It is almost over

[mak2]

Hi Mike, no I don't take it personally, it is just another stupid mindless personal attack. Exactly what I expect. Back to your porch.

Mak, please don't take this personally, but you remind me of the description I gave recently of al Sharpton: He reminds of the little dog that starts yapping in the front yard, stirs up all the big dogs, and then retreats quietly under the porch.
Mike

 

[road squawker]

... give me one person. Besides his grandparents, name one person of influence in Obama's life that was good ol' apple pie and Chevrolet American....

My vote goes to the transvestite that raised him in Indonesia

 

[Kane]

Alas, given all the time in the world to respond, mak2 STILL can't come up with a name of anyone of influence in Hussein's life that wasn't anti-American. Not one.

Yet mak2 voted for the man ... twice. That says a lot about mak2. Voted twice for Barack Hussein Obama. And given his stubbornness and/or inability to speak to the facts, there may be no hope in helping him see the light.

Tragic. Can't say we didn't try.

 

[ki0ho]

It just dawned on me.....there is a nurse at the va....that looks just like mak,s avatar!!!!! It dose sport a white dress though!!!!!! and I noticed the Docs seem to try to stay at a long arms length away from.....her?...It........

 

[tiredretired]

I have been there a couple of times but I don't think I have ever signed in. It is a pretty big forum with hundreds (or more) of posts per day right? How are you trying to compare that to FF?

Not trying to compare forums.

 

[Kane]

Not trying to compare forums.

Obviously mak2 knows you weren't trying to compare forums, TR, but since he wasn't prepared to respond to your REAL issue, he had to change the subject. It's the typical liberal debate101 tactic of DEFLECTION. If the subject is uncomfortable, change the subject. Deflect.

So don't hold yer breath waiting for mak2 to answer yer question.

 

[mak2]

So what was the point of trying to get me to go to DU to discuss the keystone pipeline?

Not trying to compare forums.

 

[mak2]

Every single one of your posts contain a personal attack. Generally on other forums this thread alone would earn you an infraction or get you banned. I do understand your problem though. You have picked up a few right wing sayings and meme's and really don't understand exactly what you are saying and often don't even understand the words you are using, but here, in FF you are around so many like minded or lock steppers you get away with it and they back you up. When anyone comes along with a slightly different viewpoint you realize how little you really know, and feel personally threatened because you really don't understand the issues, so you attack personally. Try not to think too much, it is uncomfortable sometimes.

Yeah, I read the Kos article, too, and suffered thru most of the 301 comments from the liberal disciples. Calling all of the republican "hoaxes" just matter of right wing hate sounds woefully similar to all of Obama's press secretaries referring to Obama's myriad problems a just a bunch of "phony scandals".

Well, mak2, this is just another one of your dirisive posts that is long on snark and short on facts. Typical mak2. If you don't mind, and if you have the courage, pick a "hoax" any "hoax" and let's debate it.

True to form, mak2 wanders by, throws a grenade ... and then leaves.

No, Barack Hussein Obama isn't the anti-Christ. But tell me, mak2, tell me about any one person of influence in Obama's life that wasn't a socialist, communist, anti-colonist, anti-imperialist, anti-Semite, Muslim sympathizer, black liberation theologist, domestic terrorist and just plain ol' anti-American social anarchist?

I've asked you before, but now that you've had a few years to think about it, give me one person. Besides his grandparents, name one person of influence in Obama's life that was good ol' apple pie and Chevrolet American.

You can't.

But you're right on one thing: In two years it will be over and we can finally air out the White House.

Don't fret about it, squerly. Explaining the same factual thing to liberals over and over and over again CAN be a bit pointless, and the interminable repetition CAN be a bit confounding.

And since we cannot convince liberals of the obvious by rational thinking, we are left to tedious ROTE as the sole method of pedagogy. Yes, it can be boring and subject to screwup if we're not careful. No harm; No foul.

But surely you wont let someone as misguidedly liberal as mak2 get to you. No dose of reason will ever make the man well, so don't blame yourself.

Typical liberal tactics when confronted with intellectual difficulty. Deflection. Straw men.

Wanna try again, mak2?

Unbelievable, mak2. WTF? Surely you can read. TiredRetired asked you politely to have a conversation with your liberal buddies on some other liberal site about the XL pipeline. And then report back.

You deflected away from the task by some BS gibberish concerning signing in. You created a straw man conversation concerning the size of other sites comparable to FF. You never did speak to the XL pipeline in any respect. Typical liberal debate tactics.

So yes, we'd like you to try again. Take a pro-XL position to another liberal site and tell us how the debate went. Simple enough?

Just more liberal deflection, mak2. Now stop deflecting like a liberal and focus on the task assigned by TiredRetired:

And then report back. Simple enough?

Alas, given all the time in the world to respond, mak2 STILL can't come up with a name of anyone of influence in Hussein's life that wasn't anti-American. Not one.

Yet mak2 voted for the man ... twice. That says a lot about mak2. Voted twice for Barack Hussein Obama. And given his stubbornness and/or inability to speak to the facts, there may be no hope in helping him see the light.

Tragic. Can't say we didn't try.

Obviously mak2 knows you weren't trying to compare forums, TR, but since he wasn't prepared to respond to your REAL issue, he had to change the subject. It's the typical liberal debate101 tactic of DEFLECTION. If the subject is uncomfortable, change the subject. Deflect.

So don't hold yer breath waiting for mak2 to answer yer question.

 

[Kane]

Every single one of your posts contain a personal attack. Generally on other forums this thread alone would earn you an infraction or get you banned. I do understand your problem though. You have picked up a few right wing sayings and meme's and really don't understand exactly what you are saying and often don't even understand the words you are using, but here, in FF you are around so many like minded or lock steppers you get away with it and they back you up. When anyone comes along with a slightly different viewpoint you realize how little you really know, and feel personally threatened because you really don't understand the issues, so you attack personally. Try not to think too much, it is uncomfortable sometimes.

Nuts, mak2.

You haven't responded directly to ANY issue. It's your thread, so just answer the questions without deflecting and obfuscating. Typical liberal debate tactic.

Simple.

 

[tiredretired]

Every single one of your posts contain a personal attack. Generally on other forums this thread alone would earn you an infraction or get you banned. I do understand your problem though. You have picked up a few right wing sayings and meme's and really don't understand exactly what you are saying and often don't even understand the words you are using, but here, in FF you are around so many like minded or lock steppers you get away with it and they back you up. When anyone comes along with a slightly different viewpoint you realize how little you really know, and feel personally threatened because you really don't understand the issues, so you attack personally. Try not to think too much, it is uncomfortable sometimes.

Personally, I see nothing that was said that would resemble a personal attack or warrant being banned on any forum that I have ever frequented. There was no name calling on any of those posts.

So, if there was some innuendo or you are implying that those in charge here are looking the other way, I would say that is a fallacy.

This is the political section of a diverse forum. There is a disclaimer that basically dictates that big boy pants are the uniform of the day. One must wear them with caution. If they are too tight and one's nuts get a little pinched, well then, oh darn.