• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Communists try to silence church leaders

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Maybe I am not remembering my history lessons correctly, but I was reading the story below and it struck me that the world has gone down this road before. This story is about the Green Party (communists) of Australia and they are trying to silence 2 church leaders who have spoken out against cloning.

Did not Stalin do something very similar? And Mussolini? And Mao?

I sure didn't expect to see a story like this come out of Australia, but now that I think about it, I am seeing signs of it happening here in the US. It does seem like anytime a church leader speaks out about a "moral" issue they are criticized. It seems to me that a church leader has the ability & the right to kick people out of his church who commit a gross violation against the faith. No?

18-June-2007-- Catholic World News Brief

Australia's Cardinal Pell Defies Parliamentary Threat


Sydney, Jun. 18, 2007 (CWNews.com) - Leaders of the Greens Party in Australia have begun a drive to cite Cardinal George Pell for contempt of parliament-- an effort that the cardinal described as carrying "a whiff of Stalinism."

Lee Rhiannon, a Greens lawmaker, won approval for a parliamentary hearing at which Cardinal Pell will be questioned about his statement that politicians who vote in favor of cloning should realize that their votes will have "consequences for their place in the life of the Church."

Rhiannon complained that the cardinal's remarks were intended to intimidate lawmakers. "Cardinal Pell has shown no remorse for his comments," she added.

The Sydney prelate responded by saying that he "would be privileged to appear before the committee if necessary, to resist this clumsy attempt to curb religious freedom and freedom of speech."

During a radio interview on June 17, Cardinal Pell added that he "never threatened anybody with a public excommunication." He continued to say that politicians who support cloning should recognize the moral consequences of their actions. And he declined to offer a direct answer to the question of whether he would refuse Communion to a politician who voted for the pending legislation.

Archbishop Barry Hickey of Perth, who had also been accused of threatening lawmakers by his public statements on the cloning proposal, took a different posture in his latest comments. In a letter to the Catholic newspaper The Record, he observed that his published statements might have inadvertently put pressure on Catholic politicians who were already planning to cast their votes in accordance with Church teaching. "They may feel compromised and be accused of voting at the bidding of the Church. If this is so, I owe them an apology because I have always admired their courage," Archbishop Hickey said.

 

daedong

New member
Pell's knell for stem-cell CatholicsRussell Skelton
June 7, 2007


rg0706_pell_narrowweb__300x427,0.jpg
Cardinal Pell has come under fire for his inflammatory comments about stem cell research.
Photo: Bob Pearce

CARDINAL George Pell has faced a tirade of criticism from NSW state Catholic MPs, including the Premier, Morris Iemma, and his deputy, John Watkins, for threatening them "with consequences" if they voted for legislation to expand stem-cell research.

Mr Iemma dismissed the threat, saying that he would not take kindly to being refused communion. "I've thought seriously about this legislation and it passes all the ethical and moral issues that I need passed, and gives people hope," he told State Parliament.

"I am convinced this is no time to stand in the way of science and thus stand in the way of hope — the opportunities for progress have never been greater."

Mr Watkins, also a Catholic, rejected Cardinal Pell's warning, saying he was "mystified" by the Cardinal's "authoritarian view". Mr Watkins said he would vote for the bill.

MPs have been allowed a conscience vote, which is expected to be held today. Supporters of the bill believe it will be passed with a comfortable majority by the NSW Legislative Assembly.

The Deputy Premier said he was at a loss to understand why the cardinal had not threatened federal MPs when a related bill was debated earlier this year.

The harshest words for the cardinal came from Emergency Services Minister Nathan Rees, who told Parliament the Archbishop of Sydney owed Catholic MPs an apology for his remarks.

Accusing the cardinal of "world-class hypocrisy", he said: "I consider Cardinal Pell's incursion a clear and arguably contemptuous incursion into deliberations of the elected members of this parliament, which he didn't exercise during the Commonwealth debate. I think he's got three options: he can apologise; he can run for parliament; or he can invite further comparisons with that serial boofhead, Sheikh Al Hilly (sic)."

Cardinal Pell yesterday declined to comment on the growing tide of criticism. Although there is no official transcript of his comments, his office believes that his criticism of MPs voting for the bill did not amount to a threat of excommunication.

Disabilities Minister Kristina Keneally, a staunch Catholic, said she would not vote for the bill. But even she was critical of Cardinal Pell's comments and insisted her decision had nothing to do with his threat. "His first attempt to comment on this matter was an authoritarian legalistic edict," she said.

Federal Workplace Relations Minister Joe Hockey said he objected to Cardinal Pell's threats. "I don't object to him expressing that opinion, but I do object to any suggestion that there are consequences," he said.

Federal Health Minister Tony Abbott, a devout Catholic, tried to calm the furore. "Cardinal Pell is entitled to say his piece. He is the leader of the Catholic church here in Australia."
http://www.theage.com.au/news/natio...mcell-catholics/2007/06/06/1181089152108.html

:tiphat::tiphat: Hi Bob


The Greens commo's !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:yum::yum::yum::yum::yum::yum:



Many church leaders in this country are way out of step with their own followers. (Note first paragraph in article above)

This is about stem cell research, There is many diseases this research will address.




Twist, misrepresent, distort, or maybe you just don't understand, see it the way you want, but Bob you have it all wrong.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Many church leaders in this country are way out of step with their own followers.
I believe it is the other way around, the church argues that the followers are out of step with the dogma of the church. The church (at least most organized churches) is not a democracy.
 

daedong

New member
I believe it is the other way around, the church argues that the followers are out of step with the dogma of the church. The church (at least most organized churches) is not a democracy.


