• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Might be looking for a new car, possibly a hybrid?

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
I tend to look for months before I make a choice, so this could be a long journey.

162,000 miles on my Audi A6 diesel. Check Engine light is on because of an emissions filter that has gone bad. $3000 for that repair. But the car is exempt from emissions testing. And the issue is not really a problem. So I can run the car until it dies, and it might not die for years. Gets an honest 30+mpg in the city, 40+mpg on the highway. It was performance upgraded by custom Audi tuner "APR" and the ride is fast and comfortable. But its also a 2014 model. So getting a bit long in the tooth.

Looking around there seem to be lots of choices these days for hybrid vehicles that have similar luxury and performance and, if the nation goes into a recession over the next few months, dealerships may start to deal on cars again by the fall of the year.

So anyone have any recommendations on a nice size (Audi A6 size) hybrid sedan that can match the performance, luxury and mpg I current get but give me the convenience and technology features of a 2023 model year car?

A 5 passenger "2 row" SUV would also be in consideration, so just a mid-size SUV so it is easier to park in tight urban parking spots, nothing like a full size Tahoe, Suburban, Expedition, etc.
 

chowderman

Well-known member
had a 1990 100Quattro - ran the tires off it. finally it developed "electrical system issues" - plus tires, plus brakes, plus rotors, plus clutch . . .

loved the car, but the repair/maintenance cost were seriously more than its value. had I bought the 200Q (turbo),,, could have
sold it for 2x the original cost . . .

a plug-in hybrid with a 100 mile electric range would do the trick for me. regrets, they are not! there yet . . .
that would 'do' all my local driving on battery - and if replacing a lux / road trip vehicle , , , provide "infinite" painless range.
but the 30-50 mile electric range is nothing more than a very expensive ICE vehicle.
 
Last edited:

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Not looking at the "plug in hybrids"

Ranges on those are too short to be worthwhile for 95% of our drives. We live too far outside of town to pay the premium for 30-ish miles of battery storage. More looking toward the gas engine, electric assist traditional hybrids.
 

m1west

Well-known member
GOLD Site Supporter
Not looking at the "plug in hybrids"

Ranges on those are too short to be worthwhile for 95% of our drives. We live too far outside of town to pay the premium for 30-ish miles of battery storage. More looking toward the gas engine, electric assist traditional hybrids.
40mpg pretty hard to beat. do they still make them
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
40mpg pretty hard to beat. do they still make them
Diesel cars are no longer available here. And they are pretty amazing. Endless torque and quick too. I can embarrass a Mustang with a 5.0 engine in a race, not bad for a fairly large, heavy and luxurious sedan. But the diesel sips fuel. I’d buy another in a heartbeat if the US’s EPA would allow it!

Some of the larger hybrid sedans will get 40mpg. Performance with the electric boost is pretty close to my Audi. 2023 luxury beats 2014 luxury by most any metric.
 

bczoom

Super Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
A few thoughts.

Every one of the Audi's I've had felt "long in the tooth" once they crossed the 160,000 mile mark, regardless of how old they are.

It's a good idea to start shopping early. Many new models take almost a year if you order one.

For what you're looking for, I'd suggest you look at the offerings from Lexus. The reliability of a Toyota but better performance and luxury. We have a RX350 which is really nice and very good performance for a SUV. We have the gasser so it doesn't get much better fuel economy than my Silverado. They're new hybrid offerings have sedans and SUV's in the 40 MPG range.
 

Doc

Bottoms Up
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
When I was shopping I shied away from hybrids due to the cost of the replacement batteries. That was in 2016 and the battery for the 2013 Toyota Avalon I was considering in hybrid cost over $3000. I can't remember the expected life of the battery.
Hopefully life span of the batteries has grown and the price come down some. Maybe getting15 extra MPG in a hybrid would save you more than enough to pay for the replacement battery.
 

chowderman

Well-known member
be very very careful, and do your own math. the government method for hybrid mpg ignores most of reality, and personal usage patterns super-uber-ultra-drastically alter the economics. from my research/calculations, an extra 15 mpg (by government stds) ain't never gonna' cut it.

for me - retired - doing approx. 5,000 miles per year with 1/yr major 'road trip' + single digit local 'extended' range trips - the only possible way a hybrid can pay it's way is if all local usage is 100% electric (assuming only home charging.... charging at a very expensive "public" station blows the whole deal out of the water...) the typical 30-50 mile electric range does not allow that - and we're not like comma in the boonies.

basically, given a plug-in-hybrid that almost never runs out of juice for my "daily" usage - that could work. speed of charging is not an issue when you get home and park it for the night.... on a road trip, I'd likely not even consider 'charging speed' - fill up the tank and drive on!

