Forums Forums - Off Topic Forum FUN




Go Back   Forums Forums - Off Topic Forum FUN > Debate Forums > Religious Debate Forum

Religious Debate Forum Warning: The posts/threads contained in this section of the forum can get heated.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-28-2018, 08:26 AM
pirate_girl's Avatar
pirate_girl pirate_girl is offline
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 43,043
Thanks: 7,910
Thanked 16,849 Times in 6,456 Posts
pirate_girl is on a distinguished road
Default Re: WALSH: There Must Be A Purge In The Catholic Church. And It Must Be Brutal.

http://conservativefighters.com/news...d-must-resign/

A former high ranking official in the Catholic Church, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, claims that Pope Francis personally helped cover up the abuses of degenerate predator Cardinal McCarrick. Vigano spilled his guts in an 11-page report, which he says he is publishing now in order to “discharge his conscience” so that he can “present himself to God with a clean conscience.” What follows from there is tantamount to a nuclear bomb dropped right on top of the whole network of cowards and perverts in the upper echelons of the Church.

Vigano spends the first half of his report accusing numerous cardinals and bishops by name. He reserves special (and deserved) scorn for Cardinal Wuerl, who covered up abuses in Pittsburg, saying Wuerl “lies shamelessly.” He names a host of other top officials, indicting them as liars, conspirators, and deviants or defenders of deviants. Finally, he lands on Pope Francis himself.

He claims that Francis knew about McCarrick’s abuses but took no action against him, and actually lifted sanctions that Pope Benedict had placed on him. Vigano says that he personally spoke with Francis about McCarrick, yet Francis still kept McCarrick installed as a public and powerful voice in the Church. In Vigano’s version, Francis only moved against McCarrick once his misdeeds became public knowledge. Vigano called for Francis to “set a good example” and resign from his office.

In the couple of days since these stunning allegations were made, one person mentioned in Vigano’s letter has come forward and corroborated his claims. Also, the National Catholic Register confirmed that Benedict did know about McCarrick and did level sanctions against him. Further, Cardinal Burke and a bishop in Texas have categorized the allegations as credible and called for a thorough investigation.

For his part, incredibly, Pope Francis chose not to respond to the allegations at all. In a deranged statement, he declared that he is “not going to say a word about this.” He actually admonished the public to “draw conclusions” and “make your own judgment.”

A few points about all of this:

1) There are no flattering ways to interpret Pope Francis’ non-denial. Either he is guilty as sin or he has so much disdain and hubris in his heart that he does not think he owes anyone an explanation. I suppose a third possibility is that the man has gone completely senile. But until Vatican doctors testify to the latter option, we are left choosing between the first two or both combined.

Whichever is true, Francis’ answer is shameful. Catholic faithful around the world had already been deeply distressed and heartbroken as they watched their beloved Church gasping and staggering under the weight of cowardice, debauchery, and corruption. Now that the Pope has been implicated, many Catholics have found themselves teetering on the edge of despair. In the face of such scandal and pain, Francis has nothing to offer but smugness. It is disgraceful.


The pontiff has no problem pontificating about “rigid” young Catholics who are too orthodox for his taste. He has no problem mocking Catholics who take seriously the Church’s teachings about birth control, accusing them of breeding “like rabbits.” He even has no problem upending millennia of Church teaching and the dictates of God Himself when it comes to issues like the death penalty. But suddenly he becomes shy when he is asked a simple question about his own conduct?

Well, we must note that Francis’ silence is not unprecedented. When four cardinals sent him a letter expressing “grave concern” over his teachings in Amoris Laetitia, asking him to answer five simple questions in order to clear up the confusion created by the document, Francis ignored them. To this day, he has not answered the questions. This is Francis’ long-established modus operandi: wreak havoc and sow confusion, then arrogantly refuse to clarify anything.

2) If the allegations are true, Pope Francis must resign. He would lack the moral capacity to lead even a local parish in North Dakota, let alone the entire Church. If he will not resign, then he must be pushed out. The message would need to be sent from every good Bishop, every good priest, and every good Catholic lay person, that they will not tolerate such abuses from anyone — even the Pope. Especially the Pope.

