. But if the GroupTrack function appeals to you, the Bivy Stick will certainly get the job done.

Best of the Rest

Garmin inReach Messenger (satellite communicator)
Category: Two-way
Weight: 4 oz.
Satellite network: Iridium
What we like: Double the battery life of the inReach Mini 2; sleek shape is great for remote frontcountry use.
What we don’t: Tiny screen makes standalone use difficult.
Garmin has long been the largest innovator in the satellite messenger space, and they’re still at it with the release of their inReach Messenger. The Messenger was released along with the Messenger app (yes, another app from Garmin), which works with Wi-Fi, cellular, and satellite networks to provide seamless messaging for those who dip in and out of service. What’s more, the device offers about twice the battery life of the already impressive inReach Mini 2, and can also be used as a power bank to charge your smartphone or other electronics (of course, take care with this feature, as you don’t want to drain the Messenger).
Since the release of the Messenger, Garmin has updated the Mini 2’s firmware, which is now compatible with the Messenger app as well for seamless messaging across networks. In other words, the two inReach devices offer largely the same feature sets. That said, the Messenger is intended more for remote frontcountry use: The flat shape will be more at home on the dash of a vehicle or boat than hanging from a backpack, and the tiny screen won’t be an issue when you have your smartphone charged and ready, too (you can type on the Messenger, but the screen is miniscule). And for $100 less than the Mini 2, we don’t blame you if you bring it along on backcountry adventures too (the increased battery life is a major bonus). All told, the newest inReach is a great addition to the lineup, giving devices like the Zoleo and Bivy Stick above a true run for their money.

SPOT X satellite messenger device
Category: Two-way
Weight: 7 oz.
Satellite network: Globalstar
What we like: An easy to use standalone device with a full QWERTY keyboard.
What we don’t: Heavy, sticky keys, and Globalstar’s coverage isn’t as comprehensive as Iridium’s.
SPOT devices were made famous (or infamous) early on for their implication in accidental SOS calls and non-emergent rescue initiations, but they’ve come a long way since their beginnings in 2007. Their X here is a two-way messenger most similar to the Garmin inReach Mini above in terms of design and features. Unlike the Mini, however, the X boasts a full QWERTY keyboard, meaning you can type messages, navigate between waypoints with the built-in compass, and scroll through text chains without the need for a smartphone. And along with the SOS button, you also get the option of SPOT’s S.O.V. (“Save Our Vehicle”) feature, which sends your alert out to Nation Safe Drivers for timely vehicle assistance (additional subscription required)—all for $150 less than the Mini.
However, after using the SPOT X as our primary satellite messenger this past summer, we hesitate to give it glowing reviews, especially given the impressive competition above. For one, the keys are sticky (our “a” key was almost worthless) and the computer slow, which makes for onerous typing. To be fair, the X does pair with a smartphone, but at 7 ounces for the device alone, that’s a fairly heavy combination. Second, SPOT uses the Globalstar satellite network rather than Iridium, which proved to be noticeably slower and less reliable in our testing (you can see a coverage map here). And to make matters worse, SPOT’s subscription fees are some of the more expensive available (you'll pay about $80 just to start up a monthly flex plan). All told, the SPOT X will likely get the job done when you need it, but it simply doesn’t measure up against the more refined messengers above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc
OUTDOOR GEAR LAB has a slightly different list in their Top 5 reviews.

I looked at several different articles, one this that stuck out, the new Garmin Messenger is in the Top 5 in all the reviews. The new Motorola is NOT in the Top 5 in the reviews. The SPOT X, despite its age, and despite the criticism of its larger size, retains a perennial Top 5 spot in every review I've seen.


Again, there are many links in these articles to take you to more specific product information. Follow the various links.





The 5 Best Satellite Messengers of 2024

You want, or need, to communicate from beyond cell signal. We test the products and services and report back, on equipment from Motorola, Garmin, SPOT, ACR, Zoleo, and more.