. . . . not widely publicized, since Tesla has no PR group . . . but apparently the 'new super inexpensive' model uses newer battery / motor technology that will (if true) blow the game wide open.
multiple other companies are touting serious - like 200-300% - gains in energy storage density. so in the next couple years the electric vehicle scene may change rather dramatically.
of course, by then I'll be researching electric Zimmer frames . . .
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
be very very careful, and do your own math. the government method for hybrid mpg ignores most of reality, and personal usage patterns super-uber-ultra-drastically alter the economics. from my research/calculations, an extra 15 mpg (by government stds) ain't never gonna' cut it.…..
Enough actual owners are reporting better mpg than .gov mpg estimates to be believable
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Still looking.

Toyota seems to be the brand that has some of the very best hybrids. Lexus is the up-market label and many Toyota and Lexus vehicles use the same drive platforms. Reading lots of reviews. Toyota, Lexus seem to be at/near the top of most of the rankings. Hyundai also seems to be at/near the top of the rankings but none of their products seem to appeal to me, at least at this point.

Right now I'm thinking if I get a cross-over vehicle it might be the Toyota Venza. Its aimed at the buyers looking to stay on pavement and ride in comfort, upper trim levels offer the luxury I'm looking for and the price/performance seems to be reasonable. If I go with a sedan, likely be a Toyota Crown, the upper end trim shares a Lexus drivetrain. Mid-trim level, optioned with the technology package, shares the exact upper end luxury as the top Crown trim, but the same (milder) drive train as the Venza.

Toyota's Highlander is appealing but its a 3 row SUV and that is larger than what I'm looking for if we get an SUV/crossover. Same applies to the Volvo XC90. I owned an XC90 in the past, its a very nice vehicle, but just don't see the need for a 7 seat vehicle at this stage in my life. I don't see any value in the German brands right now, all seem over priced right now, perhaps that will change by the time I'm ready to buy? Audi's mid-size SUV has no rear seat legroom, I've used the dealer's loaner when my A6 has been in the shop, I want more comfort than it offers.

All the vehicle models I'm looking at seem to be aimed at empty nesters. None are hard core anything. Mild performance vehicles with more comfort and economy than flash or prestige.

Toyota Crown old man sedan:

2023-Toyota-Crown-Prices.jpg


Toyota Venza (old man's SUV)
2222-1536x864.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

bczoom

Super Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
A Highlander may be my next vehicle (It's my step-moms). Can't speak for the hybrid but the gasser is not good on fuel economy. Like the Lexus RX-350 we have, it struggles to get even 20MPG's.
She doesn't use the 3rd row seat. Even with that seat tucked away, storage is only nominal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

300 H and H

Bronze Member
GOLD Site Supporter
Global sales leader of ALL cars sales in the second quarter of this year is the Tesla Model 3. Base price in less than a Toyota Camery in most markets.
Plus, the coming self-driving feature is on all cars Tesla makes.
Just saying...
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Global sales leader of ALL cars sales in the second quarter of this year is the Tesla Model 3. Base price in less than a Toyota Camery in most markets.
Plus, the coming self-driving feature is on all cars Tesla makes.
Just saying...
It is not a practical car for our primary vehicle. As a secondary vehicle it would easily work. But not as a primary. Range issues. Plus interior is too small. Plus recharge time. Simply won't work as our primary.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
A Highlander may be my next vehicle (It's my step-moms). Can't speak for the hybrid but the gasser is not good on fuel economy. Like the Lexus RX-350 we have, it struggles to get even 20MPG's.
She doesn't use the 3rd row seat. Even with that seat tucked away, storage is only nominal.
Highlander is a top rated vehicle, and a top rated hybrid that gets lots of raves. But its the same basic size as the Volvo XC90 and we don't need the 3rd row seats. I've got the new 4 door/5 passenger near-luxury pick-up truck for hauling stuff. So the new vehicle doesn't need to have huge cargo capacity, but it does need very good rear seat room, moderate cargo area (at least a decent trunk), and be able to do long distance driving vacations as well as long distance single days. Plus get good fuel economy.

