• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Does America have a lawyer problem, or a law problem? Read more at the Washington Ex

XeVfTEUtaAqJHTqq

Master of Distraction
Staff member
SUPER Site Supporter
Sorry jpr but I couldn't agree more with this article . . .

http://washingtonexaminer.com/opini...es-america-have-lawyer-problem-or-law-problem

Does America have a lawyer problem, or a law problem?


By: Glenn Harlan Reynolds 02/04/11 8:05 PM
Sunday Reflections Contributor
As someone who teaches at a law school, and sees his students go out into the world, I am predisposed to like law. When I practiced law at a big firm here in Washington, D.C., I enjoyed it and I felt like we helped our clients with their problems, more often than not.
But a lot of people out there don't like lawyers, and think that the legal profession is harming the country. And I'm beginning to think that they might have a point.
The New York Times recently reported on the problems of an American entrepreneur in Greece. Though Greek political leaders desperately want new businesses to start up there - to help Greece's imploding economy and dreadful balance of trade - the barriers in terms of regulation and legal confusion are very high. The Times reports:
"Sitting in his office, Mr. Politopoulos took a long pull from a glass of his premium Vergina wheat beer and said it was absurd that he had to lobby Greek politicians to repeal a 19th-century law so that he could deliver the exports that Greece urgently needed.
"And, he said, his predicament was even worse than that: It was emblematic of the web of restrictions, monopolies and other distortions that have made many Greek companies uncompetitive, and pushed the country close to bankruptcy. . . .
"The Greek economy is riddled with distortions -- the number of trucking licenses has remained unchanged in Greece since 1971, for example, and the country is among the world's leaders in lawyers per capita. It has one lawyer for every 250 people, compared with about one for 272 in the United States. The effect on Greek competitiveness could not be more pernicious."
So America will have to churn out a few more lawyers to reach Greece's ratio. But not that many more. A few readers of my blog even gleefully emailed me this passage as an illustration that America should have fewer lawyers.
But while America might be better off if some of the smart people who go into law went into something more entrepreneurial, this may have things backwards. Is Greece's problem really too many lawyers? Or is it too many laws?
In his 1990s book, "Demosclerosis: The Silent Killer of American Government," Jonathan Rauch wrote about the tendency of special-interest laws to accumulate, adding complexity to, well, everything and making it much harder to do - or start - business. That certainly accounts for Mr. Politopoulos' problems - he wants to sell herbal tea, but an obscure Greek law requires brewers to brew only beer. No tea.
As a lawyer, I can think of half a dozen ways around this, but that's kind of the point. When laws are complex, there's almost always a way to lawyer around them, but to do that you have to pay a lawyer to figure it out, and then you have to structure your business in a way that's driven by the need to get around dumb and complex legal restrictions, rather than in a way that makes for an efficient business. But the demand for lawyers is a symptom of the problem, not the cause.
At least, that's what I've always thought. But now my University of Tennessee colleague Ben Barton is making me think again. He's got a new book out from Cambridge University Press, "The Lawyer-Judge Bias in the American Legal System," and his thesis is that lawyers are not only a symptom of overly complex laws, but also their cause.
In particular, he notes that in America, pretty much all judges (except for a few justices of the Peace and such) are lawyers. And, after examining the work of judges in a number of different areas, he concludes that judges systematically rule in ways that favor lawyers, and that make the legal system more complex. (And legislators, mostly lawyers themselves, aren't much better).
Barton tells me that his thesis gets two very different reactions depending on the audience: Non-lawyers find it painfully obvious, while most lawyers and legal academics find it shocking and offensive.
I'm neither shocked nor offended, but I do think that there's a real problem with America's current legal environment, and I think that we're in pretty much the same situation as Greece: If we want the kind of economic growth it's going to take to get us out of our current economic and indebtedness crisis, we're going to have to drastically reduce the number of laws and regulations confronting new and existing businesses.
That's hard to do piecemeal - hence the term "Demosclerosis." In his book, "The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities," economist Mancur Olson noted that frequently it takes a war or a revolution to clear away enough regulatory and special-interest underbrush to allow for fresh economic growth.
But Olson also noted that America has shown a unique capacity for self-renewal, often managing to start afresh without the kind of traumatic cleansing required by other nations.
Perhaps we can do that again. Looking around, I'd say it's about time. And if the end result is less work for lawyers, well, maybe some of those excellent minds can find something entrepreneurial to do instead. The country would probably be better for it.
Examiner contributor Glenn Harlan Reynolds is the proprietor of Instapundit.com and a law professor at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville.



 

muleman

Gone But Not Forgotten
GOLD Site Supporter
I have to agree we have too many lawyers in congress. They come there for the benefits for life and to pass more laws insuring their trade carries forth to try to untangle the mess they make. If more common folks were in congress we might not have 2,000 page legislation packages.
 

jpr62902

Jeanclaude Spam Banhammer
SUPER Site Supporter
I can't say I disagree entirely. But I will add some comments.

First, complex legislation is a double-edged sword. Some contend that it engenders a swelling population of lawyers. Maybe that's true, but the other side of the coin is that it's a legal malpractice trap. Generally speaking, lawyers don't like laws that are legal labrynths. The rules of evidence are downright arcane in some circumstances. I had a traffic case a few years ago where my client (the defendant) testified to where her car was when the accident occurred. I introduced pictures that my client took of the scene in support of her testimony. The judge ruled that the court wouldn't consider my client's testimony because she wasn't an accident reconstuction expert. WHAT? How about she's an eye witness, judge?

I can also add that part of the problem is people who think the rules don't apply to them. Have you ever tried to write a contract that covers every possible contingency? The language becomes ponderous. But why is that necessary? Because there's always some a-hole who's wanting to escape their responsibilities. The loophole a-hole.
 
Top