Some tested satellite messengers. Left to right: Motorola Defy, Garmin Gpsmap, someway, PLB1, inReach Mini, Zoleo, Spot Gen4, inReach Messenger, SpotX, BivyStick.​
Credit: Jediah Porter​

Best Overall Beacon with Custom Messaging

Garmin inReach Messenger

garmin inreach messenger personal locator beacon review
  • SOS/Emergency Messaging 10.0
  • Non-Emergency Messaging 10.0
  • Signal Coverage 7.0
  • Ease of Use 6.0
  • Portability 9.0
Weight: 4.0 oz | Battery Life: Up to 28 days
REASONS TO BUY
Small
On-device messaging
Seamless messaging
REASONS TO AVOID
Not the smallest on the market
Tiny screen and limited on-device interface
For years, the same satellite messenger kept winning our highest award. That product is still very, very good. But we find its sibling, the newer Garmin inReach Messenger, slightly better. This device has a long battery life, full-function messaging, and uses proven satellite technology. If you're ready to step into the world of personal locator beacons, the inReach Messenger is the one we think is the best for most users.
We must compare the inReach Messenger to the former top award-winning inReach Mini 2. The Messenger displaces the Mini 2 from this award by a very narrow margin, a difference that barely even shows up in our scoring rubric. The features that make the Messenger rise above the Mini 2 are longer battery life and a larger antenna. However, the Mini 2 is half an ounce lighter and includes some basic navigational attributes that the Messenger does not have. If weight and navigation are important, you might choose the Mini 2 instead of the Messenger. Otherwise, we think the Messenger respectably ekes out the win. It probably isn't worth upgrading if you already have an inReach Mini 2 (or even the original Mini, sans the "2" qualifier). Garmin has been diligent, so far, in making incremental upgrades such that the previous iterations are not appreciably outdated.
Garmin's refined inReach Messenger is a legitimate upgrade from their other offerings. It isn't perfect, but advancements do seem to be plateauing after a heady few recent years.​
Credit: Jediah Porter​

" data-reader-unique-id="94" style="color: rgb(65, 110, 210); max-width: 100%;">personal locator beacon - best overall beacon with custom messaging

Garmin's refined inReach Messenger is a legitimate upgrade from their other offerings. It isn't perfect, but advancements do seem to be plateauing after a heady few recent years.
Credit: Jediah Porter

Occasional Activation Bang for the Buck

ACR Bivy Stick

acr bivy stick personal locator beacon review
  • SOS/Emergency Messaging 10.0
  • Non-Emergency Messaging 8.0
  • Signal Coverage 7.0
  • Ease of Use 7.0
  • Portability 9.0
Weight: 3.6 oz | Battery Life: up to 120 hours
REASONS TO BUY
Compact
Global coverage
Flexible activation
REASONS TO AVOID
Limited on-device functionality
No seamless messaging
Not long ago, the ACR Bivy Stick was an exciting "shake-up" on the market. It has now achieved a sort of reliable maturity. Most recently, the original "start-up" product and branding were acquired by a much bigger player in the wilderness communication market: ACR. We haven't yet used the latest ACR version, though we've confirmed that it is functionally the same as the Bivy Stick Blue that we have tested (and photographed) for a while. Regardless of its branding (and device color scheme), this product is a solid device employing proven technology and services: the flexible activation and ever-more-competitive pricing scheme combined with our other high-value options.
Prices and activation/subscription protocols are apt to change. We are sure they will. Subscription service innovation is ongoing in all corners of the consumer market. Subscription pricing and configuration can and do change after your initial purchase. If you activate it once a year, the ACR Bivy Stick has one of the lowest 5-year "cost of ownership" measures for global coverage and two-way messaging. Since many will use their wilderness communication device that way, it earns an award among the other value options. If in-device two-way messaging isn't a priority, the Zoleo is another affordable option — just know that you need your smartphone and the Zoleo app to compose messages.
Read more: ACR Bivy Stick review
Testing the Bivy Stick in the Tetons during the fall ski season.​
Credit: Jediah Porter​

" data-reader-unique-id="189" style="color: rgb(65, 110, 210); max-width: 100%;">personal locator beacon - occasional activation bang for the buck

Testing the Bivy Stick in the Tetons during the fall ski season.
Credit: Jediah Porter

