• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Obama said we can't drill our way to energy independence. Actually, we did.

Jim_S

Gone But Not Forgotten
GOLD Site Supporter
February 15, 2018
Obama said we can't drill our way to energy independence. Actually, we did.
By Gregory Winkeleer

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...y_to_energy_independence_actually_we_did.html

Believe it or not, there was a time when a seemingly large, definitely vocal group of US political leaders told us that we must reduce America’s dependence on fossil fuels – particularly, oil. “We are running out of oil”, they said. “We can’t compete with OPEC”, they insisted to us. And of course, the most famous warning they gave us: “We can’t drill our way out of this”.

This came mostly from Democrats. In 2012, no less an authority than Barack Obama told us that calling for increased production by increased drilling - “drill baby drill,” he called it - was not a plan, but rather “a bumper sticker”. Mr. Obama assured us “you know we can't just drill our way to lower gas prices", as if everyone who disagreed with him was simply refusing to admit that, deep down, they were wrong and he was right.

But what went widely unreported during the Obama years was that advances in the two technologies that are most responsible for increased drilling efficiency - Industrial Fracturing (aka fracking) and Horizontal Drilling – were creating a revolution in the US Energy industry. Production became much more efficient, even though Mr. Obama opposed these technologies. He later tried to take credit for the results – while conveniently leaving out the fact that due to his administration’s extreme reluctance to permit drilling on Federal land, all of the increase in production came from private/state owned land. And, in case you were wondering, the same goes for natural gas. How reluctant was Mr. Obama to permit drilling on Federal land? On average, the number of leases granted by the Bureau of Land Management to drill for oil on Federal land under Mr. Obama was far lower than any of the 4 presidential administrations prior to his.

Yet in spite of the restrictive energy policies of the Obama administration, by 2015 the US was the top producer of natural gas (most of the energy released by fracking is in the form of natural gas) in the world, producing about 20% more than runner up Russia.

Fast forward to 2016 - Donald Trump is elected President with a very different energy policy in mind than that of Mr. Obama. He wants to increase production, by repealing Obama’s fracking rules. He also wants to make more Federal land available for drilling – he even included opening up ANWAR to drilling for the first time ever, as part of the Tax Reform bill he signed into law in December 2017.

As a result of Mr. Trumps policies, the US is about to overtake Saudi Arabia and Russia to become the world’s top oil producer by 2019. Even the once-mighty OPEC has been left in the rear view mirror.

What’s next? Probably the next bottleneck: Refineries. As of January, 2017, there are 141 petroleum refineries operating in the United States. Believe it or not, all but 11 of them were opened more than 40 years ago. I would expect to see Mr. Trump to reform the permitting process for building refineries in the same way he has reformed processes related to fracking.

Regardless of what Mr. Trump does for an encore, we now know that Mr. Obama and his fellow Democrats were wrong: We not only can drill our way to energy independence, but we did.
 

tiredretired

The Old Salt
SUPER Site Supporter
February 15, 2018
Obama said we can't drill our way to energy independence. Actually, we did.
By Gregory Winkeleer

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...y_to_energy_independence_actually_we_did.html

Believe it or not, there was a time when a seemingly large, definitely vocal group of US political leaders told us that we must reduce America’s dependence on fossil fuels – particularly, oil. “We are running out of oil”, they said. “We can’t compete with OPEC”, they insisted to us. And of course, the most famous warning they gave us: “We can’t drill our way out of this”.

This came mostly from Democrats. In 2012, no less an authority than Barack Obama told us that calling for increased production by increased drilling - “drill baby drill,” he called it - was not a plan, but rather “a bumper sticker”. Mr. Obama assured us “you know we can't just drill our way to lower gas prices", as if everyone who disagreed with him was simply refusing to admit that, deep down, they were wrong and he was right.