Audi has either gas (poor fuel economy) or all electric. VW is the same, either gas or electric. M-B has 'mild hybrids', gas and electric options but the mild hybrids pretty much suck in the ratings because they simply don't perform well. Never looked at the BMW offerings. Hyundai, and its sister company, Kia get high ratings for their hybrids, but not sure that those appeal to me. I won't buy a GM vehicle. Chrysler doesn't seem to have much to offer. I like the Lincoln SUVs, pretty much all of them, but their fuel economy on the middle sized (roomy 5 seater) Nautilus seems to be pretty abysmal. 2024 model year Lincoln Nautilus Hybrid is announced, and it could have roughly 35mpg in a totally revamped vehicle, which would be an attractive addition to my possible choices.

So for now, looks like the top picks might be a 2024 Nautilus Hybrid, a Toyota Crown or a Toyota Venza

One of the things about the Toyota Crown I like is the ride height, it is an elevated sedan, so the driver's seat is about the height of a typical crossover vehicle. I think it is a love-it or hate-it design. But the mid-level Crown with the technology package gets 41mpg and decent acceleration performance. The top trim level gets 30mpg and nicer acceleration but has the same interior as the mid-level variant if the technology package is selected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

Doc

Bottoms Up
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Interesting. I'd never heard of the Toyota Crown before. It looks nice for sure.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Interesting. I'd never heard of the Toyota Crown before. It looks nice for sure.
Crown has been their 'flagship' car for many decades but it has not been available in the USA for the past 25-ish years. Total redesign for 2023 and now available again in the US/Canadian markets. The Avalon was discontinued, the Crown is not really a direct replacement for the Avalon, but actually a slight upgrade over the Avalon.

If I decide on a sedan, it is currently the only model of any brand that looks interesting. Actually I like the Lincoln Continental sedan, but it is bigger than I want to buy. So the Crown looks like the best option.

For a SUV the things I am looking for are mild manners, good on pavement, luxury features, good economy and modest size. So no rock crawling and not a 7 passenger behemoth that will be a nightmare to park in a mini-size Chicago parking space. I want luxury seats for 4 people. I want to be able to do a driving vacation with 2 adults + a toddler, and enough room for luggage.

Lincoln's 2024 totally redefined Nautilus and Toyota's Venza both fit that bill very nicely. Lexus has a variant of the Venza that is a bit more upscale, but the Venza uses the SAME drivetrain and has plenty of luxury at the top of the range so I see no reason ot go to teh Lexus marque. Naitilus from Lincoln costs $10K more than the Venza, gets somewhat less economy, but offers enough more luxury that the tradeoffs might be worth the cost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Just a correction, I have 132,000 on my 2014 A6 diesel and 164,000 on my 2010 VW Jetta diesel.

If I buy a new hybrid, I give up a lot of performance by getting rid of the Audi A6 and probably only pick up 4-6mpg in the trade off. So the real advantage is that I get a lot of convenience features that I can live without, like Apple CarPlay. The A6 "needs" a $3500 emissions part to comply with the federal EPA standards but Indiana waives the diesel standards on cars so the only thing i have is an idiot light on my dashboard saying that the part is bad and needs to be replaced. The interior is covered in baby cereal as Kobe throws food, but is otherwise just in need of a clean up on the A6.

The VW "needs" the same part as the Audi to turn off the idiot light, price is probably closer to $4000 to replace that one. Car is worth $3000? The fiberglass racing front end is cracked, $1800/$2000 to repair that. Interior is pristine. Literally perfect. Drove it across the county and back this morning from rural to urban and back again, trip average was right at 46mpg. And it's a fun little zippy car to drive.

The more I think about all this the more I think I should dump about $10,000 to $15K into my existing cars. They run great. Engines have been well maintained. My diesel mechanic says they each could easily get another 100,000 miles each. So maybe I am just distracted by shiny new things and envy the flashy newer cars?

If I fix the issues (cosmetic + mechanical) I have with the 2 I currently have sitting here I'd still save $40,000 versus buying a new car. At this point I am leaning that direction, but I do like the Toyota Crown and the Toyota Venza.
 

m1west

Well-known member
GOLD Site Supporter
Just a correction, I have 132,000 on my 2014 A6 diesel and 164,000 on my 2010 VW Jetta diesel.

