• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Fire and Fury; To whom did the Author actually Talk?

FrancSevin

Proudly Deplorable
GOLD Site Supporter
Mike Wolff claims to have interviewed White house staffers and gotten the skinny on how bad it is to be in the West Wing the First Trump Term. But he didn't interview on cabinet member, the P or the Prez, so on who's fiction did he base the expose'?
Here he admits he didn't interview anyone who is high on the staff.
http://www.971talk.com/blogs/allmans-electric-stove/aitm-videos/who-did-michael-wolff-actually-talk


Listen where he admits to real interviews that he didn't talk to people in the know.

Whilst that possibly makes his tell all book little more than a collection of opinions and fiction, it doesn't get Bannon off the hook. That man is toast..
 

tiredretired

The Old Salt
SUPER Site Supporter
Even Jake Tapper, of the Fake News Network, admits there sure seems to be a lot of sloppy errors in the Wolff book.

My God, why does this rag even get the time of day other then it fits the current narrative of the left that Trump is mentally unfit for office. Having failed on all other fronts to bring this President down, this is their latest ploy. Even this will fail.

The bipartisan meeting today proves my point. Does anyone remember when Obama bin Biden held such a meeting and seemed so flexible in the negotiation process. No, because it never happened. The Donald gets things done and most assuredly has all his marbles. And then some.

As for Bannon, he's a traitorous asshole to the MAGA cause.He should insure he is sober before he engages that mouth of his. Andrew Breitbart must be rolling in his grave.
 

mla2ofus

Well-known member
GOLD Site Supporter
I think Bannon was trying get in line for 2020 but stepped on his dick and fell on his face!!
Mike
 

EastTexFrank

Well-known member
GOLD Site Supporter
it doesn't get Bannon off the hook. That man is toast..

Yes he is. He has been removed from Breitbart. All his sponsors are pulling back, 'way back from him. Soon he will be standing alone if he isn't already. He's toxic. You don't do what he did to the President and his family and walk away unscathed. If he'd done such a thing to Hillary he'd be on a hit list already.
 

FrancSevin

Proudly Deplorable
GOLD Site Supporter
Mike Wolff claims to have interviewed White house staffers and gotten the skinny on how bad it is to be in the West Wing the First Trump Term. But he didn't interview on cabinet member, the P or the Prez, so on who's fiction did he base the expose'?
Here he admits he didn't interview anyone who is high on the staff.
http://www.971talk.com/blogs/allmans-electric-stove/aitm-videos/who-did-michael-wolff-actually-talk


Listen where he admits to real interviews that he didn't talk to people in the know.

Whilst that possibly makes his tell all book little more than a collection of opinions and fiction, it doesn't get Bannon off the hook. That man is toast..
That bi-partisan meeting was televised today, not as a PR stunt , but as part of the openness this President promised. We got to se our representative as they worked for us, the American people.
Although I am often offended by what he says and how he says it, I love Trumps habit of tweets. No one can claim the President is hiding how he feels about anything. Easily the most "transparent" administration of our lifetime.

And yet, the Never Trumpsters continue to claim there is a hidden evil plan.
 

rugerman

New member
Trump might upset some folks with his straight talk, but you don’t have to guess the meaning of what he says, unlike obama who always had a hidden agenda and always spoke in generalities or had some hidden meaning to what he said or he just down right lied, according to what suited his purpose at the time.
 
Top