But what went widely unreported during the Obama years was that advances in the two technologies that are most responsible for increased drilling efficiency - Industrial Fracturing (aka fracking) and Horizontal Drilling – were creating a revolution in the US Energy industry. Production became much more efficient, even though Mr. Obama opposed these technologies. He later tried to take credit for the results – while conveniently leaving out the fact that due to his administration’s extreme reluctance to permit drilling on Federal land, all of the increase in production came from private/state owned land. And, in case you were wondering, the same goes for natural gas. How reluctant was Mr. Obama to permit drilling on Federal land? On average, the number of leases granted by the Bureau of Land Management to drill for oil on Federal land under Mr. Obama was far lower than any of the 4 presidential administrations prior to his.

Yet in spite of the restrictive energy policies of the Obama administration, by 2015 the US was the top producer of natural gas (most of the energy released by fracking is in the form of natural gas) in the world, producing about 20% more than runner up Russia.

Fast forward to 2016 - Donald Trump is elected President with a very different energy policy in mind than that of Mr. Obama. He wants to increase production, by repealing Obama’s fracking rules. He also wants to make more Federal land available for drilling – he even included opening up ANWAR to drilling for the first time ever, as part of the Tax Reform bill he signed into law in December 2017.

As a result of Mr. Trumps policies, the US is about to overtake Saudi Arabia and Russia to become the world’s top oil producer by 2019. Even the once-mighty OPEC has been left in the rear view mirror.

What’s next? Probably the next bottleneck: Refineries. As of January, 2017, there are 141 petroleum refineries operating in the United States. Believe it or not, all but 11 of them were opened more than 40 years ago. I would expect to see Mr. Trump to reform the permitting process for building refineries in the same way he has reformed processes related to fracking.

Regardless of what Mr. Trump does for an encore, we now know that Mr. Obama and his fellow Democrats were wrong: We not only can drill our way to energy independence, but we did.

Just goes to show you just how little that phony dictator knows about business. Listening to how the media gushes over him and his old lady one would think he is the greatest thing since Apple Pie.

Things like this just show the rest of us what a lying damn fool he was and is.

We need to be building natural gas power plants as well. It is becoming obvious now that nuclear just cannot compete with the cheap and readily available supplies of natural gas.
 

FrancSevin

Proudly Deplorable
GOLD Site Supporter
Wouldn't it be great if we could power our cars and economy with Liberal Progressive hyperbole!!!!! We'd all be warm, cozy and rich whilst the Arab world would have to go back to living in tents.
 

tiredretired

The Old Salt
SUPER Site Supporter
Wouldn't it be great if we could power our cars and economy with Liberal Progressive hyperbole!!!!! We'd all be warm, cozy and rich whilst the Arab world would have to go back to living in tents.

:yum:Yeah, true story, but back on a serious note I wonder what ever happened to pushing for more natural gas fueled automobiles. The infrastructure is here, natural gas is relatively cheap and plentiful.
 

Jim_S

Gone But Not Forgotten
GOLD Site Supporter
natural gas is relatively cheap and plentiful.

Another advantage is natural gas isn’t a fossil fuel :yum:


[ame="http://youtube.com/watch?v=8At2Lch-m5c"]Pelosi: Natural Gas an "Alternative to Fossil Fuels" - YouTube[/ame]
 

S-noWonder

New member
What I never understood was why there was a problem drilling our own oil. They said it was bad for the environment, but isn't it just as bad in other countries. So I guess it is okay to destroy environments in other countries, just not ours. It's not like we share the same earth or anything. Sorry off topic, but that always bugged me.
 

rugerman

New member
Once again obama has shown his ignorance of the laws of supply and demand. So far just about everything that he touched was a screw up.
 

waybomb

Well-known member
GOLD Site Supporter
Yesterday they filling a 2 million barrel ship in Louisiana full of oil sending/selling it to somebody.
We not only have enough, we are now an exporter,
 

jimbo

Bronze Member
GOLD Site Supporter
What I never understood was why there was a problem drilling our own oil. They said it was bad for the environment, but isn't it just as bad in other countries. So I guess it is okay to destroy environments in other countries, just not ours. It's not like we share the same earth or anything. Sorry off topic, but that always bugged me.

You can add to that the fact that most oil disasters are not due to drilling but rather to transporting. Ships sink and leak? Trucks get in wrecks and empty their contents. Trains derail. The closer to home, the less the problem.
 
Top