If I buy a new hybrid, I give up a lot of performance by getting rid of the Audi A6 and probably only pick up 4-6mpg in the trade off. So the real advantage is that I get a lot of convenience features that I can live without, like Apple CarPlay. The A6 "needs" a $3500 emissions part to comply with the federal EPA standards but Indiana waives the diesel standards on cars so the only thing i have is an idiot light on my dashboard saying that the part is bad and needs to be replaced. The interior is covered in baby cereal as Kobe throws food, but is otherwise just in need of a clean up on the A6.

The VW "needs" the same part as the Audi to turn off the idiot light, price is probably closer to $4000 to replace that one. Car is worth $3000? The fiberglass racing front end is cracked, $1800/$2000 to repair that. Interior is pristine. Literally perfect. Drove it across the county and back this morning from rural to urban and back again, trip average was right at 46mpg. And it's a fun little zippy car to drive.

The more I think about all this the more I think I should dump about $10,000 to $15K into my existing cars. They run great. Engines have been well maintained. My diesel mechanic says they each could easily get another 100,000 miles each. So maybe I am just distracted by shiny new things and envy the flashy newer cars?

If I fix the issues (cosmetic + mechanical) I have with the 2 I currently have sitting here I'd still save $40,000 versus buying a new car. At this point I am leaning that direction, but I do like the Toyota Crown and the Toyota Venza.
Putting a few bucks in your existing vehicles that get 40 mpg and will go another 100k would be a good move.
 

chowderman

Well-known member
it's very often not the miles which becomes and issue - but rather "old age."
stuff like power(whatever), electrical (whatever) die - and German cars are famous for mystery electrical problems. everything is done by relay (it's a German engineering "DIN standard" - no direct power on control 'buttons/knobs' . . . )

the 1980 Audi 100Q went ~270k miles (the odometer/speedometer was non function for 3-4 years . . . did I mention electrical issues?) - no leaks, good compression, 26 mpg,,, but then the whole sequence of relays cascaded into failure. the mechanic said he'd never seen so many error codes . . . stick shift, loved that car/handling/comfort - but it got donated to charity - as virtually no one would make an offer with all the blown up electrics....

a MB 240 went 15 years - everything was still working so I traded that in while it still 'had value.' the 'high end' cars are so expensive to repair, letting it go 'early' was a 'smaller loss' that a 'total loss' when this-that-t'other thing blew up....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Or just pull the bulbs. Why fix something that isn't really affecting anything?
I use a code reader and reset them, which shuts off the lights, sometimes for a day, sometimes a few, other times for just a few minutes. I want to leave the lights just to remind me to use a code reader to make sure there is not SOMETHING ELSE that is also wrong. As long as I get the error codes related to the diesel particulate filter and nothing else then I'm OK with them on.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Looking at some news, maybe it would be good to hold off and wait for some new technology to be embedded into the design and function of cars? I'd love 932 mile range. Best I can do is about 745 in my Audi, I know it does that because I've driven from my home to Raleigh NC on 1 tank (multiple times) but it puts me in town running on 'E'

There is more to the article than what I quote below.



The next iteration in the world of electric vehicles is getting closer...at least, if Toyota's claims are accurate.
The legacy automaker is now claiming it has "found a technological breakthrough that will allow it to bring solid state batteries to market as early as 2027," according to PC Mag.
Chief Technology Officer Hiroki Nakajima said this week: "We found quality material. We'll keep up with the rest of the world and definitely put it to practical use."
As Samsung notes, a solid state battery "has higher energy density than a Li-ion battery that uses liquid electrolyte solution. It doesn’t have a risk of explosion or fire, so there is no need to have components for safety, thus saving more space. Then we have more space to put more active materials which increase battery capacity in the battery." . . .​
 

chowderman

Well-known member
the "solid state" batteries have shown some interesting promise - the researchers have not released any info (I could find) on longevity / aging, or power loss in the cold, etc, etc. living in a temperate climate, range on an EV at single F' digits is like - dude - serious business!

a plug in hybrid with 100 miles elect range would work for me.

curiously today I see our supermarket is installing 'reserved' spaces for EV charging . . . from the concrete pads poured (for mounting the hardware, one presumes . . . ) it's like four charging stations in a parking lot of 500. that's gonna' work out so well . . . driving thru the lot I see 10 - 20 Tesla's every trip . . .

while the government is only going to bless funds for dual-mode charging stations, the idiots are ignoring a much bigger problem.
all these charging systems will have fees based on whether you are a 'club member' - the demand must be a nation wide "club" - every charging system recognizes / honors every other 'club' and charges the lower club rate anywhere.

going with the 'we can charge you as much as we want' will have EV types begging for $10/gal gas again.
btw, did a search - over 2,700 used Teslas available within 100 miles....I've heard some significant % of EV owners have had the shine wear off . .
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
As of now, I have no desire to get a EV, but the hybrids seem pretty solid. I'd still prefer diesel. But diesel cars no longer are sold in the USA. So EV looks like the best bet for economy.

