• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Media Trainwreck: Yeah, About That Picture Of The Alleged Russian Spy In The Oval

Jim_S

Gone But Not Forgotten
GOLD Site Supporter
Media Trainwreck: Yeah, About That Picture Of The Alleged Russian Spy In The Oval Office...It's Not Her
Matt Vespa| @mvespa1 |Posted: Jul 18, 2018 1:38 PM

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...ussian-spy-in-oval-officeits-not-her-n2501155

This week, Maria Butina was arrested for being an alleged spy for Russia. If you didn’t know her name, you sure will now given the Russiagate absurdity that’s engulfed the news media (via WaPo):

The Russian woman arrested on charges of being a foreign agent had ties to Russian intelligence operatives and was in contact with them while in the United States, federal prosecutors said Wednesday.
Maria Butina, 29, also had an ongoing relationship with a Republican operative, strictly for business purposes according to prosecutors, and offered another individual “sex in exchange for a position within a special interest organization.”
In a new court filing, prosecutors said Butina, who has connections with wealthy business executives linked to the Putin administration, appeared to have plans to flee the United States.
Butina was arrested on a criminal complaint Sunday, and federal authorities indicted her Tuesday for conspiracy to act as an agent of a foreign government and failing to register as an agent of a foreign government. She is scheduled for a detention hearing Wednesday afternoon on whether to release her from jail before trial, and prosecutors filed a motion this morning outlining why she should be held without bond.

So, of course, collusion fever reached unhealthy levels again yesterday. There was a picture of a woman with red hair—Butina is a redhead—in the Oval Office with President Trump. Great Odin’s raven! But it’s not her. It’s an NSC staffer with red hair. Regardless, the initial tweet went viral (via Mediaite):

Stephen Miller

@redsteeze
Butina even got as close as Susan Rice and Barack Obama, walking arm in arm. Just amazing
9:50 AM - Jul 17, 2018

590

296 people are talking about this

Stephen Miller

@redsteeze
Watching a photo go viral from journalists who haven’t confirmed the identity of the person in it
9:07 AM - Jul 17, 2018

1,184

289 people are talking about this

Lachlan Markay

@lachlan
A fmr WH official tells me he thinks the person in this NYT photo is Cari Lutkins, the WH's deputy director of events, who plans logistics for events like these
9:12 AM - Jul 17, 2018

132

107 people are talking about this

Tom Namako

@TomNamako
This photo is going around: That is not alleged Russian spy Maria Butina in the Oval Office With Trump. It’s an NSC staffer, a NSC source tells BuzzFeed News.
9:20 AM - Jul 17, 2018

1,516

1,314 people are talking about this

It would be a pretty big deal if it turned out there was a photo of that Russian agent in the White House, and an even bigger deal if it were the Oval Office with President Donald Trump, and a huge red siren big deal if she were in the Oval Office on the very week former FBI Director James Comey was fired.
And that’s exactly what Mic reporter Emily Singer reported on Twitter on Tuesday. Only she was flat wrong.
Only that isn’t so. That’s not her. The Daily Beast‘s Lachlan Markay first heard from the White House that it might be Cari Lutkins, a White House staffer, who was actually pictured.
[…]
The photo was still going around, though, and Buzzfeed’s Tom Namako confirmed that it was event planning Lutkins in the Oval Office and not Russian operative and federal detainee Butina.

And liberal media figures wonder why they’re mocked and not trusted anymore.
 

Attachments

  • 9ED48AF4-7710-4C7D-AEC7-34141CA7C2F4.jpeg
    9ED48AF4-7710-4C7D-AEC7-34141CA7C2F4.jpeg
    26.6 KB · Views: 26
  • 2C082902-1B25-4516-831A-8DADC084692F.jpg
    2C082902-1B25-4516-831A-8DADC084692F.jpg
    135 KB · Views: 28
  • 329A05FB-93EC-4CFF-9054-0AA9791D2674.jpeg
    329A05FB-93EC-4CFF-9054-0AA9791D2674.jpeg
    57.9 KB · Views: 29
  • 27EDC2C9-FEA0-4925-9296-E8898089D536.jpg
    27EDC2C9-FEA0-4925-9296-E8898089D536.jpg
    98.8 KB · Views: 28

rugerman

New member
Now why would the liberal media bother to check a story for correctness when it was a direct jab at the Trump Whitehouse, that would be counter productive, they figure throw the story out there score some brownie points if it proves to be wrong they can post a retraction at 2 or 3 AM when no one will see it and they can still claim that it was a competitor’s mistake that they copied in good faith.
 
Top