-
Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/
Toons For The Times
- Thread starter pirate_girl
- Start date
- Status
So, there is such a thing as an "assault bridge"
Who knew!!!!???!!
DAYUM,,,,, we must get congress on this immediately and stop the threat.
So, there is such a thing as an "assault bridge"
Who knew!!!!???!!
DAYUM,,,,, we must get congress on this immediately and stop the threat.
Civilians never need an assault bridge! Ban them NOW!
:th_lmao:
I warned people about Trump.
Today he stated that he is going to ban bump stocks. He gave even more money to planned parenthood. Will take guns without due process. And to top things off he further raised our debt.
Honestly why do liberals hate this guy?
He cheats like Bill Clinton, he spends like Obama, understands economics as well as Bernie Sanders and lies like Elizabeth Warren.
Today he stated that he is going to ban bump stocks. He gave even more money to planned parenthood. Will take guns without due process. And to top things off he further raised our debt.
Honestly why do liberals hate this guy?
He cheats like Bill Clinton, he spends like Obama, understands economics as well as Bernie Sanders and lies like Elizabeth Warren.
Attachments
Not exactly,,,;
He didn't write the omnibus spending bill. Not one page of it.
Bump stocks are questionable. I've said that from the start. They create full automatic fire. Either we allow full auto or we don't. As for now, we don't.
He clarified the "due process" comment, and it means in critical situations remove the threat. Frankly cops do it now with domestic violence. Anytime someone appears to be a threat, removing the guns until a review proves otherwise, is not avoiding due process.
As for Planned Parenthood,,,,No Our GOP Congress did that
They also spent money we don't have.
I do wish he had vetoed the bill. But he claims he was looking out for the troops. Maybe so, maybe not. But maybe he has concerns the Never Trumpers from the swamp would let our troops suffer so they could politicaly hurt him.
Trump abandons our troops over his damn Wall Funding!!!!
I think had he vetoed the bill THAT would be the headline.
Let's try to remember,,,, CONGRESS IS SUPPOSED TO PASS A BUDGET!!! Instead, they just spent money. THEY DID IT!
Why then are you blaming President Trump?
He signed it. He promised to eliminate our debt in 8 years. He signed a record debt buster bill. He can be blamed.
Full Auto is legal in many states. Bump stocks are just a toy.
Clarifying 'due process' comments and actually following due process are very different. He acts like a dictator.
In fact he acts like a dictator but can't get his own views represented in the budget! Didn't get funding for the wall, or even more border agents. Funded abortionists. Yup, he's a hell of a deal maker. So much so that Chuck Schumer claimed victory and said he is getting more done as the minority party than he'd get if he was the majority leader.
I was, and am not, a "never Trumper" but was cautious optimistic that he might pull off some great things. We got a potentially great supreme court judge. He gets credit for that.
It should be obvious by now that the Republican leadership has lied and betrayed the people. And President Trump. They wrote this bill and passed it. In doing so they willingly worked with the "never Trump Democrats" to box him in.
My question was "why are you blaming President Trump for what is in the bill?" Your explanation doesn't answer that.
It's clear the establishment of both parties want him to fail, and at the expense of the country. Otherwise they would not have passed this garbage and placed it on his desk. Yelling at the President will not change them or the government's current abuses of power.
Trump faces re-election in 2020. Most of Congress faces it this November. That's when we the people can deal with them. Unless we give our Country a better set of representatives, our President will be powerless to keep his promises. America faced a tough choice in 2016. If you are unhappy with the outcome perhaps we can reverse it in 2020 by giving Hilary a chance.
Trump and the GOP would have been better off in the long run if Trump would have EXPLAINED TO THE PEOPLE, in much the way President Reagan so often did, that the bill was a bust and just a big bureaucratic mess. He should have gone on air, in a Presidential Address, and listed off all the problems with this bill. Highlighting all the things he campaigned against that were put into the bill.
He could have built public support. He could have turned the tide.
Nope, he failed and therefore he is to blame. Clearly and simply it all rests on him for his inaction to fight. He's the 'deal maker' and he just approved a horrible deal. So it rests with him. Buck stops somewhere. Stops on his desk.
He could have built public support. He could have turned the tide.
Nope, he failed and therefore he is to blame. Clearly and simply it all rests on him for his inaction to fight. He's the 'deal maker' and he just approved a horrible deal. So it rests with him. Buck stops somewhere. Stops on his desk.
He could have, he should have, opinions convenient to someone who doesn't have to answer for making such decisions. Theoretically the Congress speaks for the people. He didn't resist that power.
I too am disappointed. However,
Your first comment blamed Trump for writing the content of the bill. An implication of him being part of it's creation. On that point I say your reference is mistaken.. He didn't compose the mess. Against his wishes and advice,,,; Congress did.
And to that point, apparently, we will never agree.
Frankly, this is not a discussion thread. If I had a cartoon that responded to your original comments, I would have used it. I think we have abused the rules enough here.
Move it to a proper thread or let it go.
regards
Last edited:
Franc, no rules about discussing anything in this very general toons for the times thread. No problem. No rule broke.
It is easier to find an old thread if it is somewhere else but if the toon prompts comments and discussion we do not have any problem with that. I do agree with you that Trump did not draft the monstrosity, but very very disappointed that he signed it. Lots of talk then the wrong action IMO.
----------------
Hey NRA ....
It is easier to find an old thread if it is somewhere else but if the toon prompts comments and discussion we do not have any problem with that. I do agree with you that Trump did not draft the monstrosity, but very very disappointed that he signed it. Lots of talk then the wrong action IMO.
----------------
Hey NRA ....
Attachments
- Status