3) But that raises the central question: are the allegations true? They are certainly credible, as they come from a reliable and knowledgeable source and are well-detailed and documented. They have been corroborated by at least one witness and aspects of the story have apparently been confirmed by Benedict. Many of the people implicated are known cowards and liars, so Vigano would seem to have the edge in a “he said/they said” debate. Vigano’s story also sounds reasonable and fits into the overall puzzle. These factors do not remove all doubt, but they do remove a significant portion of the doubt.

In order to fully confirm Vigano’s claims, or fully refute them, the following needs to happen: 1) All of the documents, letters, and memos Vigano mentions in his report, which he says will corroborate many of his claims, must be released to the public. 2) Every person in the Vatican hierarchy with any knowledge of the situation must come forward and speak. 3) A full investigation must be conducted. 4) Pope Francis must answer these charges personally, not through statements issued by Vatican lawyers.

If none of these measures are taken, Catholic faithful will have no choice but to assume that the cover-up is ongoing and Francis is involved in it. He will have left them no other option. Pope Francis can no longer be given the benefit of the doubt. If he allows the doubt to fester, then the benefit will go to Vigano. The time for blind acceptance is over. The men at the very top of the hierarchy must be humbled. They must explain themselves. They are not gods. They are servants of God. Now it is time for them to act like it.

Pope Francis once exhorted Christians to “answer for themselves.” Now I exhort him to do the same. And there is no time to waste.
__________________
Mother Superior Nana Patriot Nurse
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pirate_girl For This Useful Post:
Doc  (08-29-2018), jim slagle  (08-28-2018)
  #22  
Old 08-28-2018, 09:38 PM
jim slagle's Avatar
jim slagle jim slagle is offline
Cold Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,180
Thanks: 24,551
Thanked 12,057 Times in 5,630 Posts
jim slagle is on a distinguished road
Default Re: WALSH: There Must Be A Purge In The Catholic Church. And It Must Be Brutal.

......
Attached Images
  
__________________
.

The United States Constitution ©1787. All Rights Reserved

Sometimes I'm fast. Most of the time I'm half fast!

Never put off till tomorrow what you can avoid all together!

Friends come and go, but enemies accumulate

FF REQUIRES NO PHYSICAL FITNESS PROGRAM.
EVERYONE GETS ENOUGH EXERCISE JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, FLYING
OFF THE HANDLE, RUNNING DOWN THE MODERATORS, KNIFING FRIENDS IN THE
BACK, DODGING RESPONSIBILITY AND PUSHING THEIR LUCK.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jim slagle For This Useful Post:
Doc  (08-29-2018), Melensdad  (08-28-2018), pirate_girl (08-28-2018)
  #23  
Old 08-29-2018, 08:13 AM
Doc's Avatar
Doc Doc is offline
Forum Admin

 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 33,261
Thanks: 18,527
Thanked 14,321 Times in 5,668 Posts
Doc will become famous soon enoughDoc will become famous soon enough
Default Re: WALSH: There Must Be A Purge In The Catholic Church. And It Must Be Brutal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pirate_girl View Post
http://conservativefighters.com/news...d-must-resign/

A former high ranking official in the Catholic Church, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, claims that Pope Francis personally helped cover up the abuses of degenerate predator Cardinal McCarrick. Vigano spilled his guts in an 11-page report, which he says he is publishing now in order to “discharge his conscience” so that he can “present himself to God with a clean conscience.” What follows from there is tantamount to a nuclear bomb dropped right on top of the whole network of cowards and perverts in the upper echelons of the Church.

Vigano spends the first half of his report accusing numerous cardinals and bishops by name. He reserves special (and deserved) scorn for Cardinal Wuerl, who covered up abuses in Pittsburg, saying Wuerl “lies shamelessly.” He names a host of other top officials, indicting them as liars, conspirators, and deviants or defenders of deviants. Finally, he lands on Pope Francis himself.

He claims that Francis knew about McCarrick’s abuses but took no action against him, and actually lifted sanctions that Pope Benedict had placed on him. Vigano says that he personally spoke with Francis about McCarrick, yet Francis still kept McCarrick installed as a public and powerful voice in the Church. In Vigano’s version, Francis only moved against McCarrick once his misdeeds became public knowledge. Vigano called for Francis to “set a good example” and resign from his office.

In the couple of days since these stunning allegations were made, one person mentioned in Vigano’s letter has come forward and corroborated his claims. Also, the National Catholic Register confirmed that Benedict did know about McCarrick and did level sanctions against him. Further, Cardinal Burke and a bishop in Texas have categorized the allegations as credible and called for a thorough investigation.