Why then has every church (religion) in history changed it doctrine.

The fact is you misquoted and misrepresented the Australian Greens WHY DID YOU DO THAT?
 

DaveNay

Klaatu barada nikto
SUPER Site Supporter
Bob, while I might not agree with most of what the Green Party(s) represent, I have seen no evidence that they are a communist party. I'd really like to hear what causes you to have this opinion.
 

Junkman

Extra Super Moderator
Bob, while I might not agree with most of what the Green Party(s) represent, I have seen no evidence that they are a communist party. I'd really like to hear what causes you to have this opinion.


His religious beliefs???????
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Bob, while I might not agree with most of what the Green Party(s) represent, I have seen no evidence that they are a communist party. I'd really like to hear what causes you to have this opinion.
World wide the Greens are considered to be strong allies of the formal Communist and Socialist parties, the 4 pillars of the Green movement, the foundation on which the Green party stands are positions that are clearly central government dominated and in common harbor with Socialist and Communist ideology. Greens tend to be more vocal for enviornmental issues and that does separate them formally from the official Communist parties, but their beliefs about health and education are clearly from the Socialist/Communist playbook. Their beliefs about labor center on what they consider "fair" wages and "job security" issues which are clearly in concert with the socialist/communist agenda. So while not formally big "C" Communists they are certainly communist/socialist in their beliefs.

Sorry if you don't see the evidence of that, you might need to dig deeper.

Bear in mind that we in the US are far more conservative than the folks in other nations. To us a liberal is someone like DaveNay. But DaveNay would probably be considered either a moderate or a conservative in places like the UK or OZ.
 

DaveNay

Klaatu barada nikto
SUPER Site Supporter
So while not formally big "C" Communists they are certainly communist/socialist in their beliefs.

I think some of our members from Europe might also take issue with your lumping socialists with communists.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
I think some of our members from Europe might also take issue with your lumping socialists with communists.
They are free to do so.

The reality is a socialist is simply a communist who has not yet confiscated all the guns from the subjects of the nation.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Nobody, just being the honest/blunt/jerk that I am. Oh, and I do have a nice silk Hawaiian shirt on today too.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Vin, I don't think I did misrepresent their true intentions (post 7) and I pretty much explained it farther up the thread.
 

daedong

New member
Why then has every church (religion) in history changed it doctrine.

The fact is you misquoted and misrepresented the Australian Greens WHY DID YOU DO THAT?

Ok Bob I will except you misguided views on the Greens but you have not answered the first question?
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
I can't speak for EVERY faith but I don't believe you are correct.

Many have changed facets but few have core doctrine/dogma. Many have made changes and then reversed them. Honestly people are fallible and can make errors, even leaders of churches.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Well here is a follow up on the story. It appears that common sense prevailed!


Australian Censureship:
Cardinal Pell to be interrogated by parliamentary committee


Sydney, Jun 20, 2007 / 10:48 am (CNA).- Australia’s Council of Civil Liberties has slammed the idea of having Cardinal George Pell interrogated by a parliamentary committee over his comments on therapeutic cloning and stem-cell research, calling it absurd.

"George Pell is entitled to freedom of speech and to engage in political discourse,'' council president Cameron Murphy said.

"From time to time you get all sorts of religious leaders who make comments that are out of step with the community, whether it's George Pell or Sheik Hilaly, and I think in a democratic society you have to have a degree of tolerance.”

The Greens Party yesterday won approval to have the cardinal interrogated by the parliamentary committee for contempt, reported The Telegraph.


Under the Crimes Act, contempt of Parliament is a highly serious offence punishable by up to 25 years in jail. The move, unheard of in recent history, was swiftly condemned as an absurd attack on free speech.

Cardinal Pell warned Catholic lawmakers last week that they would face religious consequences if they supported a bill allowing therapeutic cloning. The vast majority of MPs ignored the cardinal's warning and supported the bill, but numbers are expected to be closer when it goes to the Upper House later this month.

In an effort to muzzle the church leader ahead of the vote, Greens MP Lee Rhiannon pushed ahead with her contempt claims and yesterday won approval from Upper House president Peter Primrose.


Premier Morris Iemma and Opposition Leader Barry O'Farrell, both Catholics who voted against Cardinal Pell's wishes, also condemned the Greens’ push to have the cardinal interrogated.​
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
I think many people wrongly believe that Catholics are wrong. I'm also sure that most Catholics don't give that much consideration.
 

Cityboy

Banned
Catholics are OK. They throw some pretty cool weddings. :drink: The priest slams down a large goblet of wine during the ceremony and rings a golden bell between sips & everybody gets drunk at the reception...at least the ones I went to....:drink: :drink: :rock: All that kneeling and crossing by the congregation and chanting and bell ringing by the priest during the ceremony got me tickled....nope, didn't participate, just watched, heathen that I am. :D

But they're not as cool as Jewish weddings. Now there's some classy weddings with tuxedoed bar tenders right in the recepton hall of the synagogue handing out cold beers. :coolshade :beer:

Baptist weddings are no fun. No booze or dancing. Yup...first hand experience. If I ever get married again I'm gonna be Jewish. :thumb:

Methodists will at least speak to you when they see you in the liquor store.

Religon....intresting subject.
 
Top