• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

WHAT IS DIANNE FEINSTEIN HIDING?

Jim_S

Gone But Not Forgotten
GOLD Site Supporter
POSTED ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2018 BY PAUL MIRENGOFF IN BRETT KAVANAUGH, DIANNE FEINSTEIN

WHAT IS DIANNE FEINSTEIN HIDING?

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/09/what-is-dianne-feinstein-hiding.php

That letter Christine Blasey Ford gave to California Democratic lawmakers containing her allegation against Brett Kavanaugh must be a highly flawed document. First, Sen. Feinstein sat on it for months. She didn’t give it to the FBI. She didn’t publicize its contents.

She didn’t even use the allegations when she had opportunities to question Kavanaugh. Feinstein could easily have done so without violating Ford’s request for confidentiality. For example, she could have asked Kavanaugh whether he has ever, even in his high school days, used force against a female or made sexual contact with a female against her will.

Feinstein used the letter in none of these ways. As I said, she sat on it for months.

Second, even now, Feinstein will not provide the Senate Judiciary Committee with a non-redacted version of the letter. Chairman Grassley and his staff have repeatedly asked to see the letter in full. Obviously, this request is reasonable. If the Senate is to evaluate Ford’s allegation, it needs to see that allegation in its full original form.

Yet, Feinstein has refused the repeated requests of Grassley and his staff. Thus, as Grassley says, “the only version we have of this letter is a redacted version contained in the supplemental FBI background investigation file that only senators and a handful of very select staff are authorized to read.”

What is Feinstein hiding from the Committee and from the public? Weaknesses in the original statement? Contradictions between that statement and other statements and/or facts that have come to light?

I don’t know. But I’m pretty sure that if Feinstein believed Ford’s allegations and wanted the truth about them to be uncovered, she would not have acted as she has since receiving the letter, and certainly would not be acting as she is now.
 

FrancSevin

Proudly Deplorable
GOLD Site Supporter
POSTED ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2018 BY PAUL MIRENGOFF IN BRETT KAVANAUGH, DIANNE FEINSTEIN

WHAT IS DIANNE FEINSTEIN HIDING?

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/09/what-is-dianne-feinstein-hiding.php

That letter Christine Blasey Ford gave to California Democratic lawmakers containing her allegation against Brett Kavanaugh must be a highly flawed document. First, Sen. Feinstein sat on it for months. She didn’t give it to the FBI. She didn’t publicize its contents.

She didn’t even use the allegations when she had opportunities to question Kavanaugh. Feinstein could easily have done so without violating Ford’s request for confidentiality. For example, she could have asked Kavanaugh whether he has ever, even in his high school days, used force against a female or made sexual contact with a female against her will.

Feinstein used the letter in none of these ways. As I said, she sat on it for months.

Second, even now, Feinstein will not provide the Senate Judiciary Committee with a non-redacted version of the letter. Chairman Grassley and his staff have repeatedly asked to see the letter in full. Obviously, this request is reasonable. If the Senate is to evaluate Ford’s allegation, it needs to see that allegation in its full original form.

Yet, Feinstein has refused the repeated requests of Grassley and his staff. Thus, as Grassley says, “the only version we have of this letter is a redacted version contained in the supplemental FBI background investigation file that only senators and a handful of very select staff are authorized to read.”

What is Feinstein hiding from the Committee and from the public? Weaknesses in the original statement? Contradictions between that statement and other statements and/or facts that have come to light?

I don’t know. But I’m pretty sure that if Feinstein believed Ford’s allegations and wanted the truth about them to be uncovered, she would not have acted as she has since receiving the letter, and certainly would not be acting as she is now.


Senator Feinstein has nothing. Or she would have laid it before the committee months ago.

No this is just an unsupportable fact less charge which has the power of a broken Crescent wrench. It's a useless tool cannot fix or adjust anything but can create havoc if thrown into the running machinery at the last minute.

I hope Americans, if not Californians, can find a way to make her, Ms. Ford, and the DNC, pay for the damage incurred.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
I have to wonder if Senator Feinstein is/has violated any Senate ethics rules in how she handled this. Sadly I suspect she has not. What says a lot about Senate ethics.
 

tiredretired

The Old Salt
SUPER Site Supporter
This whole affair is predicated on the premise that this will supply the necessary cover for those Red State Dem. Senators to vote NO and have it not hurt them in their re-election bid. Also, there is the outside chance a couple of RHINO senators could be swayed and that would be the end of that.

In the end, not one Dem Senator will vote for Kavanaugh.

This whole affair just might work for the Dems. A brilliant maneuver. Stalin and Mao would be proud.
 

tiredretired

The Old Salt
SUPER Site Supporter
Here's the thing in all of this. The Republicans are the only ones I know who would fold with four aces in their hand. Unbelievable!
 
Top