Still liking the Toyota Venza and Toyota Crown sedan. The Lexus (fancy division from Toyota) ES300h is an option too. The ES and the Crown are both about the same size as my current Audi A6. Both offer roughly 40mpg. The Lexus ES300h is a traditional sedan and lots of luxury, just a few thousand more than the Toyota Crown. The Crown is a raised sedan, meaning the car sits a few inches taller than a normal sedan, similar to a 'crossover' type SUV. The Venza is an old man's hybrid SUV, dressed up for road use with luxury trim, but never should it drive off road, and also in the 40mpg range. Venza is just under $50k all dressed up, including sales tax. Toyota Crown is a few grand more. Lexus ES300h is a couple grand more than the Crown. So roughly a $10k spread between the 3 cars and from what I can see, all three are viable choices for my needs.

All that said, maybe the best solution is to have my mechanic go over my 2 diesel cars and put off any decision for 2 to 4 more years.
 

tiredretired

The Old Salt
SUPER Site Supporter
Hybrids are the way to go. I would have ordered a hybrid in my Mav BUT it is not available with AWD so that was the deal breaker right there for me. Oddly, hybrids are cheaper than the 2.0 EcoBoost in the Mav.

I find PHEV to be very intriguing. We have friends that drive their PHEV Rav4 mostly locally and a tank of gas lasts about 3-4 months. LOL. They elected not to invest in a charger saying that it charges just fine overnight from an extension cord. To me it is the best of both worlds. An electric vehicle without range anxiety.

BTW, I cast my vote for the Lexus ES300h from you list. That is one nice car. Too nice for us up here north of the woodchucks.
 
Last edited:

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Hyundai Santa Fe has been added to the list. AWD, Hybrid, 5 passenger SUV. Roomier and nicer features/interior than the Toyota Venza. Venza beats the Santa Fe on fuel economy by a few mpg, but not deal killer difference. If I go for an SUV instead of a sedan it will likely be a 2-row/5 passenger mid-size (I don't want a vehicle longer than the current Audi A6). The Santa Fe fits the description well and is reported to be coming out with a complete re-design this fall. So 2023 models will likely be discounted, and they are nice. But if the newly designed 2024 model is appealing it offers another choice, but also is rumored to be running the same hybrid engine as the 23, which is considered reliable. Either would likely be nicer than the Venza.

The Toyota Crown is still very interesting and at/near the top of my desirability list. Higher than the Lexus ES300h for one main reason, the Crown is a raised sedan, so it sits a little higher off the ground. That is appealing to me.

Still very undecided. Still thinking that tossing 5 grand at the current car will buy me another 5 year life out of my Audi. And the turbo diesel powered A6 is fast as heck, in addition to being economical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

jpr62902

Jeanclaude Spam Banhammer
SUPER Site Supporter
Not directly relevant since it's not a hybrid, but I bought an ES 350 in October and I love it. The ride is quiet and comfy without sacrificing too much handling ability. The tech in this thing is pretty good, too - I'm definitely an Android auto convert. Price wasn't bad either, even when dealers were typically tacking on extra thousands to MSRP due to supply issues. I'm averaging about 25 MPG in mixed driving, mostly short distances (> 20 miles). I got 36 MPG the last time I did a highway trip.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
this (conservative) think tank is not impressed with the move to EVs:
very little sky screaming, lots of data . . .
I just don't see the electric cars as viable for me for now.

Perhaps in the future, as solid state batteries are deployed and charging times drop into the 10 minute range. But not now, not at the price premium, not a the inconvenience level.

Toyota seems to make a lot of sense with their hybrid logic. High levels of fuel economy, low entry cost barrier, the masses can save fuel affordably. Get LOTS of hybrids on the road and the overall fuel consumption drops without being a drain on the electric grid. Battery cars are for the elite class that doesn't drive far and is willing to pay big bucks to virtue signal their social responsibility.
 
Top