• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Reparations for Slavery?

Catavenger

New member
SUPER Site Supporter
I suppose the Democratic Party has now forgotten the words of Booker T. Washington or chooses to ignore them since he was an advisor to the REPUBLICAN Party. He said:
I have long since ceased to cherish any spirit of bitterness against the Southern white people on account of the enslavement of my race. No one section of our country was wholly responsible for its introduction... Having once got its tentacles fastened on to the economic and social life of the Republic, it was no easy matter for the country to relieve itself of the institution. Then, when we rid ourselves of prejudice, or racial feeling, and look facts in the face, we must acknowledge that, notwithstanding the cruelty and moral wrong of slavery, the ten million Negroes inhabiting this country, who themselves or whose ancestors went through the school of American slavery, are in a stronger and more hopeful condition, materially, intellectually, morally, and religiously, than is true of an equal number of black people in any other portion of the globe....This I say, not to justify slavery – on the other hand, I condemn it as an institution, as we all know that in America it was established for selfish and financial reasons, and not from a missionary motive – but to call attention to a fact, and to show how Providence so often uses men and institutions to accomplish a purpose. When persons ask me in these days how, in the midst of what sometimes seem hopelessly discouraging conditions, I can have such faith in the future of my race in this country, I remind them of the wilderness through which and out of which, a good Providence has already led us.

220px-Booker_T_Washington_retouched_flattened-crop.jpg


Here are some good links:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booker_T._Washington

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reparations_for_slavery

Ohby the way guess the political party of the President to invite the 1st African American to the Whitehouse?


Teddy Roosevelt who invited Booker T. Washington in 1901.
 

FrancSevin

Proudly Deplorable
GOLD Site Supporter
Reparations are not about "fairness."

They are about power.

They are about money.

They are about enslavement of future generations.

They are about "revenge."

Where have we heard that word recently?
 

Catavenger

New member
SUPER Site Supporter
They are about "revenge."
:agree:
Yep I think that "reparations" are stupid. However many stupid things have happened in the USA just look at who got elected President in 2008.
 
Last edited:

Kane

New member
"If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be OK. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.

And that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a
tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that."-
Barack Hussien Obama 2008
.
 
Top