Best Value for Year-Round Global Coverage

Somewear Global Hotspot

somewear global hotspot personal locator beacon review
  • SOS/Emergency Messaging 10.0
  • Non-Emergency Messaging 6.0
  • Signal Coverage 7.0
  • Ease of Use 7.0
  • Portability 8.0
Weight: 4.1 oz | Battery Life: 1000 messages
REASONS TO BUY
Compact and light
Flexible and affordable subscription options
It uses a proven satellite network and SOS dispatch
REASONS TO AVOID
No messaging without a smartphone
Long 30-minute tracking interval
The Somewear Global Hotspot is a piece of hardware from a smaller company that uses a proven satellite network and SOS monitoring service. The device itself is compact, light, and low profile. It is slightly larger than others, but not by enough to matter. With a small handful of similar devices and services available, the competitors are forced to compete on price. The initial purchase price of the Global Hotspot is similar to other options, but the subscription plans are a little less expensive than average. Depending on how you intend to use your wilderness communicator, the Global Hotspot can be much cheaper than the alternatives. For instance, with their "Plan Ultralight," you can use the Hotspot a few times a month, over five years, for hundreds of dollars less than using another device in the same way.
There are some drawbacks to the Hotspot. Most notably, there is no way to view incoming text messages on the device itself. All you can do with the device alone is turn it off and on, activate tracking, and send an SOS message. The ability to activate tracking from the device is new to the latest version. We tested this new version from late 2021 through late 2022. In comparison, on the inReach Mini 2 and Messenger, you can view or send rudimentary messages directly on the device and through the phone app. Overall, we find the Hotspot to be simple and affordable. We had hardware issues testing the second version, but Somewear Labs' customer service was prompt and effective.
Everything about two-way satellite communications can make your remote expeditions easier. Using the Somewear Hotspot for routine check-ins, weather forecasts, and as an emergency backstop really smooths the process.​
Credit: Jediah Porter​

" data-reader-unique-id="281" style="color: rgb(65, 110, 210); max-width: 100%;">personal locator beacon - best value for year-round global coverage

Everything about two-way satellite communications can make your remote expeditions easier. Using the Somewear Hotspot for routine check-ins, weather forecasts, and as an emergency backstop really smooths the process.
Credit: Jediah Porter

Great Value for SOS Only

Ocean Signal rescueME PLB1

ocean signal rescueme plb1 personal locator beacon review
  • SOS/Emergency Messaging 4.0
  • Non-Emergency Messaging 1.0
  • Signal Coverage 9.0
  • Ease of Use 9.0
  • Portability 8.0
Weight: 4.0 oz | Battery Life: 24 hours
REASONS TO BUY
Dual-frequency SOS transmission
COSPAS-SARSAT is very reliable
No annual fees
Easy to operate one-handed (even with gloves)
REASONS TO AVOID
Lacks 2-way messaging
Lacks non-emergency messaging
If custom messaging is not important to you and you're only looking for an emergency signaling device, the Ocean Signal rescueME PLB1 is your best option. It is a little expensive upfront, but no annual fees or subscription plans are required. It broadcasts a distress signal through two radio channels, 406 MHz and 121.5 MHz. They are sent to a monitored satellite network and a local aircraft distress frequency. This powerful transmission is sent on the military's reliable COSPAS-SARSAT network.
Unfortunately, this personal locator beacon does not confirm in any way that someone has received your distress signal. The PLB1 is an excellent option for pure, personal locator beacon SOS functions and offers a solid value. Still, the two-way messaging of many other options makes them more useful products overall. If you want more messaging functionality, check out the SPOT X, which has a keyboard on the device.
In the event of an emergency, simply deploy the rescueME PLB1's stow-away antenna and push the "SOS" button.​
Credit: Jediah Porter​

" data-reader-unique-id="373" style="color: rgb(65, 110, 210); max-width: 100%;">personal locator beacon - great value for sos only

In the event of an emergency, simply deploy the rescueME PLB1's stow-away antenna and push the "SOS" button.
Credit: Jediah Porter

Best for Standalone Use

SPOT X

spot x personal locator beacon review
  • SOS/Emergency Messaging 10.0
  • Non-Emergency Messaging 8.0
  • Signal Coverage 2.0
  • Ease of Use 7.0
  • Portability 2.0
Weight: 6.8 oz | Battery Life: 240 hours
REASONS TO BUY
2-way messaging
Low initial purchase price
Built-in physical keyboard
REASONS TO AVOID
Bulky
Potential durability issues
The SPOT X fills a small niche. This two-way, satellite-linked, backcountry messaging device works entirely on its own. The built-in physical QWERTY keyboard distinguishes it from all of its competitors. This keyboard allows the user to text readily without linking to a separate, battery-draining device. It can be linked to a smartphone if you prefer a smartphone interface or want that option.
The SPOT X is unique, but it is exceeded in some ways by its close competitors, particularly regarding size and satellite system used. Additionally, we had part of the first (of two) SPOT X antennae we tested come apart. Functionality did not change with this issue, but it's not encouraging. These drawbacks are not at all deal breakers. If that physical keyboard and its benefits appeal to you, there is no reason not to choose the SPOT X. If you don't mind spending a bit more, our favorites are the Garmin inReach Messenger and Garmin inReach Mini 2.

Read more: SPOT X review
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc
One GLARING PROBLEM that I see with ALL the various gear reviews is that none of them are giving a detailed comparison of the various plans and their costs.

