• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Chuck Grassley Has Sent Multiple Requests to Brett Kavanaugh's Accuser for Testimony,

Jim_S

Gone But Not Forgotten
GOLD Site Supporter
Chuck Grassley Has Sent Multiple Requests to Brett Kavanaugh's Accuser for Testimony, She Isn't Responding
Katie Pavlich| @KatiePavlich |Posted: Sep 18, 2018 10:40 AM

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katie...ley-to-testify-about-her-accusations-n2520092

The woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of attempted rape nearly 40 years ago, Stanford professor Christine Blasey Ford, isn't responding to requests from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley to testify about her claims.

"We still haven't heard from Dr. Ford, so do they want to have the hearing or not?" Grassley said during an interview with Salem Radio host Hugh Hewitt Tuesday morning. "We have reached out to her in the last 36 hours, three or four times by email and we have not heard from them. It kind of raises the question do they want to come to the public hearing or not? The reason we're having the public hearing is obviously, well number one, accusations like this deserve consideration and looking into and that's what the purpose of the hearing is. We wouldn't be having the hearing if Dr. Ford told the Washington Post and other people publicly she wanted to testify."

"We're delaying the vote strictly to get all the facts out on the table," he continued.

Yesterday, Ford's attorney said her client was willing to testify under oath. As of this writing, she has not accepted the invitation by the Committee to do so.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh has accepted the invitation to testify and is scheduled to be Capitol Hill Monday. According to Grassley, if Ford refuses to show up, the hearing could be canceled.


"Judge Kavanaugh, even before we requested him to testify, he said he was willing to testify. As of Sunday night I had that message.

Grassley also revealed the FBI isn't investigating Kavanaugh, despite Democrat demands to delay Kavanaugh's confirmation vote until "a thorough investigation is completed."
 

FrancSevin

Proudly Deplorable
GOLD Site Supporter
Dr. Ford's collusion with Senator Feinstein, and the Democrats, is nothing more than a really stinky red Herring. Everyone in the Senate knows the truth of this and that, once the vote is taken, Judge Cavanaugh will be approved. Unless, of course they can delay it beyond the Mid terms.

All the bluster and hypocritical lies are being made in the hopes they Democrats will win enough seats to defeat ANY Trump nominees.

Meanwhile, the people's work is not getting done.
 

jimbo

Bronze Member
GOLD Site Supporter
Chuck Grassley Has Sent Multiple Requests to Brett Kavanaugh's Accuser for Testimony, She Isn't Responding
Katie Pavlich| @KatiePavlich |Posted: Sep 18, 2018 10:40 AM

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katie...ley-to-testify-about-her-accusations-n2520092

The woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of attempted rape nearly 40 years ago, Stanford professor Christine Blasey Ford, isn't responding to requests from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley to testify about her claims.

"We still haven't heard from Dr. Ford, so do they want to have the hearing or not?" Grassley said during an interview with Salem Radio host Hugh Hewitt Tuesday morning. "We have reached out to her in the last 36 hours, three or four times by email and we have not heard from them. It kind of raises the question do they want to come to the public hearing or not? The reason we're having the public hearing is obviously, well number one, accusations like this deserve consideration and looking into and that's what the purpose of the hearing is. We wouldn't be having the hearing if Dr. Ford told the Washington Post and other people publicly she wanted to testify."

"We're delaying the vote strictly to get all the facts out on the table," he continued.

Yesterday, Ford's attorney said her client was willing to testify under oath. As of this writing, she has not accepted the invitation by the Committee to do so.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh has accepted the invitation to testify and is scheduled to be Capitol Hill Monday. According to Grassley, if Ford refuses to show up, the hearing could be canceled.


"Judge Kavanaugh, even before we requested him to testify, he said he was willing to testify. As of Sunday night I had that message.

Grassley also revealed the FBI isn't investigating Kavanaugh, despite Democrat demands to delay Kavanaugh's confirmation vote until "a thorough investigation is completed."

Of course she won't show up. She's got nothing but unsupported, even debunked, lies.

I don't see this as anything but a made up stall.

Just vote. Flake is a lost cause, but his successor won't be. If the two or three RINO's vote no. Hammer home the reason to vote R in November.
 

tiredretired

The Old Salt
SUPER Site Supporter
This leftist liar and her attorney may be having 2nd thoughts on their scheme.

This is not like accusing 21 year old college Lacrosse players, they best realize they are preparing to lie under oath on the selection of a Supreme Court Justice. Before serious Republican Senators.

Her Attorneys involved can throw away their license to practice, the liar and her illusion will be considered worthless as a professor.
 

Bamby

New member
She can't prove his guilt any more than he can prove his innocence. She could be lying but without unsubstantiated evidence she can and will get away with perjury and noting can or will be done about it. Therefore the cloud of doubt will foreshadow his future supreme court or not.
 

tiredretired

The Old Salt
SUPER Site Supporter
I remember Clarence Thomas, after he ran the gauntlet, proclaiming that he was going to be a thorn in the side of the Liberals for the whole time that he serves.

So far, mission accomplished.

Next.

If Kav was going to leave Roe v Wade alone, now he's not.
 
Top