Forums Forums - Off Topic Forum FUN

Go Back   Forums Forums - Off Topic Forum FUN > Off Topic Forums > Private Investing Forum

Private Investing Forum Discussion of Stocks and Strategies

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-15-2019, 05:31 PM
Bamby's Avatar
Bamby Bamby is offline
Silver Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Near Wheeling W.V.
Posts: 4,322
Thanks: 1,038
Thanked 7,460 Times in 2,406 Posts
Bamby will become famous soon enough
Style: T66_BiggerFont
Default Why Many Of Todays Most Owned Stocks Are Ponzi Schemes

Too much phantom wealth vs cash flow

Stocks provide a return to today's investors via two mechanisms: dividends and capital gains.

Dividends provide and income stream which can be quantiatively values. Capital gains result from speculation -- an expectation that future dividends will be higher than the market currently expects.

But what's the value of a company that continuously pays no dividends and does not appear as if it ever will in the foreseeable future?

Former financier and current statistician Tan Liu, author of the recent book The Ponzi Factor: The Simple Truth About Investment Profits explains how many of today's perpetually dividend-less companies traded on the public market are operating as ponzi schemes by definition.

As a result, a substantial amount of the market capitalization of our stock market is actually "phantom wealth" that doesn't truly exist. It will vaporize during the next financial crisis as investors proiritize cash flows in-hand over the promises of starry-eyed CEOs:

When it comes to stocks, there are two ways of making money. There are capital gains and there are dividends.

In the case of dividends, thereís nothing wrong with those, because they comes from the profits of the underlying company itself.

But the issue is with capital gains, the whole buy low/sell high gamble that's promoted 99% of the time on CNBC, financial news networks, and is also the focus of a lot of financial research.

The issue with capital gains is that they come from other investors. When one investor buys a stock for $100 and then sells it for $110, that extra $10 (or actually the full $110) theyíre getting is not coming from the company. It comes from another investor, who will then need to sell it to yet another investor.

So when one person buys low and sells high, another is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher. And a system where current investorsí profits are dependent on cash from new investors is by definition how a Ponzi scheme works.

Whatís wrong with that is a lot of stocks donít pay dividends and why are you an owner of a company if the company never pays the so-called owners?

thatís exactly how it works because when a stock doesnít pay dividends, there is no monetary connection between the revenues and profits of the company and the actual shares.

And the only thing thatís really increasing is just this Ponzi process of one investor trading money with another investor. And itís fundamentally different from the money itself that investors ultimately want. No one actually wants to buy stocks and say hey. I donít ever want my money back. I just want stocks and I want to watch that value grow. And I never want my money back.

Wrong. Everyone wants their money back. Because a stock is essentially completely worthless unless you can get your money back. And every investor that buys stocks wants more money than they contribute.

But if investors are the only ones contributing money into the system, how on earth can they all make money from it? Thatís really the bottom line. A stock without dividends is really just a Ponzi asset and there is no monetary connection to the company.

So therefore, itís not a real equity instrument at all and furthermore, we can see this because some people say oh, well stocks are real property. How can it be real property if literally companies can print this stuff like toilet paper at any time they want? Real property takes time to replicate.

People forget that the reason why stocks were equity instruments to begin with is that they all pay dividends, according to history. Before the 1900s, all stocks paid dividends and there was a monetary connection between the shareholders and the companies that they owned.

Thatís how stocks were supposed to work. It was supposed to be that simple. You buy a piece of a company; it makes money; you make money. But thatís not how stocks work now. This idea that stocks can literally have no dividends and these companies can make billions and never pay dividends indefinitely.

Or that these companies can continue losing money and keep printing stocks? In the case of Tesla and many others, this is a new concept that came out over the past 100 years or so. So the way that stocks work now is fundamentally different from how they actually were designed to work and how they worked before the 1900s.

And a stock without dividends when there is no monetary connection to that company should never be seen as an equity ownership instrument.

Peak Prosperity
We could produce all our needs, yet they'd be found to expensive.
Businesses close simply because they can't compete with import prices.
Priced high enough to cover costs and make a living,
our products are simply to expensive to market.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bamby For This Useful Post:
Danang Sailor (02-16-2019), Doc  (02-15-2019), mla2ofus (02-15-2019)
Old 02-15-2019, 08:58 PM
waybomb's Avatar
waybomb waybomb is offline
Silver Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South of the North Pole
Posts: 6,843
Thanks: 807
Thanked 2,445 Times in 948 Posts
waybomb will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Why Many Of Todays Most Owned Stocks Are Ponzi Schemes

BRK-A pays no dividend.
In 1988 a.share was about $4800.00.
A shard closed today at $308,000.
Today's gain was a little less than that share cost in 1988.

Your call.
Thanks Fred
NASA says I am not warming the globe, 24 cylinders at a time.

I'd rather be burning gas up at an alarming rate in Plain Vanilla.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to waybomb For This Useful Post:
Danang Sailor (02-16-2019), Doc  (02-15-2019), jpr62902  (02-15-2019)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trump Tax Schemes? Audit the Clinton Foundation! jim slagle Political Debate Forum 0 10-06-2018 12:31 PM
Biggest Ponzi Scheme In The History Of The World Bamby Off Topic Debate Forum 3 06-24-2013 01:31 PM
SS a Ponzi Scheme? No Way! CityGirl Open Forum 2 01-13-2009 08:46 AM
Madoff ain't got nothin' on Ponzi Schemes. THIS is a Ponzi Scheme! CityGirl Open Forum 1 01-07-2009 02:32 PM
6 Retarded Gas Saving Schemes Deadly Sushi Junkman's Corner 3 07-15-2008 08:28 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2002 - 2020