I'm going to find some time, hopefully over the next 30 days, to do a plan comparison between the costs to actually use these devices.

Last time I did a comparison what I found was that the SPOT was decidedly cheaper for people who want a plan that gives a wide flexibility in 2 way text communications, don't need Ocean or Africa/Asia coverage, and moderate breadcrumb tracking on an electronic map with lat/lon location pings; as breadcrumb tracking options are varied by plan, the more location pings you choose, the higher the cost plan, but that can be useful if you are on a higher speed vehicle like a motorcycle versus a snowcat or walking on foot. The IRIDIUM devices (Garmin, Zoleo, BivyStick, etc) all had higher costs, far more limited breadcrumb tracking, some offer no breadcrumb tracking at all., but faster transfer speeds and truly full global coverage.

What I found, and what is noted in the OP of this thread, is that there are multiple plans. Some plans offer the ability to turn off and turn on the service, but require an UPCHARGE to use the temporary service. It was NOT worth the money at the time. Paying the uncharge to have the flexibility to suspend your service charge actually can cost more than paying for the service and leaving it on if you choose a 12 month plan. So it is critical to do the actual math! What seems cheaper can cost more.

FOR HARDWARE, it is really hard to choose something other than the GARMIN inReach Mini2 device based on features and durability. The price is steep at $399. The SPOT X is a bulkier option for people who value tracking and communication flexibility, and can frequently be found on sale for under $200.

LINK TO 2024 Service Costs & Features comparison thread:

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Doc
It is reasonable to now add the Apple iPhone14 to this list.

It is limited to EMERGENCY transmissions only. Not a 2 way communicator with family/friends + an SOS. It does more than emergency locator beacons and does more than the SPOT Gen 4 one way communicator.

This may actually be more suitable for some than a stand alone communicator.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc
While T-Mobile & Starlink have announced a system that will work, at least with Android phones, that is not yet available at this point. As T-Mobile also offers Apple's iPhone14, which is already Satellite capable, one would think that there are also plans for connectivity through Starlink as well.

One problem I see with using a cell phone as a satellite emergency communicator is battery life. Cellphone battery life, at least when compared to dedicated Satellite Communicators, is very short. A cellphone cannot typically remain powered on for 24 hours, but most dedicated Satellite Communicators will remain powered on for multiple days, while sending out tracking information.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc
Garmin InReach is generally considered the best. It is tiny, it is incredibly rugged, it has good battery life, but it is pretty expensive. With the iPhone 14 and iPhone 15 there is now emergency satellite connection.

InReach uses the Iridium satellite network. Apple is using the Globalstar satellite network.

Here is a comparison of the 2 devices.

Clearly he has done some great tests, the Apple is the winner, by a long shot, for emergency communications SPEED. It should be noted that emergency communications are the only type that the Apple can send, so it is not useful for trip check in messaging and other sat-com messages. There is limited location sharing. The inReach is more rugged and has WORLDWIDE coverage, the iPhone has somewhat LIMITED coverage. The service is currently free for 2 years. It will be interesting to see what is added in the future and what they will charge for the service. iPhone is NOT suitable for serious backcountry use, but is probably viable for many people who are casual users of Sat-Com users. Realistically the iPhone realistically can probably replace 1/2 of the Sat-Com devices on the market.

 
I have a real problem with EVERY single one of "BEST" review articles, and I think I've honestly read every one that I can find. The problem is they don't dig into the actual costs of service plans. I've noted that problem before and am pointing it out again because the article below, which does a good job of describing the units, lists the "basic" monthly service fee for each of the companies and the reader is left to assume that the basic plans are the same, or essentially the same. The plans are not similar, the functionality is not similar.

The reviews also typically leave out the number of "pre-set" messages you are allowed to store on your device, each of which gives you unlimited use of those "pre-set" messages. In every case, you write your own "pre-set" messages, save them, and upload them to the device so they are stored on the device itself.

