• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Terror Attack in England

Doc

Bottoms Up
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
ISIS is now taking credit for the attack. Sick bastards. :angry:
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
I saw a report stating that there are roughly 3500 Islamic 'radicals' in England.
 

mla2ofus

Well-known member
GOLD Site Supporter
I think Trump will accept this as a gift from ISIS to further his efforts to turn all if not most peaceful muslims against ISIS.
Mike
 

waybomb

Well-known member
GOLD Site Supporter
And the Brit snowflakes protested Trump when he visited Manchester.
Have to wonder if any of those protesters were at the concert?
Goes around comes around? When will they wake the F up.
 

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
GOLD Site Supporter
...

When will they wake the F up.

Probably a year or two after we wake up. Let's be blunt, we are still a nation of sheep. We have 1/2 of our country that wants Trump in jail, a good portion of those support socialism, changing our Constitution to prevent logical people from speaking the truth, and they want free everything with you and me paying for it. They want us to all COEXIST with terrorists and expect the terrorists to lay down their weapons, bombs and dogma when they take over.
 

waybomb

Well-known member
GOLD Site Supporter
I have often thought about buying a rusted out 70-75 impala just to roam the highways to show how I "COEXIST" with those assholes with "COEXIST" stickers on their piece of shit econoboxes.

Come up on em and turn left right before I push their right rear bumper around - coexist this!

Coexist my ass. Gawd I hate them damn things.

OK, rant off.....
 

Danang Sailor

nullius in verba
GOLD Site Supporter
The presumed bomber had been "on the police radar" for some time but had committed no crime so they could take no action ... and therein lies the problem! We are treating these attacks, and their perpetrators, as a crime problem to be handled by law enforcement, when in reality they are soldiers in an organized non-governmental force - Islamic Supremacism - that has indeed declared war on civilization. (I almost wrote "western civilization" when it occurred to me that they are members of an uncivilized, barbaric cult. They are against civilization, period!)

Based on this, the military should be handling these barbarian pigs; law enforcement isn't meant to fight wars and that is what this is. We won't prevail until we begin to deal with this as what it is - armed conflict with a dedicated albeit monstrous enemy sworn to destroy us!

 

Danang Sailor

nullius in verba
GOLD Site Supporter
Religious wars never end well for one side. Which side is it going to be?
I have been uncomfortable with the tag "religious war" for some time and your post has brought that to a head, as it were.
From the view of the Islamic Supremacists this is absolutely a religious war, but looked at from the side of the civilized
world it is a war for survival with no religious overtones at all. Civilization has too many religions involved to call it
"religious" as that moniker has always been applied to a conflict where one religion or the other would end up as the
victor; that is not what is happening here.

Islamic Supremacists want to make Mohamed's nightmare a reality: the entire world under the heel of an Islamic theocracy.
The civilized world simply wants to preserve itself, free to pursue it's own course free from any theocratic restrictions.
The Supremacists feel they are doing Allah's work and have him on their side, while civilization believes they are following
their God-given right to self determination; in that regard I suppose this could be viewed as a "religious war" but it still
seems more a clash between 1400 years of civilization versus that same amount of barbarism.

No matter how it is viewed philosophically this is a war for the survival of our civilization, nothing less. Our role models
should be Charles Martel and Vlad Dracul; our battle one for extermination of Islamic Supremacism, as brutal as that is.

The alternative is condemning our children, and their children, to a life of misery living as dhimmis under Sharia, their very
lives forfeitable at any time at the whim of even the most insignificant of their Masters.

 

tiredretired

The Old Salt
SUPER Site Supporter
I have been uncomfortable with the tag "religious war" for some time and your post has brought that to a head, as it were.
From the view of the Islamic Supremacists this is absolutely a religious war, but looked at from the side of the civilized
world it is a war for survival with no religious overtones at all. Civilization has too many religions involved to call it
"religious" as that moniker has always been applied to a conflict where one religion or the other would end up as the
victor; that is not what is happening here.

Islamic Supremacists want to make Mohamed's nightmare a reality: the entire world under the heel of an Islamic theocracy.
The civilized world simply wants to preserve itself, free to pursue it's own course free from any theocratic restrictions.
The Supremacists feel they are doing Allah's work and have him on their side, while civilization believes they are following
their God-given right to self determination; in that regard I suppose this could be viewed as a "religious war" but it still
seems more a clash between 1400 years of civilization versus that same amount of barbarism.

No matter how it is viewed philosophically this is a war for the survival of our civilization, nothing less. Our role models
should be Charles Martel and Vlad Dracul; our battle one for extermination of Islamic Supremacism, as brutal as that is.

The alternative is condemning our children, and their children, to a life of misery living as dhimmis under Sharia, their very
lives forfeitable at any time at the whim of even the most insignificant of their Masters.



I respectfully digress. Whether we choose to use the term or not does not change a blessed thing. If we learned anything after 8 years of the past administration, we have learned that. A Rose by any other name smells the same.

Muslims have chosen this as a religious war and have really never stopped fighting it since the times of the Crusades. Their goal is total domination of everyone else and imposing their religious beliefs on them. That in itself makes it a religious war whether or not we are so inclined to do the same to them when we win, for we will win. Of that there is no doubt.

We are smarter then them, more resourceful then them but what we currently lack right now is the fortitude and commitment to prosecute this war the way it needs to be prosecuted.

The question is how many San Bernadinos and Manchester UK we are willing to tolerate until we reach that point. You and I may or may not ever see that day arrive, but arrive it will.
 
Top