• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

U. Cincinnati Officer Who Shot Sam DuBose Wins $350k Settlement From University

Jim_S

Gone But Not Forgotten
GOLD Site Supporter
U. Cincinnati Officer Who Shot Sam DuBose Wins $350k Settlement From University
Posted by Andrew Branca Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 9:00pm

https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/...-350k-settlement-from-university/#more-245075

Ray Tensig was tried twice for murder, with two hung juries, prosecutor finally gave up

Today the University of Cincinnati announced that it would settle a grievance brought by former UC police officer Ray Tensing by paying him almost $250,000 in back pay and $100,000 in legal fees he incurred, reports NBC and other sources.

On July 19, 2015, (then) Officer Tensing (who is white) shot and killed Sam DuBose (who is black) in the course of a traffic stop in which DuBose began to drive away from the stop with Tensing’s arm inside his vehicle. The events were captured on Tensing’s body camera. Tensing would claim he killed DuBose in self-defense.

The case occurred in the midst of the #BlackLivesMatter hysteria, however, and within 10 days of the shooting (a remarkably brief period) Prosecutor Joe Deters announced that he had obtained a murder indictment against Tensing.

I previously covered these events, including analysis of the body camera footage, right here at Legal Insurrection in this post: Sam DuBose Shooting: Let’s Go to the Video Tape. https://legalinsurrection.com/2015/07/sam-dubose-shooting-lets-go-to-the-video-tape/

[ame="http://youtube.com/watch?v=2BrKfbSK5sA"]Sam DuBose body cam video 7-29-15 - YouTube[/ame]
A
It is notable that Ohio is the only state in the country that places the burden of proof on self-defense on the defense to prove self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence. In the other 49 states, the Prosecution must disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Despite this favorable burden of proof for Prosecutor Deters, Tensing was tried for murder twice, with both cases resulting in a hung jury.

At that point Deters threw up his hands, declined to re-try Tensing a third time, and forwarded his files to the Department of Justice, which also took no action to bring Tensing to trial. We covered this, as well here at Legal Insurrection, in this post: No Third Trial for Cincinnati Officer Ray Tensing in Sam DuBose Shooting.

It is obvious that Tensing’s legal fees for two separate murder trials must have vastly exceeded the $100,000 in legal fee reimbursement he is receiving as part of the settlement, unless much of his legal expenses were covered by third-parties.

Nevertheless, a settlement of nearly $350,000 to an officer twice put before juries on a charge of murder, where both trials hung, in the state with the burden of proof on self-defense most favorable to the prosecution, is a clear demonstration of how weak that charge of murder proved to be.

–-Andrew

Andrew F. Branca is an attorney whose practice Law of Self Defense LLC focuses on self-defense law. He is also the host of the weekly “Law of Self Defense LIVE Show.”
 

rugerman

New member
When the media and public opinion are the reason that a police officer is tried for a bogus reason then there is a real need to look at how our legal system is being handled.
 

jpr62902

Jeanclaude Spam Banhammer
SUPER Site Supporter
When the media and public opinion are the reason that a police officer is tried for a bogus reason then there is a real need to look at how our legal system is being handled.

This was not a bogus prosecution. It was, however, overzealous. He should have been charged with manslaughter.
 

Jim_S

Gone But Not Forgotten
GOLD Site Supporter
This was not a bogus prosecution. It was, however, overzealous. He should have been charged with manslaughter.

Overzealous is the word for it. It all comes down to a few blurred moments on the video. Not murder, could be manslaughter, could be a justified shoot. I feel its justified but I haven’t seen any of the other evidence, pro or con.

This is what happened to the Baltimore Prosecutor with the 4 officers she charged with murder in the paddy wagon case a few years ago. She might have proven a lesser charge on one or two of them but she set the bar way too high with the murder charge.
 
Last edited:

jpr62902

Jeanclaude Spam Banhammer
SUPER Site Supporter
This was not a bogus prosecution. It was, however, overzealous. He should have been charged with manslaughter.

Good thing I don't criminal defense work. :smileywac Tensing was charged\indicted for manslaughter (in addition to murder). He should have been charged with reckless or negligent homicide.
 

road squawker

Active member
GOLD Site Supporter
Good thing I don't criminal defense work. :smileywac Tensing was chargedindicted for manslaughter (in addition to murder). He should have been charged with reckless or negligent homicide.

ERR, .......... He wasn't charged with "reckless" or "negligent" homicide because even the prosecutors knew his actions were not "reckless" or "negligent".

BY legal definition, a charge of"'Murder" and a charge of "reckless" homicide contradict each other.

a person can be charged with one OR the other, but not both. The actions are mutually exclusive.
 
Top