Court declares Obama’s EPA “Waters of the United States Rule” unlawful

Court declares Obama’s EPA “Waters of the United States Rule” unlawful
Posted by Leslie Eastman Saturday, August 24, 2019 at 7:30pm

https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/...-the-united-states-rule-unlawful/#more-293182

“…vast expansion of jurisdiction over waters and land traditionally within the states’ regulatory authority cannot stand…”

Back in 2015, we covered the Obama administration’s far-reaching Waters of the United States (WOTUS) Rule and the pushback it received at the time. States’ suits are making their way through the courts, and there is good news to report!

U.S. District Judge Lisa Godbey Wood has handed a victory to the state of Georgia and nine other states that sued the federal government (and to the rest of the nation) by declaring that the WOTUS Rule is unlawful.

Wood stated that the rule, which was intended to provide better protection of the nation’s water, violated the Clean Water Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, and she remanded it back to the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers for further work.

She wrote that while the agencies have authority to interpret the phrase “waters of the United States,” that authority isn’t limitless, and therefore their decisions in doing so do not fall under what’s called Chevron deference, a matter of case law in which — for lack of a better phrase — the tie goes to the agency.

Click to expand...

Legal Insurrection readers may recall that implementation of the rule led to a Wyoming farmer being fined $37,500 a day for constructing a stock pond on his own property.

The American Farm Bureau Federation, which earlier this year won a decision in Texas that also found the rule legally wanting, praised Wood’s decision.

“The court ruling is clear affirmation of exactly what we have been saying for the past five years,” AFBF General Counsel Ellen Steen said. “The EPA badly misread Supreme Court precedent. It encroached on the traditional powers of the states and simply ignored basic principles of the Administrative Procedure Act when it issued this unlawful regulation.”

Wood found the WOTUS rule’s “vast expansion of jurisdiction over waters and land traditionally within the states’ regulatory authority cannot stand absent a clear statement from Congress in the CWA. Since no such statement has been made, the WOTUS Rule is unlawful under the CWA.”

She also determined the agencies’ “inclusion of all interstate waters in the definition of ‘waters of the United States,’ regardless of navigability, extends [their] jurisdiction beyond the scope of the CWA because it reads the term navigability out of the CWA.”

Click to expand...

Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes, representing one of the other states involved with this case, was also delighted with Wood’s ruling.

The 2015 WOTUS Rule is a clear example for federal overreach that infringed on the States’ traditional role as primary regulators of land and water resources within their borders. We are proud to have fought for this relief, and we look forward to reforms that will permanently relieve farmers and landowners of the unnecessary burdens that the 2015 WOTUS Rule created.

Click to expand...

Interestingly, U.S. Sen. Mike Braun (R-IN) and U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) recently introduced the “Define WOTUS Act,” which reasserts Congressional responsibility to define what the term, “Waters of the United States,” actually means.

The Obama-era WOTUS rule threatened Iowa’s farmers, manufacturers, and small businesses by giving the federal government authority to regulate water on 97 percent of land in our state,” said U.S. Senator Joni Ernst. “President Trump and his administration have taken tremendous steps to roll back this far-reaching regulation and provide for more certainty with a new, clearer definition of WOTUS. But it’s the job of Congress to make a new, reasonable definition permanent, and that’s what this bill does—it ensures more predictability and workability for Iowans for years to come.”

Click to expand...

Back in the 70's when the EPA was emboldened by the Nixon administration's policies on clean water, I had the unfortunate task of being promoted to Corporate compliance officer. No raise, just a title for a job nobody wanted.
When I asked the EPS officer what the term "waterway" meant, he stated quite completely,,,; "...basically,,,anything that is wet."

We went to court to get verification.

It had to be navigable waters and streams that fed them.

Obama took it that extra mile. And got away with it.

What I don't understand is how cities like San Francisco or LA could still allow feces in the storm system along with trash and drug needles without the Obama people coming down on them hard.

They should thank Trump and Lisa Godbey for the legal relief.

Oh wait,,,

FrancSevin said:

Back in the 70's when the EPA was emboldened by the Nixon administration's policies on clean water, I had the unfortunate task of being promoted to Corporate compliance officer. No raise, just a title for a job nobody wanted.
When I asked the EPS officer what the term "waterway" meant, he stated quite completely,,,; "...basically,,,anything that is wet."

We went to court to get verification.

It had to be navigable waters and streams that fed them.

Obama took it that extra mile. And got away with it.

What I don't understand is how cities like San Francisco or LA could still allow feces in the storm system along with trash and drug needles without the Obama people coming down on them hard.

They should thank Trump and Lisa Godbey for the legal relief.

Oh wait,,,

Click to expand...

Ca. has its own water war going on out here with the citizens of Ca. they are overturning 100 year old water rights. Maybe this will help that also. Martin