• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Democrat LGBTQ Diversity Council Chair Busted After Meeting Up With 14-Year-Old Decoy

Slant Eyed Polack

Slant Eyed Polack

Well-known member
Link: Maryland’s Democrat LGBTQ Diversity Council Chair Busted After Meeting Up With 14-Year-Old Decoy (VIDEO)

I honestly don't see the problem. All Michael Knaapen wanted was to sodomize a 14 year old boy. We have "graphic novels" like All Boys Aren't Blue in school libraries all over the country grooming kids for exactly that sort of fun & games. Everyone goes through rites of passage, after all. What's the big deal? It's not like the kid's going to get knocked up or anything. Plus, Knaapen rubs elbows with the most reliable and trusted people in America:

Why is the vice president (@VP/@KamalaHarris) hosting pedophile Michael Knaapen at her house? pic.twitter.com/fcDKY81H0N

Nothing to see here. Move along.
 
So shocked to see this :wink:

Literally stunned that, during a month dedicated to debauchery, a pedophile politician is outed :fart2:

At what point are we going to admit that as we move beyond recognizing that homosexuality may be natural for some and acceptable within much of society, but going off into the weeds of the other areas of the queer movement there are actually dangers to society.

Men dressed as women, reading and then demonstrating twerking to pre-schoolers, is somehow good for early childhood development?

Man-young boy love is never good, coaches and ministers have been charged with abuse for decades, but now the multi-colored-striped flag we enshrine as all that is good is pushing this sort of "attraction"!

There is so much wrong with these "all the above" allies joining together that it is hard to list them without turning angry.
 
I said it years ago regarding the acceptance of homosexuality, and specifically gay marriage. The main problem, aside from the religious and natural arguments, is that it is a slippery slope. We have to draw the line on sexual behavior somewhere, and hold that line. Once we start to give on it, which we have done, it becomes easier to cross the next line, and the next, and so on. That is what is happening.
 
Melensdad said:
This is idiocy explained by a leftist who is now confused…

Click to expand...

This is hilarious to me because some of the same leftists of a decade or two ago who pushed for greater "tolerance" of their lifestyle choices are now complaining that today's leftists go too far. Really? Conservatives were saying the same thing about you back then, and warning that this is where it would lead, and now they finally see it. The chickens have come home to roost.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top