• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Surprising support for Trump yanking Brennan's security clearance

Jim_S

Gone But Not Forgotten
GOLD Site Supporter
August 17, 2018
Surprising support for Trump yanking Brennan's security clearance
By Thomas Lifson
A
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...rump_yanking_brennans_security_clearance.html

This may be a sign that the tide is turning and the cabal that conspired to fix the 2016 presidential election and then, when that failed, remove Trump from office is going to be exposed and ultimately held to account. As the Democrats and their media enablers bloviate about John Brennan's imaginary First Amendment right to a perpetual security clearance, a statement of support for the president came from an unexpected source yesterday. Lou Dobbs tweeted:

Lou Dobbs

@LouDobbs
Senate Intel Chairman, Richard Burr is defending President Trump. I believe this is a remarkable turn in the tides of Washington affairs and may well represent the beginning of the end of the Mueller Witch Hunt. @realDonaldTrump #AmericaFirst #Dobbs
4:28 PM - Aug 16, 2018

11.3K

6,839 people are talking about this


Lou Dobbs may be on to something in terms of the significance of this statement. Burr is highlighting a trap that Brennan is now caught in. As Clarice Feldman pointed out, Senator Burr is the chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) and a member of the Gang of Eight that gets access to the most secret documents. He is also a conspicuous member of the GOP establishment and until yesterday had been reticent in his approach to these Deep State scandals. Yet here he is, alluding to a trap that Brennan may be in.

President Trump signaled his appreciation of the importance of this move:

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
“Director Brennan’s recent statements purport to know as fact that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power. If Director Brennan’s statement is based on intelligence he received while leading the CIA, why didn’t he include it in the Intelligence Community Assessment......
9:54 PM - Aug 16, 2018

62.5K

27.5K people are talking about this


Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
.....released in 2017. If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach......” Richard Burr (R-NC) Senate Intel Cmte Chair @LouDobbs
10:04 PM - Aug 16, 2018

46.2K

22.6K people are talking about this


I have all along hoped that the story of the cabal would emerge in clear outline before the midterms, because President Trump is the master of the reality television story arc, and because he has the power to declassify any evidence he wants the public to know about.

Senator Burr, no matter how deep his Deep State ties, knows this, too, and also knows what's in most of those critical classified documents.
 

Attachments

  • 0037BFF6-94A9-4ADC-B988-5F378182B574.jpg
    0037BFF6-94A9-4ADC-B988-5F378182B574.jpg
    103.5 KB · Views: 13

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
Not surprising to me or anyone with any common sense.

Not sure why a FORMER EMPLOYEE should be allowed to maintain security clearance for anything? Any private sector employer would do this as a matter of course. In fact, depending upon the level of the former employee's responsibility, the employer may change the keys, alarm codes, etc. But under no circumstances would they leave the former employee "in the loop" for anything!

Not sure why a government employee is treated differently?
 

Jim_S

Gone But Not Forgotten
GOLD Site Supporter
Not surprising to me or anyone with any common sense.

Not sure why a FORMER EMPLOYEE should be allowed to maintain security clearance for anything? Any private sector employer would do this as a matter of course. In fact, depending upon the level of the former employee's responsibility, the employer may change the keys, alarm codes, etc. But under no circumstances would they leave the former employee "in the loop" for anything!

Not sure why a government employee is treated differently?

:thumb:
 
Top