• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Prince Andrew served papers, accused of sex assault in Epstein child trafficing/abuse scandal

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Looks like the Jeffery Epstein child trafficking, sexual abuse, child rape scandal is finally getting some high profile attention.

Glad to see this is back in the news, actually it is barely in the news as the mainstream media seems fairly intent on ignoring the whole story.

Somehow former President Clinton has not been named, nor have literally a hundred other high profile perverts. But the British royalty is apparently not beyond the reach of the US Courts.


This is an evolving and developing story, please check the link above at lawandcrime.com for updates!

Prince Served: Lawsuit Accusing Andrew of Sexually Abusing Jeffrey Epstein Victim Reaches Embattled Royal

Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre
Prince Andrew, the embattled Duke of York, has been successfully served with a lawsuit by a woman who claims he sexually assaulted her in three locations when she was 17 years old, court documents indicated on Friday.​
The prince’s alleged victim Virginia Giuffre announced the development in a court filing containing an affidavit by her process server Cesar Augusto Sepulveda, who wrote that he served the royal—whose full name is Andrew Albert Christian Edward—on Aug. 27 at 9:30 a.m.​
The Metropolitan Police Office and Head of Security at The Royal Lodge accepted service, according to the affidavit.​
The development comes just days before U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplanscheduled an initial pretrial conference for this coming Monday, Sept. 13.​
Giuffre, one of the most outspoken and prominent of now-deceased Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, claims that the prince sexually abused her in three locations: two properties of Epstein—a New York mansion and private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands—and one belonging to accused accused sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, her London home. Maxwell can be seen in the third locale in the background of a photograph showing the prince with his arm around Giuffre’s waist.​
The allegations first surfaced in Giuffre’s civil litigation some six years ago accusing Maxwell of turning her into a “sex slave” for the wealthy and powerful, including the British prince.​
Giuffre sued the prince under the New York Child Victims Act, and an exhibit to the affidavit shows a letter her attorney David Boies sent to the royal’s counsel preceding the filing of her lawsuit.​
“We have previously sought, so far without success, to meet with Prince Andrew or his counsel to receive Prince Andrew’s information and views, and to discuss whether a negotiated resolution might be appropriate,” Boies wrote on July 19. “We continue to be interested in such an approach.”​
At the time, Boies urged a quick response because the statute of limitations window was quickly closing under the statute that enabled her lawsuit, which was filed on Aug. 9.​
 

pirate_girl

legendary ⚓
GOLD Site Supporter
According to the Dailymail, his lawyers are claiming the papers were not properly served?
They're going to boycott the hearing (or try to).
?
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
She doesn't look upset about anything in that photo........
She was a minor in that photo which likely was taken before the rape occurred. 16 or 17 years old. Below the age of legal consent with an older adult.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
According to the Dailymail, his lawyers are claiming the papers were not properly served?
They're going to boycott the hearing (or try to).
?
They can try.

I've read that the papers were actually served 4 different ways, and the US court has accepted at least 2 of those as valid.
 
Top