• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Dr Kermit Gosnell found guilty of Murder

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Let us not pretend that he is the only one out there doing this.

The reality is there are many out there doing late term murders of live born children.
 

Doc

Bottoms Up
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
I do think most realize he is not the only one ....but we are thankful this is finally being judged and called for what it is: MURDER.
 

JEV

Mr. Congeniality
GOLD Site Supporter
ABCnews.com, CBSnews.com & PMSDNC.com all have the abortion story as top billing. CNN has it as a sidebar story, with the IRS bullshit taking top billing. I report...you decide.
 

waybomb

Well-known member
GOLD Site Supporter
Now wait, he aborted the life of an unwanted baby. What's the difference if it's still inside or outside?

The phukin hypocrisy astounds me.
 

FrancSevin

Proudly Deplorable
GOLD Site Supporter
This came out today from one of thoses extremist TEA's.




Dear Concerned American,

For 40 years, nine unelected men and women on the Supreme Court have played God with innocent human life.

They have invented laws that condemned to painful deaths without trial more than 56 million babies for the crime of being "inconvenient."

In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade ruling forced abortion-on-demand down our nation's throat.

In the past, many in the pro-life movement have felt limited to protecting a life here and there -- passing some limited law to slightly control abortion in the more outrageous cases.

But some pro-lifers always seem to tiptoe around the Supreme Court, hoping they won't be offended.

Now the time to grovel before the Supreme Court is over.

Working from what the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade, pro-life lawmakers can pass a Life at Conception Act and end abortion using the Constitution instead of amending it.

That is why it's so urgent you sign the petition to your Senators and Congressman that I will link to in a moment.

You see, in the coming year it is vital every Member of Congress be put on record.

And your petition today will help do just that.

Signing the Life at Conception Act petition will help break through the opposition clinging to abortion-on-demand and get a vote on this life-saving bill to overturn Roe v. Wade.

A Life at Conception Act declares unborn children "persons" as defined by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, entitled to legal protection.

This is the one thing the Supreme Court admitted in Roe v. Wade that would cause the case for legal abortion to "collapse."

When the Supreme Court handed down its now-infamous Roe v. Wade decision, it did so based on a new, previously undefined "right of privacy" which it "discovered" in so-called "emanations" of "penumbrae" of the Constitution.

Of course, as constitutional law it was a disaster.

But never once did the Supreme Court declare abortion itself to be a constitutional right.

Instead the Supreme Court said:

"We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins . . . the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."

Then the High Court made a key admission:

"If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case [i.e., "Roe" who sought an abortion], of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment."

The fact is, the 14th Amendment couldn't be clearer:

". . . nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law."

Furthermore, the 14th Amendment says:

"Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

That's exactly what a Life at Conception Act would do.

But this simple, logical and obviously right legislation will not become law without a fight.



SENATOR RAND PAUL
 

FrancSevin

Proudly Deplorable
GOLD Site Supporter
Speaking of Hypocrites;
Al Sharpton: Gosnell Is Product Of Pro-Life Movement


by Philip Hodges

Liberals in the media have to condemn Gosnell. Even though what Gosnell did was really no different than what any other abortionist does on a regular, basis, they knew that they couldn’t defend him. The details of the case were too horrific for anyone to publicly defend.
So, people like Pelosi called his actions “disgusting.” And Al Sharpton said that justice had been delivered to Gosnell when the jury found him guilty of murder.
But he didn’t focus so much on the fact that Gosnell murdered postnatal babies. He said that this was more of a women’s rights issue; that Gosnell “preyed on poor women…low income women who felt they had nowhere else to go, who didn’t have access to quality healthcare.”
And he was quick to remind viewers that pro-lifers are just trying to use this one case to paint all abortionists with a broad brush:
“Of course some of the right are trying to use this horrific case to attack all abortion rights, to claim women shouldn’t be able to make their own choices about medical procedures that are safe and legal. In fact, House Republicans have already used Gosnell to call for an investigation of clinics all over the country. But if conservatives succeed in scaling back safe, legal access to abortion, we’ll have more Kermit Gosnell’s, not less. Today, the jury reached its verdict. Now, it’s up to all of us to make sure women keep the right to control their own bodies.”
Making abortion illegal would certainly drive that industry underground, and there might be more Gosnell types than there are now, but that doesn’t mean that abortion must be a good thing. And just because there might be more Gosnell types driven underground doesn’t mean that the vast majority of abortionists would not have gone extinct. In total, there would be far fewer pre-natal murderers masquerading as OB doctors, and therefore far more babies’ lives saved. Of course, that’s supposed to be a bad thing, because then all the promiscuous women wouldn’t have “safe, legal” access to “health care.”


Abortion is not a women’s rights issue, unless you’re concerned with all the girl babies that are being murdered. Calling prenatal murder a “woman’s right” makes as much sense as saying that Andrea Yates had a “right” to drown her five kids in the bathtub.
And Sharpton agreed, albeit superficially, that Gosnell is guilty of murder, but he balked at the suggestion that abortion clinics be investigated to make sure there aren’t others like Gosnell.
But isn’t that what liberals want to do with “gun violence?” They want to restrict everybody’s access to firearms because of the actions of a relatively small group of criminals. They want every individual purchasing a gun to be involuntarily investigated by a background check. All because there are criminals out there who have used guns to commit crimes.
So, they should be in favor of “universal investigations” into the nation’s abortion clinics. If these clinics have done nothing wrong, they have nothing to hide, right? It’s common sense, like background checks and mental health checks for gun purchasers. Liberals claim they want those things to “save lives.” And we know that Gosnell’s case was by no means isolated. So, if liberals are agreeing that Dr. Gosnell is evil, and that his actions were “disgusting,” they should be in favor of finding out who else is murdering newborn babies. That would be saving lives.​

Then again, I don’t think liberals care about saving lives. They only use that excuse when it suits them. In reality, nothing makes them happier than being able to control every aspect of people’s lives.​






 

Kane

New member
Now wait, he aborted the life of an unwanted baby. What's the difference if it's still inside or outside?

The phukin hypocrisy astounds me.
Exactly. And bigots like the fake Reverend Al Sharpton will continue to frame resistance to abortion - all abortion - as the pro-life assault on the poor and disadvantaged black folk. When in reality, easy access to abortion represents the legal genocide of the black race.

Sanger was right. Or was she wrong?

In any event, I wonder how much it will cost the taxpayers to give this monster, Dr. Gosnell, his three squares a day for the rest of his miserable life. But, on the other hand, if he is placed in general population, the other inmates may 'help' save the taxpayers some money.
 
Top