• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Plug-in Cars Could Drain U.S. Water Supply, Researcher Says

XeVfTEUtaAqJHTqq

Master of Distraction
Staff member
SUPER Site Supporter
Interesting perspective . . .

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/earth/4253590.html

How many gallons of water does it take you to drive to work every day? That’s the question Michael Webber, an assistant professor at the University of Texas at Austin, would like people to start asking themselves. The answer, of course, depends on how you get there.


digg_url = 'http://digg.com/environment/Plug_in_Hybrid_Cars_Could_Drain_U_S_Water_Supply_Study';reddit_url='/science/earth/4253590.htmlreddit_title='Plug-in Hybrid Cars Could Drain U.S. Water Supply: Researcher'
A 30-mile commute in a gasoline-powered car would require the withdrawal of 18.9 gallons of water, according to a study he co-authored this week in the journal Environmental Science & Technology. The same commute in a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV), meanwhile, would take a whopping 318 gallons. All told, electric miles necessitate threefold the water consumption and 17 times the water withdrawal of gasoline miles.

But wait, aren’t PHEVs the environmentally friendly choice? “If you are a plug-in hybrid owner and you have wind or solar power at your house, then you can feel really good about your plug-in hybrid using very little water, if any,” Webber told PM. “If you’re a hybrid owner and are plugging your car into the standard U.S. grid, then your car is not very clean, nor is it water-free.”

With the grid’s current composition, electricity production requires about 136,000 million gallons of freshwater per day, accounting for over 40 percent of all daily freshwater withdrawals in the nation. That’s because coal-fired and nuclear power plants that use steam to drive a turbine typically use water—vast amounts of water—to cool and condense the steam at the exhaust.

Though most of this water is returned to the source (albeit at a higher temperature), a 17-fold increase in demand would pose a real problem for water-stressed regions, making power plants more vulnerable to shut down during times of drought. Freshwater withdrawals already exceed precipitation in many areas across the country, according to a 2006 report by the Department of Energy, and groundwater levels have consequently dropped hundreds of feet.

In order to avoid having to choose between powering our cars and turning on the lights—or taking showers and driving to work—Webber concluded that Americans need to approach a plug-in vehicle culture cautiously. Upping the amount of wind and solar power in the national grid would be one way to reduce the impact; another would be to shift to air-cooled power plants, which are less efficient, but perhaps less costly to society in the end.

One thing we don’t want to do is leapfrog over hybrid-electric and into the drivers’ seats of 234 million vehicles powered by irrigated feedstocks. The USDA estimates that it requires 2200 gallons of water to grow a bushel of corn, which only averages 2.7 gallons of ethanol. We could get further with an aboveground pool’s worth of water by swimming in it.
 

DaveNay

Klaatu barada nikto
SUPER Site Supporter
Interesting, but perhaps not true. The fundamental problem with this theory is that in all but a very very few circumstances is water actually ever "consumed". Water is very frequently dirtied and polluted during it's use, but almost never is it "consumed". Abundant fresh water is a solvable problem (not saying it actually is solved, but it is certainly solvable), whereas oil (which is fundamentally "consumed" in it's usage) has a finite supply, even if we don't know that finite quantity yet.
 

urednecku

Active member
Site Supporter
I agree, Dave. The water is still there, in some form. Liquid, ice, steam, or vapor, it's still H2O.
What I have been wondering, after hurricane Charlie came thru, we were told to make sure the home generators were NOT connected to the lines coming INTO the house, because the same transformer that reduces the in-coming voltage to 220 for home use, would jump it back up to the same power normally coming in on the supply lines. IF that is the case, (at least theoretically), we should be able to supply the United States with electrical power from ONE, small, generator? Just with a series of transformers?? And that ONE generator could be powered by water, therfore, FREE ELECTRICITY, except for the low cost of up-keep of lines & transformers.
 

DaveNay

Klaatu barada nikto
SUPER Site Supporter
What I have been wondering, after hurricane Charlie came thru, we were told to make sure the home generators were NOT connected to the lines coming INTO the house, because the same transformer that reduces the in-coming voltage to 220 for home use, would jump it back up to the same power normally coming in on the supply lines. IF that is the case, (at least theoretically), we should be able to supply the United States with electrical power from ONE, small, generator? Just with a series of transformers?? And that ONE generator could be powered by water, therfore, FREE ELECTRICITY, except for the low cost of up-keep of lines & transformers.

Ahh...nice thought, but no. Transformers make a change to the voltage and current of the electricity, the power stays the same. Since high voltage/low current will travel long distances better than low voltage/high current, a transformer is needed to step the voltage down to a usable level at your house. The main thing to keep in mind in your scenario is that the power remains the same, no matter what changes you make to the voltage and current.

The actual reason your home generator needs to be properly disconnected from the grid is because if a lineman is working on a line that he believes has been de-energized, but you are back feeding your generator into that line, it presents a hazardous condition to those workers.
 
Top