For his part, incredibly, Pope Francis chose not to respond to the allegations at all. In a deranged statement, he declared that he is “not going to say a word about this.” He actually admonished the public to “draw conclusions” and “make your own judgment.”

A few points about all of this:

1) There are no flattering ways to interpret Pope Francis’ non-denial. Either he is guilty as sin or he has so much disdain and hubris in his heart that he does not think he owes anyone an explanation. I suppose a third possibility is that the man has gone completely senile. But until Vatican doctors testify to the latter option, we are left choosing between the first two or both combined.

Whichever is true, Francis’ answer is shameful. Catholic faithful around the world had already been deeply distressed and heartbroken as they watched their beloved Church gasping and staggering under the weight of cowardice, debauchery, and corruption. Now that the Pope has been implicated, many Catholics have found themselves teetering on the edge of despair. In the face of such scandal and pain, Francis has nothing to offer but smugness. It is disgraceful.


The pontiff has no problem pontificating about “rigid” young Catholics who are too orthodox for his taste. He has no problem mocking Catholics who take seriously the Church’s teachings about birth control, accusing them of breeding “like rabbits.” He even has no problem upending millennia of Church teaching and the dictates of God Himself when it comes to issues like the death penalty. But suddenly he becomes shy when he is asked a simple question about his own conduct?

Well, we must note that Francis’ silence is not unprecedented. When four cardinals sent him a letter expressing “grave concern” over his teachings in Amoris Laetitia, asking him to answer five simple questions in order to clear up the confusion created by the document, Francis ignored them. To this day, he has not answered the questions. This is Francis’ long-established modus operandi: wreak havoc and sow confusion, then arrogantly refuse to clarify anything.

2) If the allegations are true, Pope Francis must resign. He would lack the moral capacity to lead even a local parish in North Dakota, let alone the entire Church. If he will not resign, then he must be pushed out. The message would need to be sent from every good Bishop, every good priest, and every good Catholic lay person, that they will not tolerate such abuses from anyone — even the Pope. Especially the Pope.

3) But that raises the central question: are the allegations true? They are certainly credible, as they come from a reliable and knowledgeable source and are well-detailed and documented. They have been corroborated by at least one witness and aspects of the story have apparently been confirmed by Benedict. Many of the people implicated are known cowards and liars, so Vigano would seem to have the edge in a “he said/they said” debate. Vigano’s story also sounds reasonable and fits into the overall puzzle. These factors do not remove all doubt, but they do remove a significant portion of the doubt.

In order to fully confirm Vigano’s claims, or fully refute them, the following needs to happen: 1) All of the documents, letters, and memos Vigano mentions in his report, which he says will corroborate many of his claims, must be released to the public. 2) Every person in the Vatican hierarchy with any knowledge of the situation must come forward and speak. 3) A full investigation must be conducted. 4) Pope Francis must answer these charges personally, not through statements issued by Vatican lawyers.

If none of these measures are taken, Catholic faithful will have no choice but to assume that the cover-up is ongoing and Francis is involved in it. He will have left them no other option. Pope Francis can no longer be given the benefit of the doubt. If he allows the doubt to fester, then the benefit will go to Vigano. The time for blind acceptance is over. The men at the very top of the hierarchy must be humbled. They must explain themselves. They are not gods. They are servants of God. Now it is time for them to act like it.

Pope Francis once exhorted Christians to “answer for themselves.” Now I exhort him to do the same. And there is no time to waste.
Wow. Bombshell.
__________________
Scott me up Beamy.

Other Fun Forums:

Weekend Mudders + Net Tractor and RTV Talk + Net Cooking Talk
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Doc For This Useful Post:
jim slagle  (08-29-2018), pirate_girl (08-29-2018)
  #24  
Old 08-29-2018, 10:22 AM
pirate_girl's Avatar
pirate_girl pirate_girl is offline
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 43,043
Thanks: 7,910
Thanked 16,849 Times in 6,456 Posts
pirate_girl is on a distinguished road
Default Re: WALSH: There Must Be A Purge In The Catholic Church. And It Must Be Brutal.