FOR EXAMPLE:
  • Zoleo gives you UNLIMITED use of 1 pre-set check in message
  • Garmin gives you UNLIMITED use of 1 pre-set check in message + 3 additional pre-set messages
  • SPOT X gives you UNLIMITED use of 1 pre-set check in message + 14 additional pre-set messages
I like to point this out because it is a major differential between communication functionality between all these plans.
  • With Zoleo your message will read something like "Checking in, all good" and it will include your coordinates
  • With Garmin you will have 4 of those messages so you can have the above "Checking in..." plus you can have "Weather great, travel is progressing as planned" plus you can have "Weather not cooperating, slow progress" plus you can have "Having some issues" or "Having a great time" or whatever.
  • With SPOT X you get 14 of those messages so you can have the same as Garmin plus, things like "Spending an extra day in this spot to explore" -AND- "having some issues with equipment, but I'm good, might be delayed" -AND- "found a Titty Bar and settling in" -AND- . . . for a total of 14 messages
Another major functional difference is Breadcrumb Tracking on a map with the "basic" plan.
  • With SPOT X you get unlimited tracking in the "basic" plan
  • With Garmin if you use tracking with the basic plan you are going to get charged 10-cents per ping. If you hike, ride, drive, for 6 hours a day, at 60-cents per hour, that is $3.60/day. Assume a 10 day trip and you just spent $36 additional dollars on breadcrumb tracking alone.
  • Zoleo charges a flat fee of $6/month for 'location sharing'
  • BivyStick uses a "credit" for every breadcrumb dropped, and those credits are deducted from your 20/credits per month fee, which are shared with communications. You can literally run out of credits at lunchtime on day 1 of your trip if you drop a breadcrumb every 10 minutes.
So while Garmin and SPOT both offer an $11.95 plan, the plans offer much different functionality. Zoleo's basic plan is more expensive out the door, but cheaper than Garmin's mid-level plan. BivyStick is $14.95 for the basic plan + $0.75 for each additional credit, which would put it as the most expensive if dropping a breadcrumb trail. If I was primarily using the unit for navigation then the best option is Garmin. Zoleo has a cheap up front cost but monthly cost will be roughly $26. BivyStick offers some group functionality the others don't.

My guess is that MOST casual users can easily get by with an $11.95/month plan while using a SPOT X, especially if you pay on an annual contract because all of your "monthly" messages are rolled over to the FIRST MONTH, so if you have a trip in month 3, 4 or 5 and just occasionally use it in the earlier or later months, you can splurge on the trip and never run out of "custom" messages, especially when combined with the UNLIMITED use of 14 "predefined messages" and the UNLIMITED 1 'check in message' and the UNLIMITED 'breadcrumb tracking' at 10 min intervals. If your travels are in the lower 48 or southern 1/2 of Canada, South or Central America, most of the European nations, and your focus is on tracking and communication then SPOT X is a compelling choice.

My guess is that MOST casual users with a Garmin InReach Messenger or InReach Mini2 will need the mid-level plan at $24.95/month on an annual contract, which is slightly more than DOUBLE the annual cost of the SPOT X plan. Now that said, if I had a boat that went off shore of either the East or West coasts, I'd grab the Garmin and pay the fee happily. If I was in the far NORTHERN Canada or Greenland, then the Garmin would also be the easy choice. If navigation was an important consideration then a Garmin would be an easy choice. Iridium's network is sometimes faster than the SPOT network and clearly has greater coverage, so that as a factor swings a choice to Garmin.
 
Now with the ABOVE post #7 in mind, here is another very good "BEST" article for you to consider


Article is long and well done, it details each device. ^^ FULL ARTICLE AT LINK ABOVE ^^ Follow the links in the article for their reviews of each device. But again, keep in mind that they quote "generic" monthly service fees without expanding on what you get for these devices in terms of service so re-read the post above.


The Best Satellite Messengers of 2024


Best Budget Satellite Messenger
The Best Satellite Messengers of 2024
Best Feature-Rich Messenger

The Best Satellite Messengers of 2024
Best On-Device Communicator

The Best Satellite Messengers of 2024
Best GPS Device Messenger

The Best Satellite Messengers of 2024
Best of the Rest

The Best Satellite Messengers of 2024

The Best Satellite Messengers of 2024

Satellite Messenger Comparison Chart

Satellite Messenger
Battery Life
Message Composition
Weight
Satellite System
Subscription Plan*
28 days
On-device options/in-app
4 oz.
Iridium
$11.95 /month
200 hours
In-app composition
5.3 oz.
Iridium
$20 /month
14 days
On-device options/in-app
3.5 oz.
Iridium
$11.95 /month
240 hours
On-device composition
7 oz.
Globalstar
$11.95 /month
425 hours
On-device options/in-app
8.1 oz.
Iridium
$11.95 /month
7 to 156 days
Pre-set messages only
5 oz.
Globalstar
$11.95 /month
120 hours
In-app composition
3.3 oz.
Iridium
$14.99 /month
96 hours
In-app composition
2.5 oz.
Inmarsat and Echostar
$5 /month
*Subscription plan amount given for annual ‘Basic’, ‘Essential’, or ‘Safety’ plansSatellite Messengers Round Up(Photo/Tim Newcomb)
 
Top