• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Ivanka Lobbies Congress to Reject the 2nd Amendment, Push Gun Control

Bamby

New member
Ivanka Lobbies Congress to Reject the 2nd Amendment, Push Gun Control

The following article, Ivanka Lobbies Congress to Reject the 2nd Amendment, Push Gun Control, was first published on Big League Politics.

Ivanka Trump has influenced her father to support gun control measures like red flag laws, and now she is working to convince Congress to do the same.

According to an Axios report, Ivanka has reached out to Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Pat Toomey (R-PA) recently to discuss gun control measures. She remains active in the nationwide push to restrict the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution.

“She called Manchin and said she was trying to get a sense of what bills are out there,” a Manchin aide said to Axios. “She had him explain how they drafted the bill, where it stands and what changes needed to be made in order for it to pass.”

A White House official has confirmed that Princess Ivanka “has trusted relationships on both sides of the aisle and she is working in concert with the White House policy and legislative teams.”

Following the mass shootings in El Paso, TX and Dayton, OH earlier this month, Princess Ivanka posted an image on Instagram expressing her sympathy for gun control.

“Congress should enact Red Flag laws / Extreme Risk Protection Orders in every state, increase resources dedicated to mental health support nationwide and close background check loopholes,” she wrote.

She also took to Twitter to proselytize on behalf of gun control, using the tragedies to push for liberal public policy goals:

Congress should enact Red Flag laws/ Extreme Risk Protection Orders in EVERY state and increase resources dedicated to mental health support. https://t.co/YWgccND8dH

— Ivanka Trump (@IvankaTrump) August 4, 2019

Unfortunately for supporters of the 2nd Amendment, the president is taking cues from Ivanka on this issue. President Trump is sounding like an elected Democrat official in his push for gun control.

“I think we can get something really good done,” the president said to reporters on Friday. “I think we can have some really meaningful background checks. We don’t want people that are mentally ill, people that are sick — we don’t want them having guns. Who does?”

“We must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms and that if they do, those firearms can be taken through rapid due process,” Trump said last week in his televised address in the wake of the shootings. “That is why I have called for red flag laws, also known as extreme risk protection orders.”

One silver lining in the enaction of red flag laws may be the fact that it could rob CNN anchor Christopher ‘Fredo’ Cuomo, who recently went on a violent rant toward a Trump supporter in a viral video clip, of his ability to own guns.

Would Chris Cuomo be given a Red Flag for his recent rant? Filthy language and a total loss of control. He shouldn’t be allowed to have any weapon. He’s nuts!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 13, 2019

Continue reading: Ivanka Lobbies Congress to Reject the 2nd Amendment, Push Gun Control …

Visit the USSA News store!
Click this link for the original source of this article.

I was for one surprised to see we had such a enemy within the Trump family.
 

rugerman

New member
You can ban guns but criminals will always get them, guns are inanimate objects, if left alone they will never hurt anyone, it’s the person that is using the gun that causes the death and destruction.sure some folks should not be able to have a gun, but the gun grabbers want to take them from everyone, which in the long run would turn a bunch of law abiding folks into criminals because they will not turn in their guns, or at least not all of them (like me). They say that by taking guns away it will save lives, hell let’s take away cars and trucks too, how many more folks are killed daily by vehicles than by guns (and yes they are innocent victims to). I know that I’m preaching to the choir, rant off.
 

jimbo

Bronze Member
GOLD Site Supporter
There is no bill that will restrict the second amendment. That would require an amendment.
 

Lenny

Well-known member
SUPER Site Supporter
This is really pissing me off. The government leaves our borders open to drugs. People take the drugs and then murder people with guns and they blame the guns rather than their incompetence and arrogance.

And nutty people will not commit mass murders if they know people will shoot back and the government KNOWS this.
 

FrancSevin

Proudly Deplorable
GOLD Site Supporter
This is really pissing me off. The government leaves our borders open to drugs. People take the drugs and then murder people with guns and they blame the guns rather than their incompetence and arrogance.

And nutty people will not commit mass murders if they know people will shoot back and the government KNOWS this.


Every despot in history knows this. From Hitler to Pol Pot to Venezuela's Maduro.
Take away the citizen's guns and they can't shoot back when the government decides to mass murder them.
 

Lenny

Well-known member
SUPER Site Supporter
To me this is not only a direct attack on our Second Amendment rights, it is also a facade, just like the Russian Collusion, to take attention away from other things that need done, like voter fraud laws and the list goes on.
 
Top