Name:  Scandal pope 215053_600.jpg
Views: 32
Size:  88.9 KB
__________________
Mother Superior Nana Patriot Nurse
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pirate_girl For This Useful Post:
Doc  (08-29-2018), jim slagle  (08-29-2018)
  #25  
Old 08-29-2018, 03:08 PM
pirate_girl's Avatar
pirate_girl pirate_girl is offline
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 43,043
Thanks: 7,910
Thanked 16,849 Times in 6,456 Posts
pirate_girl is on a distinguished road
Default Re: WALSH: There Must Be A Purge In The Catholic Church. And It Must Be Brutal.

https://toledodiocese.org/announceme...-in-the-church

The Bishop's letter, from the Toledo Diocese.
You'll have to click on the link, Letter To The Faithful..
__________________
Mother Superior Nana Patriot Nurse
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pirate_girl For This Useful Post:
Doc  (08-29-2018), jim slagle  (08-29-2018)
  #26  
Old 08-31-2018, 03:52 AM
jim slagle's Avatar
jim slagle jim slagle is offline
Cold Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,180
Thanks: 24,551
Thanked 12,057 Times in 5,630 Posts
jim slagle is on a distinguished road
Default Re: WALSH: There Must Be A Purge In The Catholic Church. And It Must Be Brutal.

More Than 10,000 Catholic Women Have Signed Open Letter To Pope Francis: “We Need Your Answers”
Posted at 9:30 pm on August 30, 2018 by Sarah Quinlan

https://www.redstate.com/sarahquinla...-need-answers/

Earlier today, lay Catholic women published an open letter to Pope Francis, in which they urged him to provide clarity regarding the recent allegations from Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò about Pope Francis’ knowledge of the Catholic Church sex abuse. More than 10,000 Catholic women have signed onto the letter since it was published earlier today.

The letter begins by emphasizing the damage caused by both the abuse itself and the subsequent cover-ups:

Quote:
Our hearts are broken, our faith tested, by the escalating crisis engulfing our beloved Church. We are angry, betrayed and disillusioned. The pain and suffering of the victims never ends, as each news cycle brings more horrific revelations of sexual abuse, sexual misconduct, cover-ups, and deceit—even at the Church’s highest levels.
The letter then refers to Archbishop Viganò’s recent testimony and Pope Francis’ response, in which he declined to provide direct answers:

Quote:
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò’s recent statement impels us to reach out to you directly for answers. His testimony accuses you, Holy Father, and highly placed cardinals of turning a blind eye to former Cardinal McCarrick’s egregious behavior, and promoting this predator as a global spokesman and spiritual leader. Is this true?


Several crucial questions raised by Archbishop Viganò’s statement, however, require neither lengthy investigations nor physical evidence. They require only your direct response, Holy Father. When reporters questioned you recently about Archbishop Viganò’s charges, you replied, “I will not say a single word on this.” You told reporters to “read the statement carefully and make your own judgment.”
The women criticize the lack of accountability and urge the pope to to provide “leadership, truth, and transparency”:

Quote:
To your hurting flock, Pope Francis, your words are inadequate. They sting, reminiscent of the clericalism you so recently condemned. We need leadership, truth, and transparency. We, your flock, deserve your answers now.
The women then ask Pope Francis to answer three specific questions:

Quote:
Is this true? What did Archbishop Viganò convey to you in June 2013 about then-Cardinal McCarrick?

When did you learn of any allegations of sexual abuse or sexual misconduct with adults by then-Cardinal McCarrick?

When did you learn of Pope Benedict’s restrictions on then-Cardinal McCarrick? And did you release then-Cardinal McCarrick from any of Pope Benedict’s restrictions?
Alexandra DeSanctis is a National Review staff writer who has covered the abuse extensively and who recently joined RedState assistant editor Andrea Ruth and senior contributor Kimberly Ross on The Right Side podcast to discuss the Church’s sexual abuse. She tweeted that the letter proved, contrary to how some organizations have covered the abuse, that the only things Catholics want are honesty and accountability.Earlier today, lay Catholic women published an open letter to Pope Francis, in which they urged him to provide clarity regarding the recent allegations from Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò about Pope Francis’ knowledge of the Catholic Church sex abuse. More than 10,000 Catholic women have signed onto the letter since it was published earlier today.

The letter begins by emphasizing the damage caused by both the abuse itself and the subsequent cover-ups:

Our hearts are broken, our faith tested, by the escalating crisis engulfing our beloved Church. We are angry, betrayed and disillusioned. The pain and suffering of the victims never ends, as each news cycle brings more horrific revelations of sexual abuse, sexual misconduct, cover-ups, and deceit—even at the Church’s highest levels.
The letter then refers to Archbishop Viganò’s recent testimony and Pope Francis’ response, in which he declined to provide direct answers:

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò’s recent statement impels us to reach out to you directly for answers. His testimony accuses you, Holy Father, and highly placed cardinals of turning a blind eye to former Cardinal McCarrick’s egregious behavior, and promoting this predator as a global spokesman and spiritual leader. Is this true?



Several crucial questions raised by Archbishop Viganò’s statement, however, require neither lengthy investigations nor physical evidence. They require only your direct response, Holy Father. When reporters questioned you recently about Archbishop Viganò’s charges, you replied, “I will not say a single word on this.” You told reporters to “read the statement carefully and make your own judgment.”
The women criticize the lack of accountability and urge the pope to to provide “leadership, truth, and transparency”:

To your hurting flock, Pope Francis, your words are inadequate. They sting, reminiscent of the clericalism you so recently condemned. We need leadership, truth, and transparency. We, your flock, deserve your answers now.
The women then ask Pope Francis to answer three specific questions:

Is this true? What did Archbishop Viganò convey to you in June 2013 about then-Cardinal McCarrick?

When did you learn of any allegations of sexual abuse or sexual misconduct with adults by then-Cardinal McCarrick?

When did you learn of Pope Benedict’s restrictions on then-Cardinal McCarrick? And did you release then-Cardinal McCarrick from any of Pope Benedict’s restrictions?
Alexandra DeSanctis is a National Review staff writer who has covered the abuse extensively and who recently joined RedState assistant editor Andrea Ruth and senior contributor Kimberly Ross on The Right Side podcast to discuss the Church’s sexual abuse. She tweeted that the letter proved, contrary to how some organizations have covered the abuse, that the only things Catholics want are honesty and accountability.

The Catholic hierarchy has attempted to change the subject in recent days, but, as RedState contributor Jim Jamitis wrote, “the denial and hesitation never brings about a better situation.” As this letter shows, the Catholic laity are not willing to stay silent, and they are demanding their leaders take accountability and show leadership.

The full letter is available here. https://catholicwomensforum.org/lett...-francis/#sign

The views expressed here are those of the author and do not represent those of any other individual or entity. Follow Sarah on Twitter: @sarahmquinlan.
__________________
.

The United States Constitution ©1787. All Rights Reserved

Sometimes I'm fast. Most of the time I'm half fast!

Never put off till tomorrow what you can avoid all together!

Friends come and go, but enemies accumulate

FF REQUIRES NO PHYSICAL FITNESS PROGRAM.
EVERYONE GETS ENOUGH EXERCISE JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, FLYING
OFF THE HANDLE, RUNNING DOWN THE MODERATORS, KNIFING FRIENDS IN THE
BACK, DODGING RESPONSIBILITY AND PUSHING THEIR LUCK.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-31-2018, 11:15 PM
jim slagle's Avatar
jim slagle jim slagle is offline
Cold Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,180
Thanks: 24,551
Thanked 12,057 Times in 5,630 Posts
jim slagle is on a distinguished road
Default Re: WALSH: There Must Be A Purge In The Catholic Church. And It Must Be Brutal.

More . . .
Attached Images
   
__________________
.

The United States Constitution ©1787. All Rights Reserved

Sometimes I'm fast. Most of the time I'm half fast!

Never put off till tomorrow what you can avoid all together!

Friends come and go, but enemies accumulate

FF REQUIRES NO PHYSICAL FITNESS PROGRAM.
EVERYONE GETS ENOUGH EXERCISE JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, FLYING
OFF THE HANDLE, RUNNING DOWN THE MODERATORS, KNIFING FRIENDS IN THE
BACK, DODGING RESPONSIBILITY AND PUSHING THEIR LUCK.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OBAMA vrs THE Catholic Church FrancSevin Religious Debate Forum 4 08-18-2012 02:32 AM
Catholic Church Sue the USA FrancSevin Religious Debate Forum 6 05-22-2012 04:51 PM
Obama and the Catholic Church pirate_girl Religious Debate Forum 2 10-04-2011 12:17 AM
Pedophilia in the Catholic church jpr62902 Religious Debate Forum 80 07-26-2011 09:30 PM
Blair joins Catholic Church thcri Open Forum 0 12-22-2007 11:46 PM





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2018 www.ForumsForums.com